How health reform can be popular with the American public

The health reform legislation was decidedly unpopular, with a variety of polls showing the majority disapproved of the bill.

What did the people want?

The ACP’s Bob Doherty linked to a post by Princeton’s Uwe Reinhardt, who observed 10 things that the public wants in health care reform:

1. Lets only patients and their own physicians determine how to respond clinically to a given medical condition, never an insurance clerk or, even worse, government bureaucrats.
2. Limits their families’ out-of-pocket payments for health care to make it “affordable.”
3. Keeps insurance premiums and taxes for health care low.
4. Does not ever ration health care, because that is un-American and practiced only by un-American alien nations with inferior health systems.
5. Does not allow public or private insurers to let “costs” or “cost-effectiveness” ever enter coverage decisions, because that would implicitly put a price on human life which, in America, unlike elsewhere in the world, is priceless.
6. Does not mandate individuals to purchase health insurance, if they do not wish to do so, if for no other reason than that this would be unconstitutional and, therefore, un-American.
7. On the other hand, grants every American the moral right – backed up by a government mandate called EMTALA – to receive critically needed and possibly high cost health care from hospitals and their affiliated doctors, even if they are uninsured and could not possibly pay for that expensive care with their own resources.
8. Controls Medicare spending, which is widely thought to be completely out of control, as long as it does not reduce payments to hospitals or to doctors or to producers of medical technology, or to any other provider of health care.
9. Provides universal health insurance coverage to all Americans, provided it does not mean raising taxes or cutting Medicare spending or raising premiums on healthy Americans.
10. Keeps government out of health care but somehow makes sure that insurance companies do not exploit patients through incomprehensible fine print, no one engages in price gouging – e.g., charge $10 for an aspirin – and no one in health care earns excessive profits (or any at all).

Got that?

When it comes to health care, “let them have their cake and eat it too,” is the clear motif of the American public’s mentality. It’s unlikely that any idea coming out of Washington would have been popular.

But there will come a time when cuts will have to be made in services, and patients are going to rebel to those proposals. It’s not a matter of if, but when. President Obama shied away from these difficult decisions, punting it to future generations.

I pity the politicians who will eventually be forced to deal with it.

email

  • http://www.drjshousecalls.blogspot.com Dr. Mary Johnson

    The people who are the “providers” – particularly those of us who have labored as physicians in primary care and public service and “under-served” areas – only to be taken for granted and horribly used/abused – treated like pawns on a chessboard of power . . . want our voices and our stories to be heard and be considered – by Washington, the Courts, and the still-fawnng-over-Obama MSM.

    I’ve been at this for twelve years – five of them in the blogosphere – and I can tell you that it has not happened.

    What we got in this bill was NOT change – just more of the same – and it offers little real hope to the profession.

    If something does not happen soon, this country will have (and for the most part, deserve) exactly what its apathy and neglect will bring it.

  • rezmed09

    April Fools!!! (Americans)

  • Yious

    Have we not realized that there are many who don’t like it simply because someone of the other party is the one offering it?

    • Ron Hood

      Yious, you are undoubtedly right about some. But it’s interesting that the percentages coming out against the bill are strikingly similiar to those percentages voting for Obama in ’08. You might be shocked at the number of converts because of the bill.

  • http://www.drjshousecalls.blogspot.com Dr. Mary Johnson

    Oh puhlease, Yious. I wish the holier-than-thous who are trying to simplify legitimate criticisms and objections to this wholesale snow-job of the American public would give those of us serving up the hard truths (based on experience) more credit.

    We “tea-partiers” are “fringe-talkers” and are supposed to “tone it down” (that’s from “our” President on DRUDGE just today). But here’s the thing about that: I’ve been trying to get someone in Washington (and/or Raleigh) to really LOOK at what happened to me in public/government service (the NHSC) for over twelve years. It was WRONG – utterly, totally WRONG on so many levels. And I’ve played by the rules and done all the channels. Keeping it “toned down” doesn’t work.

    I REFUSE to stand by silently now while the Congress of the Unitied States throws even MORE money at a program that totally abandoned me to the wolves (having done NOTHING to either address or fix what went wrong) during the CLINTON administration . . . and tries to sell it to the American public as a way to fix primary care – particularly primary care in “underserved” areas. Oversight was/is nonexistant or I would not be here.

    It’s a revolving door – and a BandAid at best.

    I don’t like “it” because I’ve already lived “it” and “it” doesn’t work. If you keep shoving good, hard-working people into corners, you should not be surprised when they say, “ENOUGH!!!” and come out swinging.

    P.S. I’m a registered Independent.

  • W

    “…a variety of polls…”

    This statement is supposed to be proof of something? Many polls showed it was popular — all depending on who took the poll, who was polled, how the poll was presented and what purpose it was to be used for.

    If you don’t approve of reform, fine. Back your case with specifics. I don’t know what to think about it, and that’s because so much crap like this has been thrown about from both sides that I seriously doubt ANYONE speaking about it really has any clue what he or she is talking about.

  • http://www.drjshousecalls.blogspot.com Dr. Mary Johnson

    Hello W?

    The comment immediately preceding yours was quite specific.

    In “Rahming” this thing through, Chicago-style, Obama & company only heard what they wanted to hear – only invited praise – only want to hear about/promote/broadcast “success stories” – when it came to the “change-that-really-isn’t” that they advocate.

    Providing edivdence of abject failure . . . from people who have a fairly good clue . . . well, that was not on the docket.

    Still isn’t.

    Obama is in Charlotte N.C. today. He wants to talk about economics, so we will not be hearing about how Medicaid was bilked out of many millions – if not billions – of dollars several years back . . . when then state government pretty much handed over the “disproportionate share” program (a program where hospitals are re-imbursed for the care of the indigent) over to a few select/really BIG hospitals (like CMC in Charlotte) to oversee and run. Oversight was non-existent. When the doo hit the fan and all of the investigating was done – no one went to jail – and the Feds were paid back pennies on the dollar – because all of the winking and nodding that had gone on did not rise to the level of the “criminal?!? It made the papers for all of a day.

    The system is dirty and corrupt, but by ALL means, lets add the care of 30 million people to the mix.

    And those of us who oppose this mess do not have a clue.

    Yeah, right.

  • sam rey

    The public wants transparency and understanding as to the real reasons why health care cost is bankrupting our economy and we have not address the real causes. i believe myself that it is the addiction to greed….more money is the treatment for the addiction by hook or by crook. hence….STATUS QUO.

  • pat

    I believe that the only way to cut costs and improve health care is to restore the relationship between doctors and patients. That means the patient, and no one else, pays the doctor. I am not slighting doctors here, but they are currently in an untenable position and will continue to be so as long as there are third party payors. Individuals should purchase their own major medical insurance (and receive the tax benefits) and probably pay out of pocket for routine care (HSAs would be good, too). I think that this is the healthcare reform we need and it doesn’t have to involve the feds at all. States could tailor Medicare for those who cannot afford insurance at all. Getting too much into detail here, but I think the doctor/patient relationship is the key to everything.

  • DanaW

    No legislation is going to change patient midsets – that is the real problem we’re facing.

    Americans believe health care is a right, and it is something that will never be denied if you walk into a hospital.

    As a cancer survivor, I’m very opinionated on this issue. We were fortunate to have had (and still have) excellent coverage during my treatment.
    We would have made any sacrifices needed on our end to make sure I received the best care and treatment. Luckily, my Hodgkins appears to have been very well treated and has shown no sign of recurrence the past 18 months.

    How many people are willing to give up their season tickets to the NFL or their annual vacation to pay for health insurance? Few.

    My mom has type 2 diabetes (I sold insulin/injectible diabetes medications for 8 years). Apathy is the BIGGEST issue with type 2 diabetes. Patients generally don’t want to be accountable for their own health.

    Change that mindset, and we’ll turn this train wreck around. Until then, no legislation is going to fix a much more pervasive problem.

  • Joe Egan

    I have been in the service station business for 32 years. During that time I have engaged many, many of my customers in conversation regarding health insurance.

    Her is the scenario: Young couple driving say, a new 4 wheel drive truck with jet ski or snowmobile etc, stop in for gasoline. I ask, “How do you guys afford these adult toys?” They say, “we both work.”

    At this point I have them setup for the next question. “Do you guys have health insurance?”. Their answer, “No, we can’t afford it.”

    Is it any wonder why I am upset with the idea of paying taxes to provide health care to the likes of these? It certainly is not for those on welfare, they already get medical certificates with welfare.

    Refugees collect over $1800.00 per month from SSI for seven years while they obtain citizenship. At age 76, Social Security pays me only $1100.00 per month and I pay 15% of my self employment income back to social security.

    Yes, I am at odds with congress and your president.

  • Joe Egan

    Where is the coverage to those who need it most. ie: people in nursing homes, long term care, catastrofic desease and accident etc.

    Where are the restrictions on the amount, money grubbing, lawyers can collect on law suits against doctors and hospitals?

    Awards to plaintifs should certainly cover any and all actual damages and any losses of income due to long term disability due to injury. Such awards should include actuarial increases to income that would be expected over his expected lifetime. The awards should be placed in trust and payed out monthly just like an income check.

    nuff said.

Trending