Retail clinics are not for patients with chronic disease

June 18, 2009

A patient recounts a dubious recent experience at a retail clinic.

Blogging over at Ill and Uninsured in Illinois (via Duncan Cross’ new patient-focused blog carnival), the patient correctly surmises that, “they’re a stop-gap, not a replacement for a primary-care physician,” and, “if you rely on on such clinics for your medical care, it’s very possible that underlying problems will go on unrecognized.”

Worse, studies have shown that many of these clinics are in affluent areas flushed with the well-insured. Those that need these services the most, namely, people without insurance or on Medicaid, find themselves without access to timely care that retail clinics can offer.

Because of the financial disincentives for a pharmacy to open up clinics in such areas, it’s suggested that “it makes more sense to set up nonprofit or government-run clinics and offer incentives to doctors to work there.”

The problem is, will these incentives be big enough to get clinicians to bite?



Related posts:

  1. Should primary care doctors embrace retail clinics?
  2. Retail clinics and disruptive innovation
  3. The retail clinic era is over, and why pharmacy-based clinics are doomed to fail
  4. Are retail clinics living up to expectations?
  5. The AMA takes on retail clinics
  6. Physician-staffed retail clinics
  7. Retail clinics and cherry-picking


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 1 trackback }

Web Media Daily – Thurs. June 18, 2009 | Reinventing Yourself...
June 18, 2009 at 8:52 pm

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: How Twitter can strengthen the doctor-patient relationship

Next post: Can Twitter be used to analyze your psychological profile?

Site Meter