<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do electronic medical records really reduce malpractice risk?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/01/do-electronic-medical-records-really.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/01/do-electronic-medical-records-really.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:59:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/01/do-electronic-medical-records-really.html/comment-page-1#comment-89105</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2009/01/do-electronic-medical-records-really-reduce-malpractice-risk.html#comment-89105</guid>
		<description>I freely admit I&#039;m a documenting moron. But when I was a 3rd year rotating through Family medicine, I looked like a stud when I had to turn in anonomized clinic notes for grading. The reason? The multispecialty practice I was at had an EMR that wrote up mad-lib type notes based on a cc or how long/what level the visit was.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A monkey could have charted with this thing; it even reminded me to ask about side effects if a patient had gotten a new drug added recently.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t think the EMR led me to better dx or tx (although it would offer helpful A/P text I could crib) but I am certain that if any of those charts showed up in court, there&#039;s way less chance I&#039;d get tripped up by failing to document the risk of driving while on ambien or something equally stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I freely admit I&#8217;m a documenting moron. But when I was a 3rd year rotating through Family medicine, I looked like a stud when I had to turn in anonomized clinic notes for grading. The reason? The multispecialty practice I was at had an EMR that wrote up mad-lib type notes based on a cc or how long/what level the visit was.</p>
<p>A monkey could have charted with this thing; it even reminded me to ask about side effects if a patient had gotten a new drug added recently.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the EMR led me to better dx or tx (although it would offer helpful A/P text I could crib) but I am certain that if any of those charts showed up in court, there&#8217;s way less chance I&#8217;d get tripped up by failing to document the risk of driving while on ambien or something equally stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/01/do-electronic-medical-records-really.html/comment-page-1#comment-89055</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2009/01/do-electronic-medical-records-really-reduce-malpractice-risk.html#comment-89055</guid>
		<description>As a family practitioner, I am disgusted that my own organization, the AAFP, does not do a better job of presenting the data.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Stop drinking the kool-aid.&lt;br/&gt;EMR&#039;s are nice, but they are far from a panacea for all that ails medicine.  A lot of this hype is generated by makers of EMR&#039;s that stand to make alot of money, although have little motivation to cooperate with each other, ie make their products &quot;inter-operable&quot;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;By the way, my office has had an EMR since 2004.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a family practitioner, I am disgusted that my own organization, the AAFP, does not do a better job of presenting the data.</p>
<p>Stop drinking the kool-aid.<br />EMR&#8217;s are nice, but they are far from a panacea for all that ails medicine.  A lot of this hype is generated by makers of EMR&#8217;s that stand to make alot of money, although have little motivation to cooperate with each other, ie make their products &#8220;inter-operable&#8221;.</p>
<p>By the way, my office has had an EMR since 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
