by Martin Young, MD
As an outside observer of the American health reform debate, I cannot help but notice the disparity of views, the fractured arguments, the protectionism and desperation. My country is in a similar struggle for health care reform, with the main difference being America is a rich nation, and we are poor by comparison. In both debates, however, I have looked for the humanitarian argument, and in many cases found it lacking. Much of what appears to be missing can be summed up in the African phrase “Ubuntu.”
I am a ‘white’ African and must defer to someone with the right credentials to explain what ‘Ubuntu’ really is. There is no one better than Archbishop Desmond Tutu, a struggle icon in South Africa’s past, and a bold and courageous critic of our current progress as a new democracy.
Archbishop Desmond Tutu (1999) from Wikipedia:
“A person with Ubuntu is open and available to others, affirming of others, does not feel threatened that others are able and good, for he or she has a proper self-assurance that comes from knowing that he or she belongs in a greater whole and is diminished when others are humiliated or diminished, when others are tortured or oppressed.
Archbishop Desmond Tutu further explained Ubuntu as follows (2008):
One of the sayings in our country is Ubuntu – the essence of being human. Ubuntu speaks particularly about the fact that you can’t exist as a human being in isolation. It speaks about our interconnectedness. You can’t be human all by yourself, and when you have this quality – Ubuntu – you are known for your generosity.
We think of ourselves far too frequently as just individuals, separated from one another, whereas you are connected and what you do affects the whole world. When you do well, it spreads out; it is for the whole of humanity.”
Imagine a health reform debate where this quality becomes a central issue! How rational can an argument against the general principles of ‘ubuntu’ be? Will all issues not become more transparent?
My belief is that health care reform should be seen as a global issue as important as global warming. Ubuntu tells us we cannot operate in isolation. The consequences of American health reform will reverberate through the world. To ignore this connectedness will have similar negative ramifications as ignoring the threat of global climate change. Perhaps we need a catch phrase similar to ‘global warming’ that becomes a rallying call for change – ‘ubuntu health’ perhaps?
Human beings originated in Africa. Geneticists tell us we share a common great…great grandfather, that we are all, irrespective of color, race or creed, cousins. Africa is our ancestral home. Ubuntu is an African consciousness pulling us all into one global family, where we can care about each other emphatically.
There is no place in an honest quest for healthcare reform for protectionism and selfish self-interest – the principles of ubuntu are critical. Follow them, and success is almost guaranteed, ignore them and fail.
Barack Obama is as much African as he is American. We can be sure that he understands exactly what ‘ubuntu’ means. And while America debates, the world watches and waits.
Martin Young, an otolaryngologist in South Africa, is founder of ConsentCare.
Submit a guest post and be heard.
Related posts:
- What the United States health care system can learn from Mexico
- Citizens, not lobbyists, must reform health care in the United States
- Countries with worse health care systems than the United States
- A major obstacle impeding universal coverage in the United States
- Saving what’s good about the United States’ health care system
- What doctors can learn from patients in the health care reform debate
- When it comes to health care reform, winners and no losers?
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe








{ 6 comments }
Hutus and tutsis come to mind. One man, one vote…..once. I’ve done medical volunteer work in Africa, saw plenty of tribalism and cruelty.
“Ubuntu”, huh? I saw it lacking many a time there.
Not certain if you comprehend what the healthcare debate is about. To a large group of people (imo, the majority based on polling data), the debate is about personal freedom. We have a safety net to assist the poor (Medicaid) but for the rest of us, we want to maintain our personal freedom – and not have govt mandates and control. At present, we have a hybrid system – and now the tug of war is being fought – more govt control and authority – vs keep the govt out of healthcare.
Over 200 years ago, we had a Supreme Court Justice state that the freedom to move one’s fist should only be limited by the proximity of another person’s chin.
Having govt tell us and compel us what is or is not in our interest does not sound like Ubuntu to me.
Your country can embrace its unique culture. American’s embrace personal responsibility and freedom. Apples and oranges. The converse is just as true. We are all of the same blood and ancestry. Why aren’t they embracing personal choice and freedom?
“A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away.” -Barry Goldwater
“The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out
of other people’s money.” -Margaret Thatcher
You should have first asked someone with the “right credentials” to explain to you what being an American means in the first place. This isn’t Africa.
Dr Young, thank you for expressing a component of the debate that has not received sufficient attention. The majority of Americans do subscribe to this concept, that we as members of this wealthy nation have a responsibility to one another to try to provide people with the means to stay healthy. It’s not about being American or African, it’s about being human.
The first few people who left comments are members of a very vocal minority. I hope that you also experience the opinions of the millions of Americans who are banding together to ensure that they no longer need to watch their children, parents, friends, and neighbors struggle due to lack of access to health care, and the tens of thousands of doctors who feel the same way.
All views are understandable and accepted, but the first four miss my point, and that is that we have a global problem requiring a global solution, and self interest (or commercialism) is not going to help anything. I am not pro governmental control whatsoever. I am however against commercial interests that strip the flesh off quality medical care and leave patients suffering! That is just inhumane! And that appears to be what the reformers want to prevent. Whether they will succeed or not is unknown. What does appear very clear is that if things do not change, and comprehensibly, none of us will have decent affordable healthcare in the near future no matter where we live!
Comments on this entry are closed.