Emergency departments are frequently used by young adults

by Kristina Fiore

Twenty-somethings rely on emergency departments (EDs) for care far more than do other age groups, researchers have found.

In 2006, nearly a quarter of all young adult healthcare visits — 22.1% — took place at an ED, compared with 12.6% for children and adolescents and 8.3% for patients over 30.

That rate has significantly increased over a 10-year period, Robert J. Fortuna, MD, MPH, of the University of Rochester Medical Center, and colleagues reported online in the Journal of General Internal Medicine.

“A considerable amount of care provided to young adults in the U.S. is delivered through emergency departments,” the researchers wrote. “Trends further suggest that young adults are increasingly relying on emergency departments for healthcare while being seen for less urgent indications.”

What’s more, this is occurring at a time when EDs are increasingly overburdened, they added.

It has been reported that 20-somethings overuse emergency care, frequently because they are the age group most likely to lack health insurance, and to lose their insurance during this transition from adolescence and adulthood.

They are also the leading age group for many types of risky behaviors, including substance abuse, sexually transmitted infections, homicide, and car accidents.

So, to characterize emergency to young adults, the researchers conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from 17,048 ED visits and 14,443 outpatient visits by patients in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

The researchers found that between 1996 and 2006, ED visits by patients ages 20 to 29 increased by 5.5 million, rising to 22.1% of all healthcare visits among this age group (up from 19.1%) in 1996 (P<0.001).

The 2006 figures compare with 12.6% of visits by children and adolescents, and 8.3% for patients ages 30 and over.

“This finding likely represents a combination of relative overutilization of emergency services and underutilization of primary care,” the researchers wrote.

Twenty-somethings were more likely to be cared for in EDs for both injury-related and noninjury related problems than any other age group (P<0.001).

Just 19.4% of young adult visits were injury-related, and the majority of cases weren’t of an urgent nature, the researchers said. Less than 5% of 20-somethings were admitted to the hospital following treatment.

Their visits were half as likely as other age groups to be triaged as immediate or emergent (P<0.001).

This suggests that a good portion of their care could have been done in an outpatient clinic instead, the researchers wrote.

They also found that black patients received a disproportionate amount of healthcare in EDs — considerably more than white 20-somethings (36.2% versus 19.2%, P<0.001). In 2006, nearly half (48.5%) of all healthcare provided to young black men was delivered through emergency departments.

The researchers said the increase may result from barriers in access to primary care, disparities in preventive services, or inequalities in health education.

Fortuna said that new provisions in the healthcare reform act “are encouraging for young adults.”

“Currently, young adults are the most likely age group to be uninsured and have the highest rates of many preventable conditions,” he said in an e-mail to MedPage Today. “The possibility to extend coverage for many young adults until the age of 26 is an important step towards improving health for young adults.”

Future initiatives to reduce overburdening EDs, Fortuna said, should focus on improving primary care for young adults.

“Access to a usual source of primary care is associated with improved overall health outcomes and lower rates of preventable ED use,” he said in a statement.

“Improving health access for young adults will require a multifaceted approach to expand healthcare coverage, improve transition between adolescent and adult care, and increase overall awareness of the importance for young adults to establish a usual source of care.”

The authors noted that their study was limited because the databases used may underestimate ambulatory care and overestimate ED visits.

Kristina Fiore is a MedPage Today staff writer.

Originally published in MedPage Today. Visit MedPageToday.com for more emergency medicine news.

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

  • Catherina Pekdeger

    In Germany we have the same tendency.People here are a 100% covered by health insurance. Most of the time the physicians hear replies like”my family physician’s office was closed” or I just don’t feel so good. The number of young adults with a migration background from Russia or Turkey or the middle east who frequent the ER with problems that could have been solved by a family physician is especially high. Having 100% insurance coverage just seemed to have lowered the inhibitions to frequent the ER at odd hours without due cause.

  • Yious

    As a 20-something, I go to the ER for a few things the last few years

    I had some chest pain once at went there
    I have had a VERY bad fever and went

    I have solid health insurance though and usually go to my doctor afterwards

  • mark

    The family physician office is closed in a socialized medicine society because the family doctor thinks why should he work more if the pay will be the same and I agree. I’d close at 3pm and never work evenings, saturdays or sundays if my pay was not proportionate to my income. Why work harder and kill myself? “Go to the E.R”. would be my after-hours message. I’ll call you back in a week or two when I get back from ‘holiday’ which I’d take 12 times/year.

  • DJ

    In modern society, and especially younger people, we are all addicted to the quick fix , and nothing happens fast enough, thus people do not even want to wait for appointments….even for complex problem that require time for evaluation and treatment. The tendency is to try to reduce all problems, even complex problems, to simple solutions that we would all like to believe can be handled rapidly through an urgent care/ ED…. thus the keen interest by business/marketing types to exploit this modern “hurry sickness” by filling the niche for these services by erecting ‘quick care’ type facilities all over the country as fast as possible.

    The disconnect of course is that biological systems, that are injured or inflamed, respond slowly to treatment and it takes time; something which both our hectic, frenzied lives and our puritan work- ethic culture does not allow for.

    I noticed that blacks use these quick health services even more. That is cultural, in my experience, and is not unique to health care services. I used to work in an inner city health clinic and they would never wait to see the specialist in a few weeks. It was completely beyond their experience and expectations. Everything had to be handled NOW and if it could not, then it would not be addressed, and the illness would grow so advanced that it would come to a head and require aggressive treatment in the Ed or hospital admission to address it, usually at great expense.

  • family practitioner

    One possible explanation:
    Younger people have grown up in the era of complete devaluation of primary care so they do not feel they have a need for it.