Originally published in HCPLive.com
by Jeff Brown, MD
I had the same reaction . . . shock at seeing an almost obscene claim about our profession in a national newspaper. But it got me thinking, which no doubt was its intended purpose. While we are thinking and feeling our way through this wide-ranging debate on health care, we might as well examine everything. And as we have painfully learned, no part of life is immune from money issues, especially medicine.
Corruption, for our purposes here, is the bending or abrogating of our integrity, putting forth what is “best” for our patient as a result of venal or other outside influences. We may not think about it much but we are assaulted on a daily basis in many ways, some obvious, some subtle.
The poster child for lobbying physicians is the drug rep. Before Congress began reining in Big Pharma’s largesse over the last 20 years, there was a time of thinly veiled bribes—trips, cash for “consulting,” speaking and research—and my office was once booked over a month in advance for catered lunches for the staff. “Any restaurant you want and anything on the menu,” we were told. We thought it was just a nice perk for the staff and kept them around the office.
And don’t forget the endless supply of company-name-stamped tchotchkes, of course, or the embarrassing feeding frenzy at national medical meetings where presumably ethical and well-paid docs and their wives rushed to fill bulging goody bags with “free” junk in the extensive exhibitor’s hall.
We should ruefully admit that these companies weren’t blindly spending billions on these programs and couldn’t document that these things worked. In spite of our righteous protestations, they did. Did you know that drug companies still pay a monthly fee to pharmacies to see a specific read-out on what and how much each doc prescribes? They know that we too are human and our prescribing habits change, admit it or not, when the companies pay personal attention to us.
Good riddance to the drug companies’ more flagrant gifts: it’s been a long time coming.
Now let’s revisit the biggest corrupter of all, the fee-for-service structure. With all the economic pressure of student loans, high overhead, family needs and on and on, it takes a steel will to stay on point. Not to yield in those extensive gray areas of decision-making and perform extra procedures, schedule extra visits, order tests through facilities in which we have an economic interest, or change our prescribing habits all require a major effort to keep ones eyes on the horizon. And worse, in addition to our personal rationalizations, our patients often demand that we do these things! So we acquiesce, knowing that we are often just buying time for problems that will get better anyway . . . and really, what’s the harm?
Ironically, the knock we’ve had against HMOs/managed care—that being paid for doing too little is a bad idea for our patients—also applies for fee-for-service which pays us too-often for doing too much. That’s why I have written in the past that putting docs on salary would mitigate the cost of health care considerably. Yes, there are other issues that arise with docs on salary, like maintaining activity and quality levels, but that discussion is for another day.
Corruption is also engendered by the insurance companies being inefficient and just plain difficult. It is axiomatic that when you are dealing with a dysfunctional system, the only way you can get your work done is to game the system. So you or your staff manipulate things like CPT, ICD-9s, and other forms without end. You say it’s only “fair” and that you are just trying to help your patient get what they need by doing whatever it takes. This is too often true and we’ve all done it. But it is not “clean” and diminishes us each time we do it. The ends certainly do not justify the means.
Even putting ethics aside, all of this costs time, which in our trade is money. Because time is all we have, besides our good names, we are corrupted and bent away from our primary mission. I’m reminded of the old saw that says, “We all know what we are, we’re just dickering about the price.”
But I’d like to think that our profession still aspires to set a standard for others to be better than that.
Jeff Brown is a family physician who blogs at Take As Needed.
Submit a guest post and be heard.
Related posts:
- Again: More health care is not better health care
- Patients do not want their doctors paid on salary
- Primary care is damn cheap, and can solve our health care woes
- Universal health care and the physician shortage
- Doctors and patients need to learn to live with health insurance companies
- My take: NPs, solving health care, generics vs brand name drugs
- Rising health care costs and the tax preference for employer-based health insurance
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe






{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }
You forgot patients. Always trying to corrupt us by catastrophizing symptoms so we over- treat, neglecting to inform us of their non-compliance so we prescribe more expensive second line treatment, demanding to mention another problem at the last minute to try to work two office visits into one copay and steal time from the next patient.
Everywhere we look are corrupting influences. We can’t practice pure medicine like this. We must run away and lock ourselves in our ivory towers, practicing medicine in theory only so there can be no hint if corruption. The world is just too corrupting for our genteal sensibilities.
/sarcasm
In order to purge healthcare of corruption, let’s turn it over to the US government! Brilliant!
/sarc
I’m sorry you’re so easily corrupted, Dr. Brown. Contrary to current popular thought, not all of us are so easy to sway with a free lunch or drug samples or a bag full of nick-knacks at a convention.
I did the salary thing (I believe you would call it being a “valued employee”). My problem was that the people I worked for (who were not doctors) were corrupt.
Apart from quitting – or letting a baby die – do you have any suggestions for that?
We Doctors must be the Holy Ones. Not like those filthy mechanics or accountants or most of the rest of the US economy that gets paid for providing an individual service. Unlike those people (who are irreversibly corrupted by the stench of being paid MONEY for SERVICES), we must rise above the moneychangers in the temple by embracing the US government and accepting the VA-level yearly salary that represents true freedom.
Now if you’ll excuse me it’s 3pm and I’ve put my 38 hours in this week so I don’t have to see patients any more.
As a VA doc, I think alex’s comment is hilarious and true.
Seriously, why don’t you list your telephone number so my patients have someone to call when we enlist into this salaried mecca.
Imagine that, after years of education and training, in the trenches patent care, now doctors are expected to not want or need to actually be paid accordingly, for their expertise and services rendered. Nay, they’re now expected to just be a cog in the machine, accepting the scrapes thrown their way, in grateful servitude.
I don’t completely agree with you that putting doctors on salaries would reduce health care expenses.
I work in an ER with a set hourly, so it’s not like I get paid for my RVUs. In essence, I’m on a salary and not fee-for-service. I still overorder tests, and the major driver is fear of litigation.
However, I do agree with your main points. I’ve worked in China and seen how the doctors there get paid kickbacks from drug companies for prescriptions, it’s disgusting and leads to a high rate of inappropriate prescriptions. While I think decoupling physicians from direct reimbursements for testing/therapies won’t decrease expenses, it will lead to better care for patients.
Alex,
Please post more often with your satirical “Dave Barry” style and content. Funny!