<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prescribing insulin for diabetes, do endocrinologists have a financial incentive to do so?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/01/prescribing-insulin-for-diabetes-do.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/01/prescribing-insulin-for-diabetes-do.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:35:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Family Doc</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/01/prescribing-insulin-for-diabetes-do.html/comment-page-1#comment-107647</link>
		<dc:creator>Family Doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2009/01/prescribing-insulin-for-diabetes-do-endocrinologists-have-a-financial-incentive-to-do-so.html#comment-107647</guid>
		<description>The few diabetics I have sent to endocrinology (because their diabetes proved very difficult to control, they had multiple endocrine issues or they seemed to have &quot;type 1 1/2&quot; diabetes) have seen an NP who hasn&#039;t provided any insight or changed management in any meaningful way.  

As for the newer oral agents, studies show they lower A1C by 0.5 to 1 at best.  For my uncontrolled diabetics, that&#039;s simply not sufficient, so not including those agents in the guidelines seems appropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The few diabetics I have sent to endocrinology (because their diabetes proved very difficult to control, they had multiple endocrine issues or they seemed to have &#8220;type 1 1/2&#8243; diabetes) have seen an NP who hasn&#8217;t provided any insight or changed management in any meaningful way.  </p>
<p>As for the newer oral agents, studies show they lower A1C by 0.5 to 1 at best.  For my uncontrolled diabetics, that&#8217;s simply not sufficient, so not including those agents in the guidelines seems appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/01/prescribing-insulin-for-diabetes-do.html/comment-page-1#comment-99818</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2009/01/prescribing-insulin-for-diabetes-do-endocrinologists-have-a-financial-incentive-to-do-so.html#comment-99818</guid>
		<description>Anonymous one:
You have concisely, and perhaps unintentionally, summarized the inherent conflict of interest in the sickness based medicine model (that includes physicians, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies.)  If the very question of conscious or unconscious incentives is met with moral indignation, then rational debate is precluded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous one:<br />
You have concisely, and perhaps unintentionally, summarized the inherent conflict of interest in the sickness based medicine model (that includes physicians, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies.)  If the very question of conscious or unconscious incentives is met with moral indignation, then rational debate is precluded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/01/prescribing-insulin-for-diabetes-do.html/comment-page-1#comment-89073</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2009/01/prescribing-insulin-for-diabetes-do-endocrinologists-have-a-financial-incentive-to-do-so.html#comment-89073</guid>
		<description>if one follows that line of thought, all doctors have financial incentive to keep their patients sick.  in fact, it may make more sense to keep young patients sicker since they have better paying insurance and decades during which they can continue to pay.  it&#039;s only when your insurance becomes medicare that it starts to make sense to get patients healthy so they don&#039;t clog up the physicians schedule.&lt;br/&gt;hopefully that&#039;s not what is being implied by bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if one follows that line of thought, all doctors have financial incentive to keep their patients sick.  in fact, it may make more sense to keep young patients sicker since they have better paying insurance and decades during which they can continue to pay.  it&#8217;s only when your insurance becomes medicare that it starts to make sense to get patients healthy so they don&#8217;t clog up the physicians schedule.<br />hopefully that&#8217;s not what is being implied by bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
