Inconvenient truths about our health care system

1. Most physicians do not set their own fees. Medicare, Medicaid, and private health plans set these fees, which often have little to do with the costs of doing business.

2. Congress each year sets Medicare fees through a formula called SGR (Sustainable Growth Rate), which this year calls for a 20% reduction in overall physician fees.

3. If SGR were to go through as to proposed, surveys indicate at many at 30% of physicians will not accept new Medicare patients because new Medicare fees will not cover expenses.

4. The next political crisis will be limited access to doctors; this is already occurring in Boston, where waiting times to see doctors are 2 to 3 times the national average for comparable cities.

5. Medicare on average pays 80% of what it costs to provide care: hospitals and doctors make up the difference by negotiating higher payments from the much maligned private plans.

6. An estimated 10% of health costs are due to the practice of “defensive medicine,” whereby doctors order extra tests and procedures in anticipation of defending themselves again future malpractice lawsuits.

7. Passing federal laws permitting patients to enroll in plans and “portability” of plans across state lines would make a public option unnecessary and would render private plans “competitive.”

8. Ending “community ratings,” which force the young to pay the same premiums as older individuals, and reducing “standard benefit plans, “ which often include unnecessary benefits, would reduce premiums for the young and decrease the number of uninsured.

9. The primary care shortage is real and growing because medical students are smart and are not choosing to work twice as long as specialists at 1/2 the pay; doubling Medicare pay for primary office visits would be a good start for relieving the crisis.

10. The surest way to reduce costs is having patients spend more of their own money and making them more responsible for their health, which is the premise of lower-premium health savings accounts and high deductible plans.

Richard Reece is the author of Obama, Doctors, and Health Reform and blogs at medinnovationblog.

Submit a guest post and be heard.

email

  • Evinx

    Nice to see another MD who gets it! And for those who clamor for the “public option” bcs of “profits” – consider that most people get their insurance from employers who self-insure and hire companies to manage their plans. That accounts for slightly more than half of insured employees. Then factor that in most states (29 of 43 for which there is data), a non-profit (Blue Cross/Blue Shield) is the insurance company with by far the largest market share. I guess those who hate the “greedy insurance companies” are just confused and really hate the greedy non-profits. This goes to show you how non-sensical the public option is. Public option is merely code for highway to single payor.

  • Convenient Truths

    1. If payments for Medicare and private insurance companies are so poor, why do doctors accept them for payment. It seems that opening a cash only practice solves this problem for the doctor.

    2. No worries about Medicare if you follow #1.

    3. Hmmm…I wonder what the government would do if there are no doctors to pay? I guess that saves the tax payers some money.

    4. Isn’t this a boon for doctors? Supply and demand.

    5. You forgot to say that those without insurance pay a lot more that those with insurance. Cash only fixes this, too.

    6. Tort reform is good. I just want a doctor that can say sorry when things go wrong. Everyone makes mistakes. Maybe doctors would be inclined to do the right thing when they make a mistake if they didn’t have to fear getting sued.

    7. I only get one choice from my employer. Opening the market across state lines is going to give my employer more choices, not me. Eliminating employer based insurance would increase competitivenss.

    8. Customizing plans for age seems like a good idea. Perahps they should be customized for gender, also. Since men avoid doctors, it must be the women who over utilize medical care.

    9. Supply and demand. If we want capitalism for our health care system…

    10. If you are an MD and you believe patients should pay for their own health care, why are you accepting insurance? Why not go cash only? I skip preventive care altogether-not really worth the money. I avoid the doctor whenever possible-alternative providers are great for those small problems and since they are cash only, they are much cheaper.

  • http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki Bill Seitz

    Or maybe Medicare should cut rates to specialists by 50%. (Semi-kidding)

  • Convenient Truths

    “Or maybe Medicare should cut rates to specialists by 50%. (Semi-kidding)”

    I have a specialist I see once a year for an ongoing medical issue. He spends about 30 minutes with me for $180. A trip to the family practice clinic costs $300 for a 10 minute visit with the NP. A visit to the naturpath only costs $75. Fifteen minutes with my PT is only $37.

    Cash only is the way to go.

  • alex

    “The primary care shortage is real and growing because medical students are smart and are not choosing to work twice as long as specialists at 1/2 the pay”

    Reading this one made me ignore anything I had read on the previous items. If you think that the average specialist works a shorter work week than the average PCP (much less TWICE as short), you are simply incorrect. There is plenty of data on average hours worked by field and PCPs work fewer hours than IM specialists and much less than surgeons. Moreover, I can’t even imagine how anyone with any degree of experience would think this is the case. It’s basically a big red flag for “no idea what they’re talking about”.

    There’s a good argument that procedures (NOT surgeries, procedures) are overpaid. This is not it.

  • Evinx

    “I have a specialist I see once a year for an ongoing medical issue. He spends about 30 minutes with me for $180. A trip to the family practice clinic costs $300 for a 10 minute visit with the NP. A visit to the naturpath only costs $75. Fifteen minutes with my PT is only $37.”

    Convenient Truths – you are a great example of how people, if given the power of the dollars (no 3rd party payment) will make rational choices and not overuse the medical system. With the existing system, people perceive everything is free – or built in to the premiums + therefore, might as well get their monies worth. And this attitude permeates not only patients but doctors + medical staff as well (you might as well get that test as insurance is paying for it anyway).

    And the more we delegate to Washington, the more we encourage special interest groups. After all, why should they spend money trying to influence patients when they have no power of the pocketbook. Better to spend money on lobbying bcs that is where there can be a return for the money. We can solve so much if we control more of the bucks.

  • Keith Ray

    All healthcare providers are facing the same type problems with government and insurance companies. There is no solution, just different options. First, healthcare should be left to the providers and not the government or insurance companies. Second, people should pay more out of their pockets. Instead of increased government involvement, we need less.

  • http://www.futurewaredc.com Chuck Brooks

    Item 10 (patient responsibility) worked pretty well before the politicos got compassion using other peoples’ money. Can’t go back as there are now too many expecting a free ride, and most of them vote.
    Chuck Brooks
    FutureWare SCG

  • Convenient Truths

    “We can solve so much if we control more of the bucks.”

    Doctors have the ability to control the bucks. I don’t get what this issue is with money. If you don’t feel you are well compensated with Medicare and private insurance, then don’t accept payment. Cash only. Problem solved. No government bill to bail you out.

  • CB

    5. Medicare on average pays 80% of what it costs to provide care: hospitals and doctors make up the difference by negotiating higher payments from the much maligned private plans.

    Hmm, how to unwind the circularity in that statement? Maybe this:
    Medicare payments were for decades set to a model of ratcheting, elastic demand, causing “costs”–including physician compensation–to balloon up to meet that demand. This has resulted in costs and payments, including median net physician compensation, moving up to over twice that of other developed countries, fundamentally threatening national competitiveness. In the last 15 years, a degree of control over physician reimbursements has slightly reduced that compensation gulf, though overall costs/payments have continued rising, to the point of significantly affecting US economic competitiveness. We are currently involved in Act I of the recurring annual Kabuki theater [per Uwe Reinhardt] in which simple accounting reveals that an intial 20% cut in physician compensation would be required to keep Medicare solvent. In Act II, Congress will actually increase compensation, bringing further forward the projected date of Medicare’s financial demise.
    In principle, we could instantly cut all medical payments by 50%, across the board. The economic disruption would be huge, and many people would die. But the system would settle out with “costs” per patient at about 50% of what they are now (partly due to a reduction in procedures, tests, etc.). Overall medical outcomes would settle out to about what we have now.
    There is no objective economic reality to these costs, which have merely risen to consume the money available. They are an artifact of an uncontrolled dumping of money into the health care sector by the US government. We just haven’t found an elegant way of tapering off that dumping process.

  • Evinx

    Convenient Truths
    This sentence “We can solve so much if we control more of the bucks” was referring to patients (the public), not MDs.

  • dearlizzie

    Dr. Reece has not thought through some of his statements nor examined the facts in all cases. A recent study looking at tests ordered by doctors before and after they purchased scans or other machinery shows that far more tests are ordered when a doctor or practice own the testing machines. The Mayo Clinic put all its docs on salary and once they were not chasing fees for services, docs ordered far fewer tests according to the Clinic. Doctors may be entirely unconscious of this but it seems to be a reality.The actual stats on medical malpractice suites show torts are not a driver of health care costs. Tort reform is a red herring asserts Connecticut law professor and insurance expert Tom Baker. Most suits are meritorious and all costs, from litigation expenses to pay outs & alleged premium increases only total less than 1% of all health care costs.

  • http://www.consentcare.com Martin Young

    Cash only is fine in principle, but many of my patients simply don’t have the cash on hand. Credit is not a sensible option. In many ways I am forced to practice Robin Hood medicine, charging those who can afford to pay more to subsidise those who can’t! And how do you make that distinction? The patient’s car, watch, cellphone or residential address? Looks alone are very misleading.

  • http://www.consentcare.com Martin Young

    And it goes completely against the grain for a good doctor to refuse care based on inability to pay.

  • Nuclear Fire

    I really enjoy seeing patients with limited funds (well, everyone has limited funds but those paying cash (read working poor, not rich) or using HSAs are much more cognizant of that fact) because I actually get to have an intelligent conversation about possible diagnoses, the rarity and unlikelihood of certain diagnosis and different options. Then you get involved patients who may says things like:
    1. You know, I know it’s highly unlikely and that we don’t need to diagnose it early but I’m just not going to be able to sleep worrying about if I have it or not so I’m willing to pay for an MRI.
    or
    2. Well, that’s a lot of money. If it’s super rare, then I’d rather just wait and see if it doesn’t go away and call you if things change because at least I know I don’t have something bad I have to fix now.

    In contrast, my conversations with those covered by our states charity plan:
    3. I want EVERYTHING done. (Uh, an MRI isn’t indicated.) But I want EVERYTHING DONE. (I already know the diagnosis and told you what it is, more testing isn’t indicated.) You’re a terrible doctor because you don’t order all the tests I’ve read about on the internet (Seriously was told that when their ANA was negative but they wanted the patterns of the ANA because they read about them on the internet.)

    God bless informed, rational, involved patients.

  • Convenient Truth

    “referring to patients (the public), not MDs.”

    Why does the patient have all the responsiblilty to make sure the doctor get paid what he wants? I don’t understand why this is patient issue only. Insurance company/government pricing makes it difficult for patients to make sound financial decisions.

  • Rural PCP

    I want to know where a primary care NP gets $300 for an office visit. I get $75 if I am lucky. Sign me up. The way the current regulations are written though I cannot offer to see a patient for a reduced amount for cash pay if they don’t have insurance and desire to pay as I would violate medicaire/medicaide regulations. The primary care physician cannot legally set any of their costs. I like the Robin Hood concept discussed above. True so true unfortunately. Also unfortunately as primary care we are forced to see more patients in less time to keep up with the overhead created by more regulations as we have had to hire roughly 30% of our work force in our rural hospital and clinic to just deal with paperwork and staying compliant with regulations. More patients in less time = increased quantity of care = decreased quality of care in my opinion.

  • Convenient Truths

    I live in a suburb of a large metropolitan city. The clinic I spoke about is part of a big medical center which probably has good negotiating power when it comes to contracts with insurance companies. I was floored when I saw how much they charged for a visit that was a waste of time-I had to see a doctor anyway. Of course, the specialist charged me a lot less.

    Perhaps practicing in a rural setting is affecting you bottom line.

  • pp

    Convenient Truths

    I practice in the suburbs of New York city and 50% of the insurances pay $40 or less. United Healthcare just handed me new rates saying they will be paying me $35 for a 99213.

    The pay rates have nothing to do with being rural or in a metroplitan area, it has to do with clout. As a singe physician I have none.

  • NN

    If both doctors & patients are unhappy about health care system, then, who is actually happy? Insurance companies? Govt?

Trending