<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Saying no to a re-tweet request, and whether Twitter as a legitimate news source</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/11/retweet-request-twitter-legitimate-news-source.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/11/retweet-request-twitter-legitimate-news-source.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Tweeter</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/11/retweet-request-twitter-legitimate-news-source.html#comment-118731</link> <dc:creator>Tweeter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:30:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=41137#comment-118731</guid> <description>Aren&#039;t these many reasons for RTing every way implied? Everyone knows RT&#039;s aren&#039;t &quot;endorsement&quot; per se.A RT is sufficient to point anyone interested to the direct account.   You aren&#039;t under any obligation to RT on request,  or barred from RT&#039;ing as a favor to a Tweeter you want a tweet relationship with.If someone is insisting you retweet them,  that has to be distinguished from someone who asks for a favor.  That&#039;s bad manners.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t these many reasons for RTing every way implied? Everyone knows RT&#8217;s aren&#8217;t &#8220;endorsement&#8221; per se.</p><p>A RT is sufficient to point anyone interested to the direct account.   You aren&#8217;t under any obligation to RT on request,  or barred from RT&#8217;ing as a favor to a Tweeter you want a tweet relationship with.</p><p>If someone is insisting you retweet them,  that has to be distinguished from someone who asks for a favor.  That&#8217;s bad manners.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alchemipedia</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/11/retweet-request-twitter-legitimate-news-source.html#comment-118697</link> <dc:creator>Alchemipedia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:08:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=41137#comment-118697</guid> <description>Interesting and thought provoking post.I re-tweet for many reasons, not just because I may be in agreement with a specific twitter i.e: agreement - endorsement - &#039;interesting&#039; - incredulity - funny - &#039;for information&#039; - wow - &#039;breaking news&#039; - correction etc.I suppose the intended reason for the re-tweet could be indicated by prefix or suffix ie RTbn = re-teet breaking news RTf = re-tweet funny RTfi = re-tweet for information etc ... Just a thought.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and thought provoking post.</p><p>I re-tweet for many reasons, not just because I may be in agreement with a specific twitter i.e:<br /> agreement &#8211; endorsement &#8211; &#8216;interesting&#8217; &#8211; incredulity &#8211; funny &#8211; &#8216;for information&#8217; &#8211; wow &#8211; &#8216;breaking news&#8217; &#8211; correction etc.</p><p>I suppose the intended reason for the re-tweet could be indicated by prefix or suffix ie<br /> RTbn = re-teet breaking news<br /> RTf = re-tweet funny<br /> RTfi = re-tweet for information<br /> etc &#8230;<br /> Just a thought.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 352/356 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 20:26:19 -->
