Journalism professor Gary Schwitzer is the foremost health media watchdog, with his organization rigorously monitoring the health content of major media.
During the past year, he notes a disturbing trend. According to his analysis, the health segments on network television morning shows, “unquestioningly promote new drugs and new technologies, feed the ‘worried well’ by raising unrealistic expectations of unproven technologies that may produce more harm than good, fail to ask tough questions, [and] make any discussion of health care reform that much more difficult.”
Professor Schwitzer’s group over at Health News Review rates segments on a 5 star scale, and when looking at almost 20 sample morning show segments this year, none rated higher than 2 stars on a standardized review system.
Calling it a “dangerous pattern,” Professor Schwitzer notes that these popular morning news segments, “do more harm than good to public understanding of health care.”
Indeed.
Related posts:
- Local television news may be using pre-packaged health stories
- How mainstream news butchers health policy
- Lab results: "No news is good news" is the worst advice
- The latest threat to public health
- Is Physicians for a National Health Program the biggest threat to Obama’s health reform plan?
- The media influence on patients and medical stories
- Sweeps month: Local news stations are dialing up the health scare stories
{ 2 comments }
Just like doctors are restricted from taking gifts from pharmaceuticals, why can’t politicians be barred from taking gifts from lobbyists. Then Healthcare reform can proceed more smoothly. And these lobbyist will not be able to run such degraded campaigns.
Agreed, Bookstore. Let’s start with the Trial Lawyers.
Comments on this entry are closed.