Nadya Suleman’s fertility specialist Michael Kamrava, and how he’s able to stay in practice despite a poor history of successful implantations

February 15, 2009

The furor over the California octuplet case refuses to die.

Attention has recently been focused on her doctor, one Michael Kamrava. MedPage Today cites a LA Times story, shedding more light on the physician and his Beverly Hills practice.

In addition to the Suleman case, another one of his patients his currently hospitalized with quadruplets. Apparently, in reproductive medicine, any result greater than twins is “considered a poor outcome because of the danger it poses to the mother and the babies.”

Dr. Kamrava’s clinic has had reported pregnancy and live-birth rates significantly below the national average. Terrence Lee, a reproductive endocrinologist who’s providing some of the best insight on the issue, comments on the numbers.

He notes that the clinic does not do many cycles, and that “the number of embryos transferred in this program is higher than the national average for the younger patients.” In addition, “the pregnancy rates here for patients 35 and over could not be any worse than the zero % success rate reported by this program.”

Dr. Lee wonders how the clinic could stay in business with such a poor success rate, and if advertising and slick marketing materials trumped the efficacy of the program.



Related posts:

  1. How was Nadya Suleman impregnated with octuplets? Is IVF, the mother, or her doctors to blame?
  2. The online fertility industry
  3. Medicare cuts: A 6-month stay of execution
  4. Suing patients for poor online reviews
  5. Poor health communication
  6. Emergency room specialist call
  7. Gaps in female VA care


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 4 comments }

1 Big Red February 15, 2009 at 10:41 pm

As a man who plans to clone himself 14 times and go on welfare, I hope the Suleman story won’t inspire the sort of regulation that may interfere with my dream.

http://notnadya.blogspot.com/

2 Anonymous February 15, 2009 at 11:15 pm

Swinging for the fences.

3 Rogue Medic February 17, 2009 at 11:16 pm

Michael Kamrava, specialist in Blind Squirrel medicine. Ethical practice appears to be optional.

4 mixy June 2, 2009 at 2:44 am

Dr. Michael Kamrava used to be known as a fertility specialist for celebrities, but now, since his unethical decisions to assist the fame-seeking, unstable Nadya Suleman to achieve her 14 children, his moment of fame will go down in “infamy”. Medical professionals take a hippocratic oath, which among other attributes, involves ethics, a quality which is sadly lacking in Dr. Kamrava.
Hopefully his medical community peers will discredit him as will the public.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Universal care, increasing patient safety, and tort reform, all in one fell swoop?

Next post: Should a doctor be banished from medicine after having sex with a patient?

Site Meter