Should Darvon be withdrawn? The implications of banning propoxyphene

February 5, 2009

The FDA advisory committee voted to ban Darvon, generically known as propoxyphene, in the United States.

MedPage Today reports on the 14-12 vote, which was prompted by numerous fatal overdoses, and non-fatal complications, as well as questioning its efficacy.

Anti-pharmaceutical crusader Sidney Wolfe made his presence felt, as he presented data claiming that in 2007, according to data gathered from emergency departments, “503 deaths were ‘related’ to propoxyphene.”

Dr. Wes contrasts these numbers to Tylenol (acetaminophen), saying it was responsible for “more than 56,000 emergency room visits and an estimated 458 deaths from acute liver failure in 2003.”

Does that mean that Tylenol should be withdrawn as well?

Will patients, some of whom chronically require Darvon for pain relief, be the real losers of the FDA advisory committee’s decision?



Related posts:

  1. How difficult is it to measure medical errors?
  2. Give ‘em 3 Tylenols
  3. The Google Health Advisory Council
  4. Vicodin and Percocet banned and taken off the market, or is a black box warning more likely?
  5. Tylenol for $1,089.50 a pop?
  6. Implications of the Arcoxia rejection
  7. What is the occupational risk of being a health care worker?


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 1 trackback }

FDA Gives Only Strong Warning on Use of Two Potent Narcotics, Stirring Debate | DOCTOR PUNDIT
July 10, 2009 at 8:57 pm

{ 4 comments }

1 Mr. MedSaver February 5, 2009 at 3:51 pm

I think Darvon (propoxyphene) by itself is much safer than Darvocet (propoxyphene/acetaminophen). I personally see at least ten new Darvocet prescriptions each week with the directions “one to two every four to six hours.” Two Darvocet every four hours . . . that’s 7,800mg of acetaminophen.

2 Anonymous February 5, 2009 at 4:55 pm

There is currently a discussion about this on sermo and currently it runs 80% not in favor of removing this drug from the market.

Possibly warning labels but for some patients this is the only thing that works

3 maribella-ella February 5, 2009 at 6:38 pm

It’s not really an equal comparison between Tylenol and propoxyphene, since Tylenol is in much greater use, seeing as it’s non-controlled and available without a prescription. I’m sure the relative risk of death or illness is much, much lower.

But, you probably already knew that. :)

4 Anonymous February 5, 2009 at 11:06 pm

short acting narcotics are not appropriate, nor are they “required” for chronic pain management.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Is there really a physician shortage?

Next post: Will integrated systems become a reality in American health care?

Site Meter