<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Should Darvon be withdrawn? The implications of banning propoxyphene</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/02/should-darvon-be-withdrawn-implications.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/02/should-darvon-be-withdrawn-implications.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: FDA Gives Only Strong Warning on Use of Two Potent Narcotics, Stirring Debate &#124; DOCTOR PUNDIT</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/02/should-darvon-be-withdrawn-implications.html#comment-106492</link> <dc:creator>FDA Gives Only Strong Warning on Use of Two Potent Narcotics, Stirring Debate &#124; DOCTOR PUNDIT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:57:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2009/02/should-darvon-be-withdrawn-the-implications-of-banning-propoxyphene.html#comment-106492</guid> <description>[...] MD has some great reportage on this issue. Essentially, the FDA&#8217;s new maxim of transparency and policy change for the [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MD has some great reportage on this issue. Essentially, the FDA&#8217;s new maxim of transparency and policy change for the [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/02/should-darvon-be-withdrawn-implications.html#comment-89645</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2009/02/should-darvon-be-withdrawn-the-implications-of-banning-propoxyphene.html#comment-89645</guid> <description>short acting narcotics are not appropriate, nor are they &quot;required&quot; for chronic pain management.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>short acting narcotics are not appropriate, nor are they &#8220;required&#8221; for chronic pain management.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: maribella-ella</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/02/should-darvon-be-withdrawn-implications.html#comment-89641</link> <dc:creator>maribella-ella</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2009/02/should-darvon-be-withdrawn-the-implications-of-banning-propoxyphene.html#comment-89641</guid> <description>It&#039;s not really an equal comparison between Tylenol and propoxyphene, since Tylenol is in much greater use, seeing as it&#039;s non-controlled and available without a prescription.  I&#039;m sure the relative risk of death or illness is much, much lower.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But, you probably already knew that.  :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not really an equal comparison between Tylenol and propoxyphene, since Tylenol is in much greater use, seeing as it&#8217;s non-controlled and available without a prescription.  I&#8217;m sure the relative risk of death or illness is much, much lower.</p><p>But, you probably already knew that. <img src="http://cdn1.kevinmd.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif?e8bd46" alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/02/should-darvon-be-withdrawn-implications.html#comment-89637</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2009/02/should-darvon-be-withdrawn-the-implications-of-banning-propoxyphene.html#comment-89637</guid> <description>There is currently a discussion about this on sermo and currently it runs 80% not in favor of removing this drug from the market.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Possibly warning labels but for some patients this is the only thing that works</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is currently a discussion about this on sermo and currently it runs 80% not in favor of removing this drug from the market.</p><p>Possibly warning labels but for some patients this is the only thing that works</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mr. MedSaver</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/02/should-darvon-be-withdrawn-implications.html#comment-89635</link> <dc:creator>Mr. MedSaver</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2009/02/should-darvon-be-withdrawn-the-implications-of-banning-propoxyphene.html#comment-89635</guid> <description>I think Darvon (propoxyphene) by itself is much safer than Darvocet (propoxyphene/acetaminophen). I personally see at least ten new Darvocet prescriptions each week with the directions &quot;one to two every four to six hours.&quot; Two Darvocet every four hours . . . that&#039;s 7,800mg of acetaminophen.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Darvon (propoxyphene) by itself is much safer than Darvocet (propoxyphene/acetaminophen). I personally see at least ten new Darvocet prescriptions each week with the directions &#8220;one to two every four to six hours.&#8221; Two Darvocet every four hours . . . that&#8217;s 7,800mg of acetaminophen.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 389/393 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 19:15:57 -->
