10 cost effective preventive medicine services

Here are the top 10 preventive services. These items were chosen by the National Commission on Prevention Priorities, and highlight those preventive services including immunizations, screenings, preventive medications, and counseling that give “the most bang for the buck.”

For an in depth discussion of methods and results, read Am J Prev Med 2006;31(1):52–61

Discuss Daily Aspirin Use

This counseling does not mean everyone should take aspirin to prevent heart attack and stroke, but rather that individuals at moderate to high risk should weigh with their doctors the risks of bleeding and ulcers against the benefits of reducing cardiovascular disease. Heart attacks, strokes, and peripheral arterial disease accounts for over 900,000 deaths in the United States each year. According to UpToDate, net benefits of aspirin have been proven in secondary prevention for those who’ve already suffered a heart attack, occlusive stroke, TIA, angina, or coronary bypass surgery. Acute ischemic syndromes such as acute MI, unstable angina, and acute occlusive stroke also benefit.

Aspirin use for primary prevention of a first cardiovascular disease event is the most controversial, with recent trends favoring only using aspirin for those found to be at moderate to high risk. The National Commission estimates that “Physicians advising all high-risk adults to consider taking aspirin would save 80,000 lives annually and result in a net medical cost savings of $70 per person advised.”

The discussion with a doctor if aspirin is appropriate for you is very tricky, and is currently undergoing some changes based on new evidence, but the discussion may save your life, either way.

Childhood Immunization

The Advisory Committee recommends vaccinations against hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), polio, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella (chicken pox), pneumonia, and influenza for average risk children. This series is cost- saving and highly effective, and has made childhood deaths and suffering from the above diseases rare. Immunizing children also protects the health of the community, including those who are too young to be vaccinated or cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons, as circulating epidemics cannot easily take hold in an immune population.

Smoking Cessation Advice and Help to Quit

The harms of smoking are self-evident. It is estimated that smoking results in $100 billion annually in medical costs. Smoking also creates collateral damage to those non-smokers passively exposed. Clinicians should screen all adults to determine if they smoke or use other tobacco products, provide brief counseling, and offer patients nicotine replacement therapies and referrals to help them quit. What is most frustrating is that nicotine, as addictive as heroin and cocaine, is tolerated at all by our society – and that many health insurance companies will not pay for smoking cessation counseling or meds to help patients quit.

Screening for Alcohol Misuse and Brief Counseling

15% of adults report excessive drinking binges, more commonly in younger adults but still quite prevalent in older. Harmful alcohol use is associated with violence, accidents, injuries, deaths and disability, social disruption, and health problems. Many doctors consider more than 7 drinks/week or 3 drinks/occasion risky for women, and 14 drinks/week or 4 drinks/occasion hazardous for men, but in the context of certain activities like driving no amount is safe. Many people are unaware that their alcohol use is excessive and will change their habits when a doctor points it out.

Colorectal Cancer Screening

Colonoscopy remains the gold standard for early detection and prevention of colon cancer, although other options include fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy. Colon cancer is the 3rd highest incident cancer in the U.S. with 160,000 new cases in 2008, and 55,000 deaths. 19,000 deaths could be prevented each year if people over age 50 were periodically screened as recommended. It is estimated that only 1/3 of adults are up to date with screening. The risks of colon perforation are quite small but should be discussed with the doctor.

Hypertension Screening

It recommended that blood pressure be measured routinely in all adults over 18 and that anti-hypertension medications be taken to prevent the incidence of cardiovascular disease. 30% of American adults have hypertension, resulting in at least $100 billion in medical costs. Due to various factors only 1/3rd of hypertension cases are controlled. Many suitable generic medicines exist in this category. A low salt diet, weight loss, and exercise are also very effective means to lower blood pressure.

Influenza Immunization

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends annual flu shots for those adults over 50 years of age, women who will be pregnant during the flu season, persons with certain chronic medical conditions, children 6 months to 18 years old, and several other important adult and pediatric groups you can review at the CDC. Influenza contributes to 35,000 deaths in the U.S. each year, many hospitalizations, absenteeism and presenteeism at work. The flu shot has been proven to protect against getting the flu to varying degrees based upon patient characteristics and each year’s serological match.

Vision Screening

Recommended especially for elderly persons using a Snellen acuity test (the one that hangs on the wall). Very cost effective, and vision correction can reduce hip fractures from falls, improve quality of life, reduce accidents, help with proper use of medication bottles, and increase activities such as exercise. Up to 25% of older people wear inappropriate visual correction.

Cervical Cancer Screening

While the starting age and interval between Pap smears is currently in debate again, screening for cervical cancer in women is certainly effective. It is largely responsible for the 50% decline in cervical cancer mortality over the past 30 years. Further long-term benefits remain to be studied for the HPV vaccination series, but this also looks quite promising for women. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology released new guidelines just last month, but these are still quite new and your doctor may advise more frequent screenings.

Cholesterol Screening

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommends: “Screen routinely for lipid disorders among all men aged 35+ and all women aged 45+. Also screen men aged 20-35 and women aged 20-45 if they have other risk factors for coronary heart disease. Treat with lipid-lowering drugs to prevent the incidence of cardiovascular disease.”

The facts cited by the report are convincing:

~21% of adults age 35+ have high cholesterol. Of these, most will develop high cholesterol before age 55.

~One out of 4 adults who do not control their high cholesterol will have a cholesterol-attributable heart attack. One out of 3 will die of cholesterol-attributable coronary heart disease.

~Long-term use of therapies is necessary to achieve maximum benefits of screening

There you have it, the top ten preventive services for the U.S. population, ranked based upon an evidence-based analysis of costs and impacts of benefits and harms.

Other clinical preventive services that are valuable include pneumococcal vaccination, breast cancer screening for women (also recently controversial in terms of risks/benefits), chlamydia screening for sexually active women under age 25, discussing calcium supplementation, vision screening for preschool children, discussing folic acid supplementation for women of childbearing age, obesity screening in adults with high-intensity counseling about diet and exercise, depression screening, hearing screening in adults over 65, injury prevention counseling for parents of children 0-4 years of age, osteoporosis screening of women over 60-65, diabetes screening, diet counseling, and tetanus-diptheria boosters. Interestingly, PSA testing did not make the list. Most doctors still order this test annually in the absence of a better option for men, perhaps out of fear of missing prostate cancer and getting sued for it, regardless of the thorny question of whether early detection and treatment prolongs life. Until we have medical malpractice reform, perhaps in the form of specialized healthcare courts, doctors are still judged by lay juries and not scientific evidence when the inevitable bad things happen… but I digress.

You can review all the rankings by visiting the website directly. CPB is clinically preventable burden, or the disease, injury and premature death that would be prevented if the service were delivered to all people in the target population. CE is cost effectiveness, which is a standard measure for comparing services’ return on investment. The rankings are based on both CPB and CE. Services with the same total score tied in the rankings:

10 = highest impact, most cost effective among these evidence-based preventive services

2 = lowest impact, least cost effective among these evidence-based preventive services.

You will notice that full body CT scanning and taking twenty different vitamins did not make the list. Hopefully these rankings put things in perspective for policy makers, and serve as a starting point for future discussions with your doctor. Apples are good, too, and I recommend the Honey Crisp variety.

Dr. Charles is a family physician who blogs at The Examining Room of Dr. Charles.

Submit a guest post and be heard.

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

  • Scientist

    The website you are referencing as well as your above excerpts are wrong regarding cholesterol screening for women as well as hypertension recommendations. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force DOES NOT Recommend: “Screen routinely for lipid disorders among all men aged 35+ and all women aged 45+. Instead, the USPSTF “strongly recommends screening women aged 45 and older for lipid disorders IF they are at INCREASED RISK FOR CORONARY HEART DISEASE.” There is a HUGE difference in these two recommendations.
    Next, the referenced website states (implies) the USPSTF “recommend that blood pressure be measured routinely in all adults over 18 and that anti-hypertension medications be taken to prevent the incidence of cardiovascular disease.” NO THEY DO NOT. They only recommend screening and then discuss ways (pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical) ways of lowering blood pressure. They do not recommend anti-hypertension medications with a Grade “A”! The referenced website is full of other such errors. I’m a little alarmed that an MD would not have even noticed these discrepencies before posting these preventive screening recommendations.

  • Doc99

    Regarding colon cancer screenings, whoever develops a truly noninvasive screen to replace the colonoscopy and its odious prep will win the Nobel Prize.

  • ninguem

    What’s the status of stool genetic testing for cancer?

  • http://theexaminingroom.com drcharles

    Thanks for posting. The overall message is simply that there are ways of stratifying preventive services by importance, and that one such definition of ‘importance’ can be the synthesis of cost-effectiveness and preventable disease burden. Rather than quibble or parse through the exact wordings of USPSTF guidelines, I think the larger question was ‘what services provide the most bang for the buck?’ This is what the National Commission on Prevention Priorities came up with. Perhaps your “alarm” would be best directed at these folks, whose resumes and credentials are quite respectable. Lifestyle modification and counseling people to take better care of themselves are important in addition to considering meds, as stated above in multiple arenas. Prescriptions drugs are really not mentioned in many of the top ten (2?) so there goes the conspiracy theory.

    The ‘odious’ colonoscopy – I don’t want one either, but the alternatives as you know aren’t much more pleasant. Personally I’d like to avoid the radiation of the less invasive CT virtual colonoscopy, but the unpleasant prep remains. Fortunately colon cancer rates continue to drop as a result of better screening. I’m not sure about the status of stool genetic testing except that it is not part of the major guidelines yet. Would make for good future blogging.
    Thanks KMD.

  • Fray

    One size fits all medicine…no thanks.

  • Scientist

    “one such definition of ‘importance’ can be the synthesis of cost-effectiveness and preventable disease burden. Rather than quibble or parse through the exact wordings of USPSTF guidelines, I think the larger question was ‘what services provide the most bang for the buck?’”

    But this is exactly my point of parsing through the exact wordings of the guidelines. The USPSTF guidelines are based on the premise it is cost effective and “efficacious” to screen women over age 45 that are at INCREASED RISK OF CHD for elevated cholesterol. The evidence suggests otherwise for women that are not at increased risk. If the National Commission “feels” (I say feel, because there is little evidence to support it) all women should be screened then they should just say so without misrepresenting the USPSTF’s recommendations.

    My point is not to discourage preventive services for those with increased risk, but rather to discourage this trend of screening “well” people with no other risk factors for diseases. We have limited health care resources to treat the truly sick. If we attempt to screen and then “treat” conditions that have a neglible chance of increasing morbidity and mortality (but the treatments/screenings have a greater chance of doing harm) then not only does it bankrupt our system but also hurts the very few people that are still well!

  • http://theexaminingroom.com drcharles

    point taken. I would once again look at the big picture. I don’t think cholesterol screenings are the source of our hemorrhaging medical costs, and with the recent JUPITER study showing the importance of other cardiac risk markers such as CRP levels, the assessment of outwardly visible increased risk is only going to become more nuanced. I guess that’s what “Fray” was alluding to?

    Anyway, be well.

  • Fray

    “I guess that’s what “Fray” was alluding to?”

    No. I exercise, eat the food I grow in my garden, have a BMI of 19.2, can still run a fast mile, female and in my 40′s. I don’t smoke and drink very little. It’s a waste of time to check my cholesterol. I am not going to make any lifestyle changes that would decrease my risk of heart disease and I am certainly not going to take medication.

    As an athlete, I am prone to muscle/skeletal problems but the doctors I have seen are too busy checking my cholesterol instead of preventing overuse injuries.

  • http://theexaminingroom.com drcharles

    Might want to get your garden soil tested for heavy metals if you live near a road/city and that’s where all your food comes from, lots of lead in some areas. That’s gardening advice:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/14/garden/14lead.html

    Overuse. There’s a riddle in that word…

  • http://www.sparkspeds.com kevin windisch

    Hands down preventive healthcare is a cheap investment compared to end stage tertiary care, yet we as a society continue to undervalue it and under pay for it. Vaccines are a perfect example- two of the top 10 largest employers in my state carve all vaccines out of their insurance plans if the child is over 2 years of age.