Medicare will soon cover preventive exams

A nice surprise buried somewhere in health care reform is that, starting next year, Medicare patients will be able to get annual preventative care exams that are paid for by their health insurance.

It may come as a surprise to those of you with commercial insurance who think of coverage of an annual exam as a routine thing for insurance to cover, but up to now Medicare has only covered a “Welcome to Medicare” exam in the first year after turning 65.

From then on, no physical exams at all are covered, and many preventative services, like colonoscopy and mammography, were either not covered, or subject to fairly high co-pays and deductible costs. As a physician this has always seemed like this is backwards.

I can make a pretty good argument that a physical exam for a 27 year old man is not needed annually, but it is essentially always a covered benefit in any plan the young insured patient has through an employer. Older adults are far more at risk for cancer, heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, depression, and safety at home issues than young adults. I am pleased that better preventative services coverage for our older and more vulnerable adults will be a paid service starting in 2011.

Starting September 23, 2010, 6 months after the signing of the bill, all new insurance plans, or current plans which make certain changes will be required to cover preventative services recommended by the United States Preventative Services Task Force as category A or B ratings (A = conclusive evidence and B = very strong evidence showing benefit of receiving the services) and beginning January 1, 2011, Medicare will also cover these services with no co-pay or deductible applicable.

This is good news for our seniors and should make it much easier for their physicians to convince our seniors, some of whom now have to choose between shelter, food or medicine on their poverty level fixed incomes, to receive preventative care.

Edward Pullen is a family physician who blogs at DrPullen.com.

Submit a guest post and be heard.

email

  • http://www.careermedicine.com CareerMedicine

    I agree with stargirl65 that physical needs to be limited to physicals but many a times it is not practical to do so for patient convenience and to manage expectations . But stargirl ..you need to negotiate your rates with these insurance companies when the contracts are up for renewal, if you have not done it yet.

  • http://www.MDiTV.com Aurora

    I think this is great news! I’ve been hearing about the importance of cost-savings that proper preventative care can bring for a while now. This seems like a wise move. Dr. Pullen, thank you for your input on this one. I would like to hear the opinions of some of the other medical professionals that read this blog: do you think that preventative care is important enough to be covered by medicare? How about all insurance plans (even for that 27-year old man)? Thanks!

    • http://drpullen.com Ed Pullen

      As a part of the reform all plans will be required to cover a preventative care visit by 2014.

  • stargirl65

    I agree that preventive health care is very important but the insurance companies do not seem to agree. I get paid $75 for a complete physical on adults. This is less than a level 4 visit. Patients often also want all their ongoing medical issues managed at the same visit as well as throwing in a few new problems. There is no way that can be done for so little money. It takes a lot of time. The patients are advised the other problems will incur other charges as they are not included in the physical, and most complain about this A LOT. Their other option is to return for the other services. They do not like that option either. Their physical is only a $20 copay and no deductible to be met. The rest of the visit goes toward the deductible (but they have to pay for it usually). That is one reason they want it all covered under the physical charge. A real physical to be done properly and to address truly all problems and the counselling with it needs to be reimbursed for more than $75.

  • http://www.careermedicine.com CareerMedicine

    Finally patients will be able to atleast have a decent medical care and be in control of their own health. During a physicial exam a doctor can suggest patients many ways to stay healthy thus reducing medical costs.

  • SmartDoc

    Is this an attempt by our new federal overlords to eliminate “concierge” (an adjective I hate) medicine?

    Some private practitioners using a $1000 or so yearly preventive exam as a tool to stay in primary care practice, while accepting the inadequate Medicare fees for the rest of the year.

  • elizabeth

    The problem is many preventative care visits result in ordering blood tests, imaging, follow-up visits. This will have to come out of the patients’ pockets (most of these new insurance plans will have huge deductibles). The result will be noncompliance or having the tests and not paying the bills. A lot of the newly added insureds will be people who are having a difficult time making ends meet. Medical bills are typically at the bottom of the priority list since electricity and cable can be shut off and eviction notices served. Since our society cannot accept any sort of rationing of care or any outcome that is less than perfect, how can this new law possibly save money?

  • http://nostrums.blogspot.com Doc D

    Is this the exam where the legislation requires you to discuss end-of-life planning (and repeat q 5yr.)? Or was that taken out? I remember looking it up in the early version of the bill, but don’t remember whether it was merged with the prevention exam.

    Not saying it’s bad, just wondering.

  • Bladedeoc

    AFAIK the reason they didn’t cover preventative physicals is because they fail the $158K/QUALY rule that medicare uses to justify interventions. In other words it takes more than 158 preventative physical exams to save one life year.

    In other news almost every study done on preventative medicine including the most recent one out of Harvard shows that increasing the amount of preventative care has two effects. First it does save lives — good! Second costs go UP not down because the lives saved go on to use more health care in the future. For a simplistic example smoking cessation increases costs overall because someone dying at 50 from lung cancer is a lot cheaper that someone dying at 80 in a nursing home with end stage Alzheimer’s. Pretending that preventative care will save money in the long run when the facts are the opposite (and well known to anyone that reads the literature) is called lying.

    • http://drpullen.com Ed Pullen

      In this post I nowhere addressed cost to Medicare. I cannot argue that doing preventative care saves money, and was not trying to address systemic cost issues. Some of the comments suggest it will save money, but I doubt that will be an outcome of more preventative visits.

  • BladeDoc

    Ed — I was responding to some of the comments above mine. I did not mean to imply that you stated otherwise in terms of cost issues.

    Bill

Trending