Communication with the patient may not be helped by time

If the lack of time is the chief barrier to poor physician-patient communications, it logically follows that longer patient appointments are the solution. Ok, let’s say that I could wave a magic wand and add 5 or even 10 more minutes to the average primary care office visit. Would more time really make a difference?

Probably not.

A quick examination of just some of the key drivers of physician-patient communications reveals why:

More time will not change how physicians view the physician-patient relationship
A physician’s communication style is a “window” into how they view the physician-patient relationship, e.g., physician-centered versus patient-centered. One landmark study of physician communication styles found that almost two-thirds of physicians (IM and FP) in the study had a physician-centered view of how physicians and patients should relate to one-another.

Communication with the patient may not be helped by time

More time will not change a physician’s communication style
While even the most physician-centered physician can incorporate elements of patient-centered communication in the medical interview process, the reality is that providers revert back to type. A provider with physician-centered directed orientation will still most likely interrupt the patient, not ask if the patient has questions and not use “teach-back” to make sure the patient understood what the physician said and so on.

More time will not likely change a physician’s reliance on observable patient characteristics when deciding how to treat patients
In addition to observable patient characteristics like age, gender, race and education, there is the person “behind the disease” who comes to the doctor with their own set of health beliefs, life experiences and treatment preferences. When the physician recommends a treatment that the patient does not believe will work, the likelihood of patient non-adherence is much greater than if the physician took the time to ask the patient their thoughts and collaborate with the patient on exploring the treatment that will work for both parties.

Time is not the problem when it comes to improving physician-patient communications. I don’t really believe that additional reimbursement to physicians for sub-optimal patient communications is the answer either.

Numerous studies have shown that patient-centered communication techniques in primary care practices can improve patient outcomes, change behavior and increase patient and provider satisfaction without increasing the length of the office visit.

Steve Wilkins is a former hospital executive and consumer health behavior researcher who blogs at Mind The Gap.

Submit a guest post and be heard.

email

  • http://www.medicallessons.net Elaine Schattner, M.D.

    Sorry, but I think you’re dead-wrong on this one.

    Time is a huge, positive factor in a patient-doctor relationship: first, it helps establish trust between the patient and physician; it affords detailed review of the history; it allows for thorough physical examination; it provides for careful review of the patient’s laboratory findings; it facilitates meaningful dialogue among consultants; it gives the patient time to ask questions and for doctor to respond appropriately. And more.

    • http://www.askthedentist.com Cat

      I agree. Trust is huge for proper diagnosis and time allows for doctor and patient to get to know one another.

  • http://www.healthecommunications.wordpress.com Steve Wilkins

    I agree with you. Time is a huge factor in the physician-patient relationship depending upon how it is used by both parties. Interestingly, research shows that physicians who employ a patient-centered communication style can perform the essence of what you identified without more time added to the visit. Patients of such physicians already trust them and will cut their physician “slack” if there’s not enough time for everything. That same research has linked improved patient outcomes, enhanced compliance and better satisfaction to patient-centric communications.

    More time during the visit would probably not benefit most patients (in terms of outcomes, compliance or satisfaction) of physicians that employ the more traditional and dominant bio-medical or physician-directed communications approach. Why? Principally because they do not solicit the patient’s agenda, don’t not ask if the patient has any questions, does not acknowledge patient complains, etc. pursuing instead their own line of diagnostic reasoning. Patients aren’t oblivious…they can recognize who is in charge under such scenarios…and in may cases that’s they way patients want it.

    As for patient questions, the empowered, expert patients are apparently the one’s doing most of the question-asking. Check out the research on this very subject at http://www.healthecommunications.wordpress.com.

    Steve Wilkins

  • student

    Mr. Wilkins, though I am sympathetic to your emphasis on the art of the interview as are most in medicine, I humbly disagree with your conclusions on how it is fostered.

    You assume physician interviewing style is a strongly fixed personality trait unresponsive to time. Yet, in contradiction, you also imply that simply telling physicians to be more patient-centered based on studies will convince them to change instead. This ignores how stress (caused by lack of time) affects conversation approach in any context. These categories clearly are not as rigid as the table boxes in your article. Does not reason suggest many ‘physician-centered’ practitioners would opt to be ‘patient-centered’ if allotted more time? And if not, why are we so judgmental about physician’s attitudes?

    Further, I disagree with your use of the cited studies: they do not imply that patient-centered interviewing can be effective or even perceived as patient-centered if time is insufficient. Extreme examples elucidate this point ie: patient-centered trauma interviewing vs. get the info more directly if you have very little time. You may not agree, but most clinicians would say such a time threshold has been met and crossed. There is no patient-centered interaction if time is not prioritized on the patient-physician interaction. Do you really think patients are so willing to share their lives and anxieties without receiving a payment of earnest time, that they are so fooled by a sleight of sentence structure alone?

    If you don’t believe these arguments, believe the observational data: the changes in interviewing style during medical training. As a graduating medical student, I can assure you my education invested fully in the patient-centered approach as had that of my predecessors. Yet, by the time one becomes an attending, it is claimed these same persons have changed or not committed to being patient centered by your logic. In contrast, the most poignant variables to my mind are shortened time and increased responsibility. Even within my limited transition from 3rd year to 4th year ‘responsibilities,’ I saw this within my own novice approach.

    I like to think I am not all bad for this change, and I like to think my mentors and role models are simply pressed for time when they are sometimes perceived as not patient-centered by outside observers. When the obvious change in clinical medicine has been the shortened time and devaluation of cognitive skills/communication, it boggles my mind that people look for invented efficiencies or technology to substitute. Is it so hard to imagine that people with more time are more considerate and that patients respond to considerate providers?

  • http://www.communicationstyles.us Robert Keteyian

    Interpersonal communication is both art and science. There are many ways to look at communication styles and much to learn. So, increasing time spent with patients, though a good idea, is not sufficient to effect the quality of the communication and relationship.

    • http://anynaseo.com bianca

      I am totally agree with this. And I think that you must also emphasize in one way or another with the patients…

  • http://www.drmintz.com Matthew Mintz, mD

    There is no question that a strictly physician-centered doctor will still have serious deficits in patient communication, even if given all the time in the world. However, the shorter the time period the more likely a phyisician shifts from patient centered to physician centered. Though a patient centered approach not only improves communication but is also usually more efficient then a physician centered approach, there is a “sweet spot” in which if a visit get too short, a patient centered approach is simply not possible. This time period is affected by the complexity of the visit. For example, a 65 year old patient with hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes; even if their chronic diseases are well controlled and they have no other complaints (pretty rare), will need a brief physical exam, lab work, referrals and refills of medications. If this patient is scheduled in a 15 minute visit, it is highly unlikely that even the most patient centered physician will be able to use a patient centered approach. Asking questions like “what concerns do you have” or “is there anything else that brings you here today” are simply not permitted with the time allotted.

  • jsmith

    Adequate time is not sufficient but it is necessary.

  • Tom

    On the topic of communications, there is an amazing documentary we saw on DVD this week and there is a doctor/patient interview/relationship which is truly outstanding. The film is about Alzheimer’s disease, and how the creative arts helps those with AD and their caregivers open up doors of communications. If you see the film, the interview I refer to is with the doctor and the early onset patient. First heard about the film on Alz. Weekly and highly recommend it: http://www.alzheimersweekly.com/Art_and_Music/i-remember-better-when-i-paint-a654.html

  • http://www.whitecoatwisdom.com Steve Busalacchi

    I’ve worked on communications issues with phyisicans for many years as a reporter and communications consultant and they commonly report being rushed because of arbitrary time limits. “When I take a little more time, I can teach better,” one physician told me. It’s both smart communicating and adequate time.

  • http://www.abimfoundation.org Amy Cunningham

    This provocative post underscores the need for physician empathy — the ability of a physician to understand and appreciate the patient’s experience. An ABIM Foundation-funded program at the Cleveland Clinic, uses narrative writing to increase physician empathy. Read more about the project here: http://www.abimfoundation.org/Professionalism/Professionalism%20in%20Practice.aspx