Confused about health care reform?
Dan Roam, of Back of the Napkin fame, explains what’s going on, in his signature visual style. Good stuff.
Related posts:
- Why you should root against US health care reform
- Tom Daschle withdraws, and how that will impact health care reform
- Discussing health care reform at the National Press Club, Friday, July 17th at 9am
- AMA: Curbing the rise in health care costs is key to health-system reform
- The Obama health care summit, and did the President offer any clues to the upcoming health reform effort?
- Why Americans fear radical health care reform
- Talking health care reform and social media in medicine
KevinMD.com on Facebook
{ 8 comments }
Excellent overview of the problem. Thanks for posting. I hope is not too late for people to realize that HR676 is the only solution to deal with the present health insurance mess. When Medicare was enacted it took one year to sign up 90% of seniors. There was no disruption and its history has been one of relative success. Its excesses and shortcomings have needed attention along the way, but so far have not presented any reason to throw out the baby with the dishwater.
The only mistake was saying a government run system is socialist as that implies all the doctors are paid by the government and the hospitals owned by the government. Otherwise very nice.
Great presentation!
Simplistic and not entirely accurate. For example, health care is hardly a free-market with government mandates, bans on interstate competition, etc, all of which increase costs. Also as a provider, I hardly prescribe novel treatments “to keep the money flowing in.” Sounds like Obama saying doctors perform unnecessary procedures (tonsillectomies, palliative hip replacements, amputations) just to make money. Furthermore, this cartoon doesn’t address the potential role of the patient being incentivized to take more responsibility in his/her own health choices. And to say the GOP doesn’t want change, and then identify Sen Coburn’s bill, is inconsistent, not to mention untrue given many different amendments offered by republicans that have been voted down. I could go on and on about the mischaracterizations of the left-leaning proposals too, but others have addressed that. It’s one thing to simplify the debate…However, oversimplification can lead to misinformation.
@Dr. Green … CMS via NGS took months last year to pay claims, forcing at least one primary in our area to take out a second mortgage to make payroll, pay malpractice, etc. Also, Medicare is about to go belly-up. So yes, I’d agree, Medicare has its problems.
It seems like these guys are providing an opinion that shows Doctors only care about money (Prescribe new and expensive medications to keep money flowing in).
Doc99: Without details it is hard to evaluate your colleague’s unfortunate problems. Is this a general sense that Medicare is denying doctors a decent living? These problems seem very colloquial and specific to certain areas of the country but do require fixing, if true. It is not a problem in my state. However it pales in the face of the loss generated by private insurers. Why is that side of the ledger ignored. Yes they give you higher fees but lower volume per patient. They also tag on the expense when a patient can’t afford their copay or don’t pay you at the visit. This keeps any physician’s billing department larger than it should be.
Also those of you who think defensive medicine intervention by passing tort reform will help will be in for a rude awakening. The tort process costs represent about 1/2 to 1% of the health care bill. Well then, what about the extra testing needed to stave off being sued. Also an illusion. Most of this testing is done at hospitals that sit with fixed costs. So if they do 1000 tests or 2000 tests they have the capacity to handle it. To do basic care their personnel payroll remains about the same as when productivity is increased. If this revenue from testing was removed there would be a search to make up the shortfall since they would fall behind in paying for working staff. It is clear once a service is in place in a hospital there is an expandable range to finance it. Hospitals have made up their budgets to incorporate this expectation for business. They do not budget on what ifs, but from their past year. Recently such lack of income to our local hospital occurred because they had over-extended themselves on capital outlays. Their solution was to cut benefits(days off, pension plan) and cut back slightly on working hours. It was not good for morale and a terrible message to send to hard working people.
“Simplistic”…. It’s called “Back of the Napkin,” isn’t it?
The general public’s being overwhelmed with details, many of them intended to misdirect and kill the reform effort. A very basic discussion like this should be helpful to many.
-g
Comments on this entry are closed.