<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s iPad health impact for doctors and hospitals</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/01/apples-ipad-health-impact-doctors-hospitals.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/01/apples-ipad-health-impact-doctors-hospitals.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Drew Griffin</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/01/apples-ipad-health-impact-doctors-hospitals.html#comment-125485</link> <dc:creator>Drew Griffin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:52:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42384#comment-125485</guid> <description>I think the iPad is a game changer! Despite the lack of some features that would enhance the functionality (which will undoubtedly be included in future generations of the device), this can certainly impact delivery of quality and efficient health care.As a Wound Care Certified Nurse, I often have to educate patients about their health conditions. Additionally there is an EMR task involved. The portability and interface is simplistic and functional. We are only seeing the beginning possibilities at this time. I can&#039;t wait to develop applications for this interface. It makes sense.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the iPad is a game changer! Despite the lack of some features that would enhance the functionality (which will undoubtedly be included in future generations of the device), this can certainly impact delivery of quality and efficient health care.</p><p>As a Wound Care Certified Nurse, I often have to educate patients about their health conditions. Additionally there is an EMR task involved. The portability and interface is simplistic and functional. We are only seeing the beginning possibilities at this time. I can&#8217;t wait to develop applications for this interface. It makes sense.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kp</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/01/apples-ipad-health-impact-doctors-hospitals.html#comment-124213</link> <dc:creator>kp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 02:18:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42384#comment-124213</guid> <description>Handwriting recognition anyone?  I don&#039;t believe turning your back on a patient and typing is ideal.  The last time I was at my doctor&#039;s office he was so rushed to type he forgot 3 of the referrals he was to give me.  I had to call back to get them arranged.  His nurse had to ask him again.  A waste of my time and his.  What good is an emr for safety of you are rushed and forget pertinent items and forget orders or prescriptions?  He had allowed extra time for me and things still got lost in the shuffle.  As he can attest,  that computer is a detriment to his practice.  Somehow I believe dictation with a transcriptionist&#039;s input into the emr is the way to go.  Let each professional do what they do best. The records are there, but it doesn&#039;t disrupt the encounter.  A doctor is there for his ability to diagnose and treat, not type.  Typing is the waste of a valuable intellect.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Handwriting recognition anyone?  I don&#8217;t believe turning your back on a patient and typing is ideal.  The last time I was at my doctor&#8217;s office he was so rushed to type he forgot 3 of the referrals he was to give me.  I had to call back to get them arranged.  His nurse had to ask him again.  A waste of my time and his.  What good is an emr for safety of you are rushed and forget pertinent items and forget orders or prescriptions?  He had allowed extra time for me and things still got lost in the shuffle.  As he can attest,  that computer is a detriment to his practice.  Somehow I believe dictation with a transcriptionist&#8217;s input into the emr is the way to go.  Let each professional do what they do best. The records are there, but it doesn&#8217;t disrupt the encounter.  A doctor is there for his ability to diagnose and treat, not type.  Typing is the waste of a valuable intellect.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Leor Feder</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/01/apples-ipad-health-impact-doctors-hospitals.html#comment-124183</link> <dc:creator>Leor Feder</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:49:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42384#comment-124183</guid> <description>R Watkins I agree with you.  A pen and paper can arguably be the worst thing for patients.  A dr. with lots of notes and handwritten sticky sheets are the enemy toward making the patient consultation safer and more efficient. I don&#039;t think a dr. scribbling notes pays more attention than a dr. typing. Now imagine what would happen if your physician is on vacation and you have a situation that needs immediate care... the interim physician taking care of you may not be able to read or even find the handwritten notes your dr. wrote.  Dr. records need to be electronic, it can even be argued that it saves lives...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R Watkins I agree with you.  A pen and paper can arguably be the worst thing for patients.  A dr. with lots of notes and handwritten sticky sheets are the enemy toward making the patient consultation safer and more efficient. I don&#8217;t think a dr. scribbling notes pays more attention than a dr. typing. Now imagine what would happen if your physician is on vacation and you have a situation that needs immediate care&#8230; the interim physician taking care of you may not be able to read or even find the handwritten notes your dr. wrote.  Dr. records need to be electronic, it can even be argued that it saves lives&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kp</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/01/apples-ipad-health-impact-doctors-hospitals.html#comment-124171</link> <dc:creator>kp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:09:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42384#comment-124171</guid> <description>The ipad may just be the jumping off point for something better - in the future.  Apple tends to be very incremental in improvements such as with the iphone.  I could see them coming out with a more expensive product just geared to the medical community down the road.  So far, reviewers are commenting on how difficult it is to type on the ipad&#039;s virtual keyboard with any speed or accuracy.  Viewing test results, xrays, etc. - works very well, but so do the computers that exist now.  To be a game changer the ipad needs a user friendly and natural input device. Doctor&#039;s need to be able to input with one hand, not have to turn away and plop it down to input data.  It should help facilitate doctor and patient communication, not stand between them, slow the doctor down, have him turn his back to the patient, or spend his time giving his patient only half his attention while the patient is speaking and the doctor is trying to type and listen at the same time.  After all, patients just want to be listened to with 100% focus.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ipad may just be the jumping off point for something better &#8211; in the future.  Apple tends to be very incremental in improvements such as with the iphone.  I could see them coming out with a more expensive product just geared to the medical community down the road.  So far, reviewers are commenting on how difficult it is to type on the ipad&#8217;s virtual keyboard with any speed or accuracy.  Viewing test results, xrays, etc. &#8211; works very well, but so do the computers that exist now.  To be a game changer the ipad needs a user friendly and natural input device. Doctor&#8217;s need to be able to input with one hand, not have to turn away and plop it down to input data.  It should help facilitate doctor and patient communication, not stand between them, slow the doctor down, have him turn his back to the patient, or spend his time giving his patient only half his attention while the patient is speaking and the doctor is trying to type and listen at the same time.  After all, patients just want to be listened to with 100% focus.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dustin Burke</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/01/apples-ipad-health-impact-doctors-hospitals.html#comment-124168</link> <dc:creator>Dustin Burke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:51:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42384#comment-124168</guid> <description>The current generation iPad I don&#039;t think meets the needs of the majority of health care providers (IMHO, at least for physical therapists and other &quot;hands on&quot; professionals).  I consulted at a medium-sized Physical Therapy Center and recommended the EMR and tablet PC solution for the clinical director (this was in 2005 so they were early adopters of the technology).  Physical therapists are VERY hands-on and always on their feet.  They were using paper and pen to record their daily notes and had lots of concerns about replacing with tablets.  Tablets are heavier than a clipboard, breakable when dropped, took awhile to learn the (not user-friendly) software and just didn&#039;t fit within their standard workflow.  Most would constantly toss their clipboards down to assist and focus on the patient, something not possible with a tablet.  Rather than seamlessly and transparently assisting the clinician (to make them better at their job), the technology was an impedance.The iPad has the potential to be revolutionary in health care but it must allow verbal dictation (voice-to-text) for note taking and figure out an equivalent touch experience for one-handed stylus data input.  Right now the iPad needs to be placed down on something to type - you can&#039;t hold it in one hand and write on it like you can with a stylus.  Also, one-handed portability is a concern.  The iPad would need a rubberized back (perhaps a case could solve this) and/or a contoured body for better ergonomics holding it.Otherwise, it would be hard to justify replacing the existing wall-mounted flat panel LCD screens and keyboard shelf with an iPad and keyboard dock.&quot;Better is the enemy of good enough&quot; - Voltaire (misquoted)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current generation iPad I don&#8217;t think meets the needs of the majority of health care providers (IMHO, at least for physical therapists and other &#8220;hands on&#8221; professionals).  I consulted at a medium-sized Physical Therapy Center and recommended the EMR and tablet PC solution for the clinical director (this was in 2005 so they were early adopters of the technology).  Physical therapists are VERY hands-on and always on their feet.  They were using paper and pen to record their daily notes and had lots of concerns about replacing with tablets.  Tablets are heavier than a clipboard, breakable when dropped, took awhile to learn the (not user-friendly) software and just didn&#8217;t fit within their standard workflow.  Most would constantly toss their clipboards down to assist and focus on the patient, something not possible with a tablet.  Rather than seamlessly and transparently assisting the clinician (to make them better at their job), the technology was an impedance.</p><p>The iPad has the potential to be revolutionary in health care but it must allow verbal dictation (voice-to-text) for note taking and figure out an equivalent touch experience for one-handed stylus data input.  Right now the iPad needs to be placed down on something to type &#8211; you can&#8217;t hold it in one hand and write on it like you can with a stylus.  Also, one-handed portability is a concern.  The iPad would need a rubberized back (perhaps a case could solve this) and/or a contoured body for better ergonomics holding it.</p><p>Otherwise, it would be hard to justify replacing the existing wall-mounted flat panel LCD screens and keyboard shelf with an iPad and keyboard dock.</p><p>&#8220;Better is the enemy of good enough&#8221; &#8211; Voltaire (misquoted)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: R Watkins</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/01/apples-ipad-health-impact-doctors-hospitals.html#comment-124164</link> <dc:creator>R Watkins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:34:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42384#comment-124164</guid> <description>&quot;What was the ‘gold standard’ of patient communication? The pad and pen. Sit down, face the patient, and write your notes on a pad of paper. &quot;I disagree. Handwritten notes, whether with pen and paper or with the iPad, are incredibly tedious due to current documentation and liability concerns.The best and most efficient system to date is for the doc to sit down in front of the patient, maintain eye contact, and concentrate 100% on what the patient says. Aside from brief scribbles on a scrap of paper, the doc relies on his ability to remember. After the visit is over, the doc immediately dictates a note, talking a blue streak that can be understood by a trained transcriptionist, again focussing only on this one task.Any system that requires ANY degree of data entry in the chart by the doc is a step backwards: it inevitably means less time and attention for the patient.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What was the ‘gold standard’ of patient communication? The pad and pen. Sit down, face the patient, and write your notes on a pad of paper. &#8221;</p><p>I disagree. Handwritten notes, whether with pen and paper or with the iPad, are incredibly tedious due to current documentation and liability concerns.</p><p>The best and most efficient system to date is for the doc to sit down in front of the patient, maintain eye contact, and concentrate 100% on what the patient says. Aside from brief scribbles on a scrap of paper, the doc relies on his ability to remember. After the visit is over, the doc immediately dictates a note, talking a blue streak that can be understood by a trained transcriptionist, again focussing only on this one task.</p><p>Any system that requires ANY degree of data entry in the chart by the doc is a step backwards: it inevitably means less time and attention for the patient.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tex Bryant</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/01/apples-ipad-health-impact-doctors-hospitals.html#comment-124145</link> <dc:creator>Tex Bryant</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:09:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42384#comment-124145</guid> <description>I believe that Jen Ward and kp hit upon some important ideas and questions--how easy is it for a provider to input data using an iPad and how much interference does it create between physician or nurse and the patient?  Nurses that I have talked to in hospitals love the EMR&#039;s that they use.  My PCP used his laptop the other day to access my records and input data.  I found it useful for my visit as he could pull up data from my recent blood work for my physical and discuss it with me easily.  From these experiences, I believe that the iPad will improve the functionality of EMR&#039;s.Since many sites will be adopting EMR&#039;s in the near future, it is perhaps the right tool at the right time.  As indicated in one comment, some EMR vendors seem to believe that it will be a good tool for use with their software.  With Apple&#039;s penchant for hitting &quot;home runs&quot; consistently with their product line, I think that it will probably have a positive impact on providing better healthcare and improve the bottom line for the provider.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that Jen Ward and kp hit upon some important ideas and questions&#8211;how easy is it for a provider to input data using an iPad and how much interference does it create between physician or nurse and the patient?  Nurses that I have talked to in hospitals love the EMR&#8217;s that they use.  My PCP used his laptop the other day to access my records and input data.  I found it useful for my visit as he could pull up data from my recent blood work for my physical and discuss it with me easily.  From these experiences, I believe that the iPad will improve the functionality of EMR&#8217;s.</p><p>Since many sites will be adopting EMR&#8217;s in the near future, it is perhaps the right tool at the right time.  As indicated in one comment, some EMR vendors seem to believe that it will be a good tool for use with their software.  With Apple&#8217;s penchant for hitting &#8220;home runs&#8221; consistently with their product line, I think that it will probably have a positive impact on providing better healthcare and improve the bottom line for the provider.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gc</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/01/apples-ipad-health-impact-doctors-hospitals.html#comment-124140</link> <dc:creator>gc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:43:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42384#comment-124140</guid> <description>@ kpI think we&#039;re actually missing the point here in viewing this as a mere extension of current computing trends. Most patients hate it when the doctor is merely watching a screen and typing while talking to them, and few doctors can do it at speed. What was the &#039;gold standard&#039; of patient communication? The pad and pen. Sit down, face the patient, and write your notes on a pad of paper. Unfortunately, that does not lend itself to EMR.Well the iPad now gives us a way to do so. Hand-writing recognition software has been getting better and better, and with a market incentive like the iPad spurring innovation, we can reasonably expect it to be acceptably accurate (99%) within a few years. Take the iPad and a stylus, scan in the paper forms we&#039;re all used to using (along with a box for freehand notes! what a concept) and voila, we&#039;re back to the good old days while simultaneously being EMR compliant and tethered to the mainframe!Words can&#039;t express how my excitement (and that of the patients I&#039;ve discussed this with).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ kp</p><p>I think we&#8217;re actually missing the point here in viewing this as a mere extension of current computing trends. Most patients hate it when the doctor is merely watching a screen and typing while talking to them, and few doctors can do it at speed. What was the &#8216;gold standard&#8217; of patient communication? The pad and pen. Sit down, face the patient, and write your notes on a pad of paper. Unfortunately, that does not lend itself to EMR.</p><p>Well the iPad now gives us a way to do so. Hand-writing recognition software has been getting better and better, and with a market incentive like the iPad spurring innovation, we can reasonably expect it to be acceptably accurate (99%) within a few years. Take the iPad and a stylus, scan in the paper forms we&#8217;re all used to using (along with a box for freehand notes! what a concept) and voila, we&#8217;re back to the good old days while simultaneously being EMR compliant and tethered to the mainframe!</p><p>Words can&#8217;t express how my excitement (and that of the patients I&#8217;ve discussed this with).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/01/apples-ipad-health-impact-doctors-hospitals.html#comment-124096</link> <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 04:41:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42384#comment-124096</guid> <description>Two things: One, I think it&#039;s a bit premature to conjecture on the iPad&#039;s impact on medicine just yet. As far as I&#039;m concerned, this will be a mere footnote, though it may lay some groundwork for future iterations of medical hardware. Two, this reads more like sales copy than anything really informative.But hey, I was an HDDVD early adopter, so what do I know?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things:<br /> One, I think it&#8217;s a bit premature to conjecture on the iPad&#8217;s impact on medicine just yet. As far as I&#8217;m concerned, this will be a mere footnote, though it may lay some groundwork for future iterations of medical hardware.<br /> Two, this reads more like sales copy than anything really informative.</p><p>But hey, I was an HDDVD early adopter, so what do I know?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jrm</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/01/apples-ipad-health-impact-doctors-hospitals.html#comment-124085</link> <dc:creator>jrm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:16:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=42384#comment-124085</guid> <description>Like EMRs in general, handing out iPads for patient registration sounds like a great idea. After the first four or five are stolen, you may not think it&#039;s so great. It&#039;s very easy for patients to rationalize stealing from &quot;rich&quot; doctors.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like EMRs in general, handing out iPads for patient registration sounds like a great idea. After the first four or five are stolen, you may not think it&#8217;s so great. It&#8217;s very easy for patients to rationalize stealing from &#8220;rich&#8221; doctors.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 440/444 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 20:16:58 -->
