Good doctors sometimes may make patients unhappy

Most of us went into medicine because, in addition to being good students, we wanted to help people. How many oceans of ink and forests of paper have been used explaining that point to admissions committees we’ll never know. Suffice it to say, it felt very good when our professors wrote us glowing letters of recommendation. Of course, we were also saying, “I want to feel good about helping people. I want the recognition associated with the act of helping!” Premedical students, medical students, and physicians tend to be those people who desire accolades and who are naturally well-suited to attaining them.

It is deeply moving to hear patients say, “You saved my life.” Or for a parent to say, “My child is alive because you were there.” Those words light up the pleasure centers in our overachieving brains.

It was, therefore, painful for me to finally realize that people sometimes disliked me. In fact, sometimes they despised me! This is the great unspoken reality of the practice of medicine. We won’t always be liked. If you doubt it, walk around Walmart for a few days. Some of your former patients will hug you. Some will snarl at you. That’s life as a medical doctor.

It’s all too easy to suggest that patients won’t like us because we make mistakes. That’s a given but not necessarily the biggest contributor to our being disliked. No one likes when their doctor, or their mechanic, for that matter, makes a mistake. I remember the dentist who gave me a root canal on the wrong tooth. I was a little unhappy, but he had been the family dentist for years so I didn’t really have animosity toward him. I just had a bill and a hole in my tooth. (And not so much as a whiff of nitrous oxide!)

Anyone who analyzes malpractice will report that a physician can make a mistake, sometimes a pretty big one, and patients (and their families) will still forgive them. It’s mostly in the attitude you show toward them, the concern you display, the connection you establish.

Being disliked is not just about mistakes. Being disliked is about humanity and expectations. Humans often expect and desire things they shouldn’t have. Is that judgmental? I hope so. I went to school for a very long time to learn to make judgments and take responsibility for them. Should I be the arbiter of human desires? Maybe not, but as things stand, I have to be.

Here’s the reality. People frequently come to the emergency department because they want pain medication. Human beings have pain, addictions, and an occasional tendency to break the law by selling their medications. Because our government limits access to narcotics, I have to stand in the middle and make decisions about who does or does not receive them. This makes things ugly at times. I won’t be liked when I say no. I don’t even like saying no. I don’t like believing someone might lie to me. But one of my partners recently wrote a prescription for narcotics, and within an hour, the patient was caught, standing outside a pharmacy trying to sell his pills. To avoid that sort of possibility, I have to say no.

I have to say no when someone wants any drug or test that won’t work or may be bad for them. Occasionally I have to say no to CT scans, x-rays, and antibiotics. I try my best to explain my rationale. Usually it works. Sometimes it doesn’t. And bingo! I’m disliked. “Well, I just think I need some x-rays or blood tests.” I understand and respectfully disagree.

I even say no to school and work excuses. Frankly, that bruise shouldn’t limit anyone’s ability to check out groceries. And though my neuroanatomy might be a little rusty, I’m confident that teenaged student’s ankle sprain isn’t directly connected to his frontal lobes, and should not impair learning.

I think in the end saying “no” when “yes” is desired is what makes patient and families dislike us more than anything else we do.

The problem, however, is larger. We live in a culture of yes. We live in a culture of spoiled children of all ages who think that the only answer to any question is a resounding “yes.” Yes to admissions for convenience. Yes to endless care at no cost. Yes to validating non-diseases. The ridiculous parenting attitudes of the past 30 to 40 years translated into a society of adults who throw tantrums when they don’t get what they want, medically, personally, economically, or politically. And once they grow out of stomping their feet and holding their breath, they move on, and fill out angry satisfaction surveys or write scathing evaluations of their doctors or anyone who denies them, in anonymous online forums.

Administrators and academics, also educated and nurtured in the same country at the same time, also eager (as all of us are) to please, make policies that echo this hellish false-construct. If someone is unhappy because they were told no, then the person who told them no is at fault, is cruel, is judgmental, or intolerant, and should be reprimanded, punished, re-educated, or fired.

In our culturally misguided desire to please everyone, we wreck medicine, ruin the lives of patients, and seriously endanger our country with too many narcotics, too many drugs and tests, too many people on disability, and too many doctors (and politicians) struggling to avoid that most terrible of all accusations: “He didn’t give me what I wanted!”

The hard, liberating truth is this: Good doctors do the right thing. In the process, they may make patients unhappy. But if being liked and producing satisfaction on paper is the end-game for this great adventure of medicine, then we are seriously off course, and we can simply throw out all research and focus on the science of pleasure. Medicine can become one great big house of ill repute.

Ironically, if we think there is bias in corporate research or bias in our interactions with pharmaceutical representatives, we should open our eyes to the terrible cultural bias that expects us to answer every request with “yes.” That bias thinks good doctors are never disliked when it may well be that, contrary to popular thought, the best and the brightest are sometimes disliked and are still willing to say “no.”

Edwin Leap is an emergency physician who blogs at edwinleap.com.

Submit a guest post and be heard.

email

  • http://www.drjshousecalls.blogspot.com Dr. Mary Johnson

    My dear departed Pops (not a doctor) used to say that if you didn’t piss off at least one person a day, you were not doing your job right.

    Medicine is just not Walmart.

    Alas, I paid a fairly big price for saying no . . . to a local VIP who could not/would not take “NO” for an answer:

    The story is on the sidebar on my blog . . . “Part II: The Parent I Could Have/Should Have Sued For Libel”.

    There has got to be a better way than they way we’re doing things now.

  • Greg

    Well said, sir. Doctors, police officers, judges, and bankers are some of the professionals whose job it is to say no. “No, I won’t prescribe that vicodin to you.” “No, you can’t steal that car.” “No, you can’t have your freedom for the next 3-5 years.” And so on. A few years back, bankers figured they would get more clients if they started saying “yes,” and stopped saying “no.” “Yes, you can have that mortgage.” And basically it wrecked our economy.

    Doctors, take your lessons from bankers. Don’t stop saying “no,” or else society will suffer the consequences of your actions.

  • MB

    While I greatly appreciate all that you have gone through to be a doctor, and greatly respect your skills and knowledge, “No” is not always the right answer. Four doctors told me my problem was NOT what I thought it was, and wanted to treat me for something far more serious (cardiac disease…statins, blood pressure meds, beta blockers, anti-depressants). One doc gave me a chance and said “it will not hurt you if we give you a test run and try treating for (my simple hormone deficiency)”.

    Treatment started, problem solved. Even doc number 5 jaw dropped in amazement. Avoided terrible drug side effects, possible surgery, strokes, heart attack. Guess the disease. And tell me why so many people are still running around suffering from it when treating it is so simple and inexpensive…and not treating it can lead to terrible consequences.

  • http://www.drjshousecalls.blogspot.com Dr. Mary Johnson

    Good point about the bankers, Greg. But it would be nice if “society” would take doctor’s backs when we say, “No!”.

    Apart from my dance with the small town “VIP’, I spent 6 months “under investigation” by the N.C. Medical Board several years back, because I cut off a drug-seeking teenager (if memory serves, she was 19 or 20) . . . who was taking enough Phenergan on a daily basis to drop a small horse (for no good medical reason that I could ascertain in her chart). Moreover she was in the process of applying for disability (because her “medical condition” left her chronically tired).

    The terminally-ill Pediatrician I was subbing for/assisting (who had actually already discharged this girl from the practice – because she had aged out of it) was prescribing/refilling the stuff without paying any real attention to what he was doing.

    The girl heard there was a new doctor in the office and she thought she’d play the odds. Her “MO” was to show up late in the day without an appointment – she’d usually get worked-in and/or what she wanted. Disturbed/perplexed by what was going on (and alarmed by the sheer amount of the Phenergan she was taking), I called the local pharmacy (that was filling all her prescriptions). You could literally hear the sigh of relief on the other end of the phone, ala, “Thank God!!! someone has finally noticed this!!!”.

    Without going into all of the ugly details, after I refused to write any more prescriptions for Phenergan, started enforcing office policy re: appointments, and confirmed her discharge from the practice . . . documenting ALL of my detective work in the process . . . the girl reported me to the Medical Board for “abandonment”.

    She was going to “fix” me. It was my job to give her what she wanted when she wanted it.

    And the NCMB, being the NCMB, put me through the ringer for six months before dismissing the complaint as the abject rubbish it was. Every time I think about it, I bristle.

    Because you see, years earlier, the Board did not provide ANY assistance after I was fired for saving a baby’s life (by answering a worried nurse’s call and telling a “most-favored” FP who fancied himself a neonatologist, “NO! STOP! You are WRONG, and you do not know what you’re doing!).

    The Board, you see, doesn’t have any jurisdiction over anyone but the doctors. And they cannot make referrals to other law enforcement agencies when doctors are done wrong for doing their duty.

    And/so, “Don’t stop saying, no!” is easy advice to give. But in actual practice, saying “NO!” can have horrific consequences for a doctor.

    And despite all the “reform” bills, I don’t see anyone addressing this. In fact, it’s all about “patient satisfaction” these days . . . I’m hearing right now that Medicaid is going to start refusing to pay entire hospital bills if patients pose any complaints about their care.

    And that’s just absurd.

    Patients are not always right. Sometimes they can be quite wrong.

  • Tad

    Narcotics is a particularly problematic area for doctors. I have had chronic back pain for several years. We’ve tried all the standard medications and physical therapy. My orthopedist tells me surgical procedures are successful about half the time. The other half, you end up worse. He advised against it. Neither my orthopedist nor my internist was comfortable prescribing narcotics long-term, so I began seeing a pain mgt. physician.
    The pain Dr. put me on 4 Norco per day. While this was nice, it was a roller-coaster ride. I wanted something that lasts all day, but this Dr wouldnt prescribe it. He said I “didn’t want to go there”, suggesting a life of ever-increasing dosages and tolerance. Four Norco a day was all I could get. From a PAIN MGT Dr, no less.
    I switched to another one and this guy immediately recognized I was undertreated, put me on 40mg Oxycodone a day plus the 4 Norco, and life couldn’t be better.
    Since then I’ve done my own research, and found this:
    “Chronic pain is regularly undertreated:”… “Most prescribers are reluctant to adequately treat chronic pain… because the patient will become tolerant and need more and more to get pain relief. Such responses bespeak a fundamental misunderstanding of chronic pain and opioids”
    Opioids, Pain Management, & Addiction
    Jennifer P. Schneider, MD, PhD
    Pain Practitioner, Winter 2006-2007, 16:17-24

    A pain management physician should know more about pain management than I do. I dislike my first pain mgt doc precisely because he should have known better.
    Its not that you won’t prescribe what we want, its often that you won’t prescribe what we need, and what works, out of irrational fears based on a minority of cases.
    I wouldn’t expect an internist to know everything about opiods and the treatment of chronic pain, but a pain management physician has no excuse.

  • http://healthandbeautydoc.blogspot.com/ Dr. Veronica

    interesting. many of my patients come to my office with bags!(and i mean it), bags of supplement. i call it polypharmacy in naturopathic medicine. at first i was shy to say “no” to 70% of supplements, but not any more. as a result, i often see, that many of my patients almost relieved when i say no to all those supplements. it simplifies their life. on the other hand, i create a plan for the patient, i call it “plan to get better”, plan that make sense to both of us. and its make my job to say “no” to a numerous supl. easy.

  • Fray

    “It’s mostly in the attitude you show toward them, the concern you display, the connection you establish.”

    I have met very few doctors that put any type of effort to establish a connection. If my needs vary from the typical textbook case, those needs remain unmet.

    As for mistakes-when my dentist also made a mistake…he fixed it, no charge. Most of the doctors I have met will not even admit they made a mistake. I have been misdiagnosed 5 times and much of the blame was put on me and I was shoved out the door. I am grateful for the one doctor that stood by me after making a mistake.

    “We live in a culture of spoiled children of all ages who think that the only answer to any question is a resounding “yes.””

    I want a partnership where the best decisions are made for my particular health issues. I often run into doctors that aren’t willing to have an discussion with me because they make steroetypes like the one above. I don’t want “yes,” I want an intellegent reason why something isn’t necesary.

  • http://www.bryantsstatisticalconsulting.com Tex Bryant

    No doubt those who are “doing the right thing” sometimes face terrible consequences. I think that was keenly illustrated in Shakespeare’s play Othello. Othello murdered his faithful wife Desdemona after his mind was poisoned by Iago. Life is not always fair.

  • http://lockupdoc.com Lockup Doc

    Well said, Dr. Leap. Generally speaking, we physicians want to be liked and want our patients to be satisfied. But the goal really should be good medical care, not placation. Fortunately most of the time it’s possible to arrive at a mutually agreeable plan. There will be other times, though, in any specialty where physicians must set limits in order to avoid prescribing unnecessary, costly, and potentially harmful diagnostic or treatment interventions. It’s our responsibility as doctors to see that we do the right thing. (I wonder how much money the U.S. really could save if we all avoided doing the unnecessary or inappropriate…) And being able to set appropriate limits is crucial for anyone providing treatment in correctional settings.

  • W

    Acceptance of personal responsibility is a good thing, whether you’re the patient or the doctor. Increasingly, I find that every piece of paper I receive from our local clinic, every web site they create, every sign in their offices, includes some variation on “We take no responsibility…” And I’m supposed to trust these people to make good choices about my health? I’m supposed to shut up, be 100% compliant, never question anything, never try to break through the rush-rush-rush in the hope that something I say might actually lead to a faster, more accurate diagnosis?

    If you’re saying “no” to patients who’re just feeding a drug habit (and I’d hesitate to call those people patients), good for you. If you’re saying “no” to accepting responsibility for the choices you make in the career you’ve chosen…it’s not that easy.

  • http://drpullen.com Edward

    There are lots of ways to say no, empathetically, sarcastically, as a “know-it-all” doctor. Many times we can get to no and the patient will at least understand our reason and “empathize” with us for making the right choice, even if it is not the choice they want. Admittedly sometimes we will just leave them angry, but I find this seldom if I am “on may game” and do a good job of making sure the patient knows I have made a reasonable medical opinion that is just different from the one they wanted.

  • SarahW

    Sometimes I think we ought to re-think the gate-keeper status of physicians to pharmaceuticals. It certainly would solve a lot of problems if abusers, who tend to remain a fairly steady percentage of the population, could feed their habits legally and face the consequence that are natural to their situation. Prudent people in real pain would then seek out a doctors attention and guidance for pain relief and be more likely to not only follow a safe regimen willingly, but to get needed relief currently denied them because physicians want to avoid encouraging lying and cheating addicts, and the heavy hand of the law coming down to hassle them thoroughly.

  • http://www.drjshousecalls.blogspot.com Dr. Mary Johnson

    “We take no responsibility” is ALL about the lawyers and the uber-lititgious environment doctors practice in and hospitals/pharm companies currently operate under.

    Wanna fix it? How about some tort reform?

    But it’s just one of MANY things that is NOT in the House/Senate Healthcare reform bills that the team of Obama/Pelosi/Reid have tried to ram down our throats.

    Even now, in the wake of “the big one” in MASS yesterday, Obama is saying it’s “full speed ahead”.

    That’s exactly what the captain of the Titanic said.

  • http://beachbirdiescove.blogspot.com MB

    Wanna fix it? How about some tort reform?

    But it’s just one of MANY things that is NOT in the House/Senate Healthcare reform bills that the team of Obama/Pelosi/Reid have tried to ram down our throats…..That’s exactly what the captain of the Titanic said.

    Well said.

  • http://www.patmosemergiclinic.com Robert Berry, MD

    Dr. Leap said it well:

    “Because our government limits access to narcotics, I have to stand in the middle and make decisions about who does or does not receive them. This makes things ugly at times.”

    So ugly that about a month ago a rural physician in Kentucky was shot dead in his office by a patient for whom he had refused to write a narcotic prescription. As a primary care and ER doc, alot of visits are about pain meds. In my practice, I do not take any new patients who require a narcotic on a regular basis, but I turn away patients daily with legitimate pain and stacks of records and MRI’s. Perhaps with the best of intentions has government decided to force doctors to decide who gets and does not get narcotic painkillers. The downside to this is:

    1) puts doctors, nurses, and patients with narcotics at risk to having violence committed against them
    2) keeps legitimate pain patients from receiving the care they need
    3) encourages an underground economy that rewards potentially productive people for providing no real useful service
    4) wastes a sustantial portion of the clinical time of primary care physicians when this time is already in short supply
    5) fills our jails with opioid abusers.

    Now…no one wants people to become addicted to narcotics. But is it the role of government to protect these people against themselves given the five “downsides” above and given the fact that this policy has not prevented narcotic addiction?

    Maybe it is time for therapeutic narcotics to be dispensed in ways alcohol is and so take doctors out of the loop, allow legitimate pain patients unfettered access to the treatment they need, and decriminalize an activity the govt has not been able to prevent so addicts can get the treatment they need and return them to taxpaying jobs in the economy rather than tax consuming inmates in our prisons.

  • richard md

    Best post I have ever read. Our hospital calls back every pt from the ER & asks how everything was. Pt’s say nasty things especially when they left the ER cursing me because I looked them up on “Inspect” & found that they were pill shopping. Administration wants our satisfaction to be 90% but that is probably not realistic. I am comforted that I am not alone in being villified for saying no; and I believe as you do that i should continue to do so when my judgement says so.
    Thanks for this post.

  • skepticus

    Doctors are only bad when they restrict in unjustifiable ways human choice. If people want to get addicted to pain meds, it’s their business–not doctors, not the governments. Making doctors government agents is absurd. Doctors are a retail service–and when we forget that, these “conundrums’ emerge.

    CT scans? Make people pay for them out of pocket. Problem solved.

  • http://wavebehind.org/ Allen

    There are too many situations to judge saying “no” or “yes”, though “say no” is a simple way to review a doctor.

    I did a brief intro of this essay here in chinese.

Trending