<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: How to choose the right electronic health record (EHR) consultant</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/11/choose-electronic-health-record-ehr-consultant.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/11/choose-electronic-health-record-ehr-consultant.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Jules Enatsky</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/11/choose-electronic-health-record-ehr-consultant.html#comment-120634</link> <dc:creator>Jules Enatsky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:49:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=41237#comment-120634</guid> <description>As a healtcare consultant who specializes in educating providers on E&amp;M documentation and compliance and who is frequently  asked about EHR software, I feel the most important factor is software that is physician friendly that one that will not cost the provider an arm and a leg to update or make changes to preferences. Hospital C-level&#039;s who never involve the largest user population usually fail and wind up with provider revolt. If you are not comfortable in using a program, don&#039;t buy it. Also, look at AAFP website where some excellent tools are available for free to evaluate EHR software firms and a program that allows you to rate vendors, see cost benefit (ROI), expected pitfalls based on staff size, etc.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a healtcare consultant who specializes in educating providers on E&amp;M documentation and compliance and who is frequently  asked about EHR software, I feel the most important factor is software that is physician friendly that one that will not cost the provider an arm and a leg to update or make changes to preferences. Hospital C-level&#8217;s who never involve the largest user population usually fail and wind up with provider revolt. If you are not comfortable in using a program, don&#8217;t buy it. Also, look at AAFP website where some excellent tools are available for free to evaluate EHR software firms and a program that allows you to rate vendors, see cost benefit (ROI), expected pitfalls based on staff size, etc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tex Bryant</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/11/choose-electronic-health-record-ehr-consultant.html#comment-119390</link> <dc:creator>Tex Bryant</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:47:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=41237#comment-119390</guid> <description>Besides worrying about hardware and software and the attendant costs, another concern is making best use of the EHR.  As I have pointed out in a recent white paper on my website, a serious problem is the frustration that a staff can develop in trying to make the best use of an EHR.  From my perspective, the best approach is to implement the most important features as determined by a team at the health care site, so that each of the staff using the EHR is comfortable and open about communicating any problems.  In fact, a site may not use all of the features in the EHR they purchase.  After all, how many of us use all the features in Microsoft Word or Excel.As I said, I have a guide on what I believe to be the best approach to implementing an EHR.  The guide is free pdf file.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides worrying about hardware and software and the attendant costs, another concern is making best use of the EHR.  As I have pointed out in a recent white paper on my website, a serious problem is the frustration that a staff can develop in trying to make the best use of an EHR.  From my perspective, the best approach is to implement the most important features as determined by a team at the health care site, so that each of the staff using the EHR is comfortable and open about communicating any problems.  In fact, a site may not use all of the features in the EHR they purchase.  After all, how many of us use all the features in Microsoft Word or Excel.</p><p>As I said, I have a guide on what I believe to be the best approach to implementing an EHR.  The guide is free pdf file.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 352/356 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 20:26:32 -->
