<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Why Medicare and health care should be deregulated</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/02/medicare-health-care-deregulated.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/02/medicare-health-care-deregulated.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: David Allen</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/02/medicare-health-care-deregulated.html#comment-126248</link> <dc:creator>David Allen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42519#comment-126248</guid> <description>I think if you read some of the other comments, you will find that I have answered this, to some degree, already.  It is certainly true that correlation does not prove causality.  But what does prove causality?  You need (among other things) some mechanistic explanation, or at least a plausible cause and effect relationship between the two variables.  In our case, it is certainly plausible that a new government program that begins paying for lots of things (Medicare) has resulted in more money being spent in the industry and higher costs per product in that industry.  Here is a fuller analysis of the situation:  http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/09/understanding_the_cause_of_hea.htmlAnd a paper about this issue:  http://econ-www.mit.edu/files/788 .  Interestingly, this paper concludes that third-party payer systems in general had a large effect on medical inflation:As to my &#039;claims&#039; regarding capitalism, you are on to a much greater issue about which numerous tomes have been written.  It would be impossible to convince you of the veracity of my position in such a short amount of time and space.  If you are not already of that position, it would (and should) take exposure to lots of different facts and writings to convince you.  We can&#039;t do that here, and I am probably not up to the task in any case.If you truly are interested in different perspectives on this, then I refer you to The Von Mises Institute (http://mises.org/), to the very accessible book &quot;Free To Choose&quot; by Milton Friedman, or George Reisman&#039;s Blog and works (http://www.georgereisman.com/blog/).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if you read some of the other comments, you will find that I have answered this, to some degree, already.  It is certainly true that correlation does not prove causality.  But what does prove causality?  You need (among other things) some mechanistic explanation, or at least a plausible cause and effect relationship between the two variables.  In our case, it is certainly plausible that a new government program that begins paying for lots of things (Medicare) has resulted in more money being spent in the industry and higher costs per product in that industry.  Here is a fuller analysis of the situation: <a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/09/understanding_the_cause_of_hea.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/09/understanding_the_cause_of_hea.html</a></p><p>And a paper about this issue: <a href="http://econ-www.mit.edu/files/788" rel="nofollow">http://econ-www.mit.edu/files/788</a> .  Interestingly, this paper concludes that third-party payer systems in general had a large effect on medical inflation:</p><p>As to my &#8216;claims&#8217; regarding capitalism, you are on to a much greater issue about which numerous tomes have been written.  It would be impossible to convince you of the veracity of my position in such a short amount of time and space.  If you are not already of that position, it would (and should) take exposure to lots of different facts and writings to convince you.  We can&#8217;t do that here, and I am probably not up to the task in any case.</p><p>If you truly are interested in different perspectives on this, then I refer you to The Von Mises Institute (<a href="http://mises.org/" rel="nofollow">http://mises.org/</a>), to the very accessible book &#8220;Free To Choose&#8221; by Milton Friedman, or George Reisman&#8217;s Blog and works (<a href="http://www.georgereisman.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.georgereisman.com/blog/</a>).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Oliver</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/02/medicare-health-care-deregulated.html#comment-126229</link> <dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:44:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42519#comment-126229</guid> <description>&quot;Check out what you can a surgery for in some foreign hospitals that cater to US citizens (medical tourists). Costs are low, quality can be high. The hook is: they only take cash. Because cash works.&quot;Totally aside from the fact that those costs take into account the standard quality of life in the country, and the salary ranges common there, as well as occupational safety and health standards etc.etc. and as such, aren&#039;t transferable to the US or any other country, this is a classic example of selection bias. Comparing a subpopulation willing and able to pay extra for its health with the general public is bogus and ignores issues of compliance, personal standards of living of the patient etc. etc. ad nauseam.&quot;But even for this, I believe costs would drop if patients bear more of the shared expense and pay the doctor directly, then submit the claim to the insurer themselves as the customer.&quot;And if the insurer then tell them &quot;no thanks&quot;, they&#039;ll be just as financially ruined as they are now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Check out what you can a surgery for in some foreign hospitals that cater to US citizens (medical tourists). Costs are low, quality can be high. The hook is: they only take cash. Because cash works.&#8221;</p><p>Totally aside from the fact that those costs take into account the standard quality of life in the country, and the salary ranges common there, as well as occupational safety and health standards etc.etc. and as such, aren&#8217;t transferable to the US or any other country, this is a classic example of selection bias. Comparing a subpopulation willing and able to pay extra for its health with the general public is bogus and ignores issues of compliance, personal standards of living of the patient etc. etc. ad nauseam.</p><p>&#8220;But even for this, I believe costs would drop if patients bear more of the shared expense and pay the doctor directly, then submit the claim to the insurer themselves as the customer.&#8221;</p><p>And if the insurer then tell them &#8220;no thanks&#8221;, they&#8217;ll be just as financially ruined as they are now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Oliver</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/02/medicare-health-care-deregulated.html#comment-126228</link> <dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:34:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42519#comment-126228</guid> <description>You are committing the basic fallacy of confusing correlation with evidence of a causative relationship. Just because two things happened in parallel doesn&#039;t mean that one caused the other. This fallacy you fall for is at the heart of both your claims in the article and your claims concerning capitalism, meaning that unfortunately, your &quot;arguments&quot; are devoid of real evidence. It also troubles me that you consistently refer only to US agencies, and only to hand-picked ones. This suggests that you have to cherry-pick the data to make your point.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are committing the basic fallacy of confusing correlation with evidence of a causative relationship. Just because two things happened in parallel doesn&#8217;t mean that one caused the other. This fallacy you fall for is at the heart of both your claims in the article and your claims concerning capitalism, meaning that unfortunately, your &#8220;arguments&#8221; are devoid of real evidence. It also troubles me that you consistently refer only to US agencies, and only to hand-picked ones. This suggests that you have to cherry-pick the data to make your point.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Allen, MD</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/02/medicare-health-care-deregulated.html#comment-125888</link> <dc:creator>David Allen, MD</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:47:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42519#comment-125888</guid> <description>No, I certainly would not prefer that millions be thrown into health insecurity - that is what my proposals would cut down on.Its funny that you should mention lines for tooth extractions, since the British public health system is having such a time of it (read:  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7189448.stm).  Notice there aren&#039;t such dramatic stories in this country!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I certainly would not prefer that millions be thrown into health insecurity &#8211; that is what my proposals would cut down on.</p><p>Its funny that you should mention lines for tooth extractions, since the British public health system is having such a time of it (read: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7189448.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7189448.stm</a>).  Notice there aren&#8217;t such dramatic stories in this country!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: medstudent</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/02/medicare-health-care-deregulated.html#comment-125884</link> <dc:creator>medstudent</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:07:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42519#comment-125884</guid> <description>Yes, I agree that cancer and heart attack would be equivalent to an accident in the analogy with car insurance, and would require health insurance to cover those unexpected and expensive costs.However, yearly check ups, flu, strep throat, maintenance of an otherwise stable chronic disease, these things are the majority of our health care dollars, and are the equivalent of getting an oil change in an aging car.  They aren&#039;t unexpected.  They don&#039;t require insurance.  It&#039;s just part and parcel of growing old.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree that cancer and heart attack would be equivalent to an accident in the analogy with car insurance, and would require health insurance to cover those unexpected and expensive costs.</p><p>However, yearly check ups, flu, strep throat, maintenance of an otherwise stable chronic disease, these things are the majority of our health care dollars, and are the equivalent of getting an oil change in an aging car.  They aren&#8217;t unexpected.  They don&#8217;t require insurance.  It&#8217;s just part and parcel of growing old.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Allen, MD</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/02/medicare-health-care-deregulated.html#comment-125877</link> <dc:creator>David Allen, MD</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:25:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42519#comment-125877</guid> <description>We all want affordable health care.  Ask yourself why it is so expensive.  I think a large part of the reason is the government&#039;s distortion of the market - as I&#039;ve outlined.  If you want affordable health care, then you should want to get the government out of the market.Keep in mind a beggar is morally superior to a robber - which is what government health care amounts to.  Given the choice, which will you choose?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all want affordable health care.  Ask yourself why it is so expensive.  I think a large part of the reason is the government&#8217;s distortion of the market &#8211; as I&#8217;ve outlined.  If you want affordable health care, then you should want to get the government out of the market.</p><p>Keep in mind a beggar is morally superior to a robber &#8211; which is what government health care amounts to.  Given the choice, which will you choose?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: djr</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/02/medicare-health-care-deregulated.html#comment-125835</link> <dc:creator>djr</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:09:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42519#comment-125835</guid> <description>&quot;I don&#039;t want your charity&quot; /=/ &quot;perhaps the solution is to reduce doctor&#039;s salaries&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t want your charity&#8221; /=/ &#8220;perhaps the solution is to reduce doctor&#8217;s salaries&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Uninsurable</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/02/medicare-health-care-deregulated.html#comment-125830</link> <dc:creator>Uninsurable</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 04:57:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42519#comment-125830</guid> <description>&quot;But, anyone in such a position MUST RELY ON THE CHARITY OF OTHERS.&quot;I don&#039;t want your charity.  Iwant affordable health care.  Your solution is for me to beg for help.And isn&#039;t that what we have now.  Those that can pay, pay more so doctors and hospitals can provide charity care.So perhaps the solution is to reduce doctor&#039;s salaries so they have to rely on charity to live.  Doesn&#039;t that make you feel good?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But, anyone in such a position MUST RELY ON THE CHARITY OF OTHERS.&#8221;</p><p>I don&#8217;t want your charity.  Iwant affordable health care.  Your solution is for me to beg for help.</p><p>And isn&#8217;t that what we have now.  Those that can pay, pay more so doctors and hospitals can provide charity care.</p><p>So perhaps the solution is to reduce doctor&#8217;s salaries so they have to rely on charity to live.  Doesn&#8217;t that make you feel good?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Allen</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/02/medicare-health-care-deregulated.html#comment-125811</link> <dc:creator>David Allen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:42:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42519#comment-125811</guid> <description>I&#039;m not against people who are unfortunate enough to be in a position that they must rely on the charity of others.  Indeed, i supply such charity nearly daily.  But, anyone in such a position MUST RELY ON THE CHARITY OF OTHERS.  That&#039;s not a cut down, just a different way of looking at the situation.  Any supposed &#039;right&#039; to health care necessarily denies the rights of others (who are forced to pay for it or supply it).  The &#039;right&#039; to health care is really the supposed right to force others to provide you with and pay for that care.I don&#039;t have &#039;fictional black and white choices&#039; - but I am thinking using principles and concepts.  Anyone who is against &#039;black and white&#039; choices has an antitheses to thinking with such principles.  But, it is essential to think using these abstract devices in order to figure out the &#039;in principle&#039; truths.  Once you have figured out how the world works, in principle (the right and the wrong of it, the black and the white of it) you then know what you are aiming for.  It may be true, that you have little chance of implementing your full views in a particular political climate - but it REALLY HELPS to know where you want to go and why.  Then, for any particular proposal, you know why you are supporting it and why.If you don&#039;t think at such a fundamental level, you may find yourself never thinking of real solutions to real health care problems, because they are not in vogue, or are too &#039;black and white&#039;.  Indeed, you may find you have boxed your thinking in so much that you cannot even see solutions proffered to you - they just won&#039;t  seem &#039;persuasive&#039; to you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not against people who are unfortunate enough to be in a position that they must rely on the charity of others.  Indeed, i supply such charity nearly daily.  But, anyone in such a position MUST RELY ON THE CHARITY OF OTHERS.  That&#8217;s not a cut down, just a different way of looking at the situation.  Any supposed &#8216;right&#8217; to health care necessarily denies the rights of others (who are forced to pay for it or supply it).  The &#8216;right&#8217; to health care is really the supposed right to force others to provide you with and pay for that care.</p><p>I don&#8217;t have &#8216;fictional black and white choices&#8217; &#8211; but I am thinking using principles and concepts.  Anyone who is against &#8216;black and white&#8217; choices has an antitheses to thinking with such principles.  But, it is essential to think using these abstract devices in order to figure out the &#8216;in principle&#8217; truths.  Once you have figured out how the world works, in principle (the right and the wrong of it, the black and the white of it) you then know what you are aiming for.  It may be true, that you have little chance of implementing your full views in a particular political climate &#8211; but it REALLY HELPS to know where you want to go and why.  Then, for any particular proposal, you know why you are supporting it and why.</p><p>If you don&#8217;t think at such a fundamental level, you may find yourself never thinking of real solutions to real health care problems, because they are not in vogue, or are too &#8216;black and white&#8217;.  Indeed, you may find you have boxed your thinking in so much that you cannot even see solutions proffered to you &#8211; they just won&#8217;t  seem &#8216;persuasive&#8217; to you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Uninsurable</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/02/medicare-health-care-deregulated.html#comment-125734</link> <dc:creator>Uninsurable</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:21:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42519#comment-125734</guid> <description>&quot;Let’s look at psychiatry.&quot;I just read a &quot;New Yorker&quot; article about mental health.  It&#039;s nice to know that shyness is now a mental health disorder.  Nice to see all those experts making a profit.Many mental health providers have gone cash only.  Their fees are more than those paid by insurance companies.  Isn&#039;t the theory that prices will drop when doctors accept cash?My insurance had limited mental health coverage.  During a period of severe depression, my benefits ran out.  Unable to afford treatment, I stopped treatment and dealt with my feelings of suicide on an internet support group.  I also bought a few books.  Perhaps in my case, the market worked.  I found an affordable treatment.This year, insurance regulations make mental health benefits on par with physcial illness.  I assume, Dr. Allen, that you are against such regulation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Let’s look at psychiatry.&#8221;</p><p>I just read a &#8220;New Yorker&#8221; article about mental health.  It&#8217;s nice to know that shyness is now a mental health disorder.  Nice to see all those experts making a profit.</p><p>Many mental health providers have gone cash only.  Their fees are more than those paid by insurance companies.  Isn&#8217;t the theory that prices will drop when doctors accept cash?</p><p>My insurance had limited mental health coverage.  During a period of severe depression, my benefits ran out.  Unable to afford treatment, I stopped treatment and dealt with my feelings of suicide on an internet support group.  I also bought a few books.  Perhaps in my case, the market worked.  I found an affordable treatment.</p><p>This year, insurance regulations make mental health benefits on par with physcial illness.  I assume, Dr. Allen, that you are against such regulation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 440/444 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 16:53:29 -->
