<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to reduce the risk of medical errors from patient hand-offs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/09/reduce-risk-medical-errors-patient-handoffs.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/09/reduce-risk-medical-errors-patient-handoffs.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:47:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/09/reduce-risk-medical-errors-patient-handoffs.html/comment-page-1#comment-112854</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=40270#comment-112854</guid>
		<description>Having worked as an Operating Room nurse both prior and after the initiation of systematic, routine and standardized hand off tools, I can most definitely say that these kinds of tools are an asset in patient care.  I was a skeptic when these tools were first instituted, but have since learned how valuable they can truly be.  They do take time to adjust to, but all the effort is definitely worth it in the end result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having worked as an Operating Room nurse both prior and after the initiation of systematic, routine and standardized hand off tools, I can most definitely say that these kinds of tools are an asset in patient care.  I was a skeptic when these tools were first instituted, but have since learned how valuable they can truly be.  They do take time to adjust to, but all the effort is definitely worth it in the end result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M. Grohol, PsyD</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/09/reduce-risk-medical-errors-patient-handoffs.html/comment-page-1#comment-112789</link>
		<dc:creator>John M. Grohol, PsyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=40270#comment-112789</guid>
		<description>Interesting to note that this recent study was not mentioned on this blog regarding the problems associated with long work hours by residents:

http://www.medpagetoday.com/HospitalBasedMedicine/RiskManagement/16085

Residents who work longer hours are at risk for making more major medical mistakes. Sorry, but I&#039;d rather be handed off in a systematic and reliable manner to a &quot;fresh&quot; doctor, than to have someone who&#039;s had 3 hours of sleep in the past 36 hours making decisions about my life and health.

Seriously, if we can &quot;pass off&quot; systematically and reliably in other high-risk professions -- and have been doing so for years -- the medical profession can also learn this new skill. It is new, and it is a skill, so it will take time to adjust. Make the handoffs more reliable and systematic, and boom! -- you have better health care for all -- patients (and doctors!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to note that this recent study was not mentioned on this blog regarding the problems associated with long work hours by residents:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/HospitalBasedMedicine/RiskManagement/16085" rel="nofollow">http://www.medpagetoday.com/HospitalBasedMedicine/RiskManagement/16085</a></p>
<p>Residents who work longer hours are at risk for making more major medical mistakes. Sorry, but I&#8217;d rather be handed off in a systematic and reliable manner to a &#8220;fresh&#8221; doctor, than to have someone who&#8217;s had 3 hours of sleep in the past 36 hours making decisions about my life and health.</p>
<p>Seriously, if we can &#8220;pass off&#8221; systematically and reliably in other high-risk professions &#8212; and have been doing so for years &#8212; the medical profession can also learn this new skill. It is new, and it is a skill, so it will take time to adjust. Make the handoffs more reliable and systematic, and boom! &#8212; you have better health care for all &#8212; patients (and doctors!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/09/reduce-risk-medical-errors-patient-handoffs.html/comment-page-1#comment-112738</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=40270#comment-112738</guid>
		<description>Ever try to get something important done in the ICU at shift change?  Doesn&#039;t happen.  

When shift change becomes so important that nurses, the pharmacy and consultants aren&#039;t allowed to page during or otherwise disturb the process, we&#039;ll master hand off.

It will never happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever try to get something important done in the ICU at shift change?  Doesn&#8217;t happen.  </p>
<p>When shift change becomes so important that nurses, the pharmacy and consultants aren&#8217;t allowed to page during or otherwise disturb the process, we&#8217;ll master hand off.</p>
<p>It will never happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tex Bryant</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/09/reduce-risk-medical-errors-patient-handoffs.html/comment-page-1#comment-112721</link>
		<dc:creator>Tex Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=40270#comment-112721</guid>
		<description>Here is a link to an article on the wsj.com site which describes hospitals using handoff based upon nuclear submarine handoff processes.  It is very informative:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115145533775992541-search.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a link to an article on the wsj.com site which describes hospitals using handoff based upon nuclear submarine handoff processes.  It is very informative:<br />
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115145533775992541-search.html." rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115145533775992541-search.html.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bader</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/09/reduce-risk-medical-errors-patient-handoffs.html/comment-page-1#comment-112713</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=40270#comment-112713</guid>
		<description>Patient handoffs have become a hot topic in medicine. For example, the NY Times blog post noted by KevinMD drew several dozen comments, many from physicians and nurses. 

The handoff&#039;s role in patient safety is coming under increasing scrutiny not just because reduced resident hours mean many more are occurring than in the past but because mishandled handoffs play such a large role in hospital sentinel events. The Joint Commission, which has made handoff quality a formal part of its accreditation reviews, conducted a study in 2006  that showed 67% of the sentinel events it identified that year arose from mishandled physician communication. The 800 or so such events it tracked that year were double the number in 2002.

The traditional standard for handoff documentation has been slips of paper, index cards or homemade document or spreadsheet templates, which many hospitals are seeking to upgrade in the wake of the Joint Commission&#039;s new handoff requirement and guidelines published by specialty associations such as the Society for Hospital Medicine (developed, among others, by Dr. Arora quoted above).

A sure sign of the the handoff&#039;s rising prominence is that healthcare technology companies have sensed an opportunity and there are now a number of specialized patient handoff applications available, as well as emerging efforts by the large EMR companies to address the handoff on their platforms. The shifting landscape is promoting an animated debate among technologists about how best to recreate the handoff in their software while addressing an imperative to improve communication. 

In this atmosphere, there&#039;s a sense everything is on the table with regard to improving the handoff and I take the increasing reference to nurses&#039; reports as a model for what works to be part of that. Nurses, for their part, have long been vocal about patient safety and their role in promoting it.  That the nurse&#039;s report - and the culture that supports it - are increasingly being held up as a possible model for residents and attendings to emulate is intriguing and shows how much ferment there is over handoffs right now.

(Full disclosure: my company, Lime Medical, makes a mobile patient handoff application).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patient handoffs have become a hot topic in medicine. For example, the NY Times blog post noted by KevinMD drew several dozen comments, many from physicians and nurses. </p>
<p>The handoff&#8217;s role in patient safety is coming under increasing scrutiny not just because reduced resident hours mean many more are occurring than in the past but because mishandled handoffs play such a large role in hospital sentinel events. The Joint Commission, which has made handoff quality a formal part of its accreditation reviews, conducted a study in 2006  that showed 67% of the sentinel events it identified that year arose from mishandled physician communication. The 800 or so such events it tracked that year were double the number in 2002.</p>
<p>The traditional standard for handoff documentation has been slips of paper, index cards or homemade document or spreadsheet templates, which many hospitals are seeking to upgrade in the wake of the Joint Commission&#8217;s new handoff requirement and guidelines published by specialty associations such as the Society for Hospital Medicine (developed, among others, by Dr. Arora quoted above).</p>
<p>A sure sign of the the handoff&#8217;s rising prominence is that healthcare technology companies have sensed an opportunity and there are now a number of specialized patient handoff applications available, as well as emerging efforts by the large EMR companies to address the handoff on their platforms. The shifting landscape is promoting an animated debate among technologists about how best to recreate the handoff in their software while addressing an imperative to improve communication. </p>
<p>In this atmosphere, there&#8217;s a sense everything is on the table with regard to improving the handoff and I take the increasing reference to nurses&#8217; reports as a model for what works to be part of that. Nurses, for their part, have long been vocal about patient safety and their role in promoting it.  That the nurse&#8217;s report &#8211; and the culture that supports it &#8211; are increasingly being held up as a possible model for residents and attendings to emulate is intriguing and shows how much ferment there is over handoffs right now.</p>
<p>(Full disclosure: my company, Lime Medical, makes a mobile patient handoff application).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kirsch, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/09/reduce-risk-medical-errors-patient-handoffs.html/comment-page-1#comment-112701</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kirsch, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/?p=40270#comment-112701</guid>
		<description>We all know that the handoffs from a medical resident to another resident are often not quite seamless.  This issue is just as relevant to practicing physicians.  We &#039;hand off&#039; patients at night and on weekends to colleagues.  Often, we provide a covering physician with a list of patients with a few short annotations about each patient.  For example,

ICU Bed 12: Patient X with abd abscess and renal failure
Bed 201: Patient Y with bilateral pneumonia
Stepdown Bed 10: Patient Z with PE and rectal bleeding

Perhaps, once medical residents tighten up the process, they can give the rest of us some pointers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know that the handoffs from a medical resident to another resident are often not quite seamless.  This issue is just as relevant to practicing physicians.  We &#8216;hand off&#8217; patients at night and on weekends to colleagues.  Often, we provide a covering physician with a list of patients with a few short annotations about each patient.  For example,</p>
<p>ICU Bed 12: Patient X with abd abscess and renal failure<br />
Bed 201: Patient Y with bilateral pneumonia<br />
Stepdown Bed 10: Patient Z with PE and rectal bleeding</p>
<p>Perhaps, once medical residents tighten up the process, they can give the rest of us some pointers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/15 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2010-03-20 18:40:37 -->