My latest USA Today op-ed was published this morning.
I talk about controversies surrounding prostate and breast cancer screening, and how common sense doesn’t always apply when it comes to early cancer detection.
Here’s the bottom line: “Persuasive arguments can be made for and against screening, and the decision is a highly personal one. But patients must be better informed of the potential consequences either choice can bring.”
Enjoy the piece.
Related posts:
- Op-ed: Not all screening tests lead to early, better treatment
- Which cancer screening tests are really necessary?
- How screening for prostate cancer can be a gamble, and why either screening or not has consequences
- False positive cancer screening tests doesn’t resonate in Congress
- 15 cancer screening posts you may have missed
- Not all doctors discuss the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening to patients
- Will patients accept the limitations of prostate cancer screening?
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe







{ 1 comment }
Congrats! Great to have you on the USA Today.
Comments on this entry are closed.