Technology can help your aging parents

One of the most difficult family decisions can be whether to move an aging parent(s) out of their own home and into assisted living or even a nursing home. I’ve seen families face this dilemma numerous times. (After my psychiatry residency, I completed a geriatric psychiatry fellowship and also spent the first few years in practice consulting at nursing homes.)

Nobody wants to face this situation.

In fact, I’ve seen repeated instances of families in denial about the fact that their aging parents were declining mentally — often slowly but clearly drifting out into the sea of dementia. Usually the adult children were concerned about the well-being of their parents but understandably didn’t want to admit to themselves that there was a problem. Add to this the fact that patients developing dementia often lose their social skills later in the course of the illness, and many who have only brief social contacts with the person may very well be fooled into believing that they haven’t changed. Other patients may not be losing their memories, but they may have experienced a decline in their physical health that has caused themselves and others to question whether they can continue to live alone.

Enter technology.

It’s not a panacea, but we’re going to continue to discover new ways to use technological advances to solve old problems. For some families, it may be possible to utilize technology to help voluntarily provide supervision to those struggling to maintain their independence because of physical and/or mental challenges.

The New York Times recently published an article that gave examples of technology being used to monitor aging persons in this manner. One system cost a family $8,000 to install, but given the fact that that amount of money gave the family peace of mind, reduced guilt (a common emotion in adult children of aging parents, especially when they live far away from each other), and equaled only 2 months in an assisted living facility made the investment worth it. This particular system allowed the adult son of an aging woman to login over the internet and see her vital signs, which cabinets and doors had been opened, and whether she had taken her medication. The mother was somewhat reluctant at first to have this installed in her home, but now she really likes it.

I believe that the key to such a system being implemented in an ethical manner, as pointed out by a psychologist interviewed in the article, is that the person who will be monitored absolutely must agree voluntarily with its implementation.

Some will reject the general idea of monitoring technology, citing that it is intrusive, controlling, and maybe even “evil.”

Technology is not evil!

As with so many things in life, how it is used is what matters. If such monitoring is done covertly, even with good intentions, then it’s just plain wrong. On the other hand, as awkward as it may be for most adult children to discuss such an issue with their aging parent(s), if they all can agree on such monitoring and work collaboratively to provide supervision while maintaining dignity and independence, then I believe it will be a viable alternative to moving into an assisted living facility or nursing home for some people.

What do you think about this? Is it frightening, or is it an opportunity that, if used appropriately could help people?

Jeffrey Knuppel is a psychiatrist who blogs at The Positive Medical Blog.

Submit a guest post and be heard.

email

  • http://drpullen.com Ed Pullen

    This extremely high tech type system is helpful, but simple things like skype or mac to video conference can be a way to see as well as hear how someone is doing. Simple on-person call buttons to send for help in case of a fall, use of alarms to remind of medications, all can help too.

  • http://geriatricpt.wordpress.com David

    NPR also recently had a series of news stories about aging in place (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129086147&ps=rs). I think that skype, etc will work for those older adults who are higher functioning with some decline, but the more decline (cognitive, physical, and medical), the more monitoring is needed either in person or remotely, both of which are expensive if the parent(s) want to stay at home.

  • http://www.ideaworksforhealthcare.com Peter Springett

    Good points about technology, but Ed Pullen is on the right track. Personally I wonder whether 2-3 low spec laptops, broadband subscription and ‘always on’ Skype Video might not be a more affordable option.

  • Carolyn Smith

    While working with the aging, I came across this issue frequently: Elders want to stay in place but safety becomes an issue. Many have trouble with emergency buttons. Many get to the point where they cannot call on the phone for help.
    Technology can help but really just delays personal care giving a little more.

    As we “boomers” get older, it would behoove us to plan for our aging in such a way that we can reside in a place that has monitoring or levels of assistance as needed and spare our children the hassles of managing from a distance.

  • http://WordDriveCommunications.com Jane Sherwin

    I’d be worried about people who think that an $8,000 dollar system will actually substitute for good care on site. Even with such a system in place, I’d want to have hired a home care agency to know the situation and be checking regularly on my parent–and whom I could call if I learned, through my $8000 system, that my parent needed help. I think I like the “Skype always on” approach better.

    Jane

Trending