<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could privacy laws and bureaucracy derail universal electronic health records?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/01/could-privacy-laws-and-bureaucracy.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/01/could-privacy-laws-and-bureaucracy.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:43:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ICMCC Website - Articles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Could privacy laws and bureaucracy derail universal electronic health records?</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/01/could-privacy-laws-and-bureaucracy.html/comment-page-1#comment-92952</link>
		<dc:creator>ICMCC Website - Articles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Could privacy laws and bureaucracy derail universal electronic health records?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2009/01/could-privacy-laws-and-bureaucracy-derail-universal-electronic-health-records.html#comment-92952</guid>
		<description>[...] phone calls, will ensure a quick end to any initiative meant to alter physician behavior.&#8221; Article KevinMD, 22 January 2009 SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Could privacy laws and bureaucracy derail [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] phone calls, will ensure a quick end to any initiative meant to alter physician behavior.&#8221; Article KevinMD, 22 January 2009 SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &#8220;Could privacy laws and bureaucracy derail [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/01/could-privacy-laws-and-bureaucracy.html/comment-page-1#comment-89409</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2009/01/could-privacy-laws-and-bureaucracy-derail-universal-electronic-health-records.html#comment-89409</guid>
		<description>It is not privacy laws that are a barrier.  HIPPA pretty much settled that.  It is the real ethical obligations of doctors and the real viable concerns of patients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not privacy laws that are a barrier.  HIPPA pretty much settled that.  It is the real ethical obligations of doctors and the real viable concerns of patients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/01/could-privacy-laws-and-bureaucracy.html/comment-page-1#comment-89379</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2009/01/could-privacy-laws-and-bureaucracy-derail-universal-electronic-health-records.html#comment-89379</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Balancing patient privacy with ease of digital record adoption is tricky. On one hand, it is true that these records may not protect patient information as securely as one would like.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Have doctors ever heard of encryption or access control? With a properly implemented access control, the electronic records an be no less secure than paper records. Amazon.com, for example, as well as most other online merchants as well as banks protect our credit card information more effectively than stores protect their paper records.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yes, in a medical office many people may need access records. This is what user roles are for. All the technology is there. If a hospital orders a custom-made system and then refuses to pay for the proper security implementation - I heard that from a person who works on medical information systems, it&#039;s not the fault of technology, it&#039;s the fault of a hospital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Balancing patient privacy with ease of digital record adoption is tricky. On one hand, it is true that these records may not protect patient information as securely as one would like.</i><br />Have doctors ever heard of encryption or access control? With a properly implemented access control, the electronic records an be no less secure than paper records. Amazon.com, for example, as well as most other online merchants as well as banks protect our credit card information more effectively than stores protect their paper records.</p>
<p>Yes, in a medical office many people may need access records. This is what user roles are for. All the technology is there. If a hospital orders a custom-made system and then refuses to pay for the proper security implementation &#8211; I heard that from a person who works on medical information systems, it&#8217;s not the fault of technology, it&#8217;s the fault of a hospital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2010-03-20 23:46:17 -->