<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Choosing between a failed system and a system destined to failure</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/11/choosing-between-failed-system-and.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/11/choosing-between-failed-system-and.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Lee</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/11/choosing-between-failed-system-and.html#comment-87918</link> <dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/11/choosing-between-a-failed-system-and-a-system-destined-to-failure.html#comment-87918</guid> <description>Not only should the patient bear more of the cost of their treatment, but the entire system should be more transparent so consumers know who&#039;s getting what and why. The government (At all levels) and insurance companies have their fingers so deep in the healthcare pie a consumer can&#039;t hope to make an informed choice with cost as a factor.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We, as patients, have been told incessantly to take charge of our own healthcare. It&#039;s easier than ever nowadays for an individual to keep up on their own illnesses and treatments and know more than the doctor that&#039;s treating them. What we need now is the next piece of the puzzle: the ability to see what everything costs and how the money flows in the system. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And if a patient wants a test that a doctor doesn&#039;t think is necessary and is willing to shoulder the financial burden, why should the patient be able to?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only should the patient bear more of the cost of their treatment, but the entire system should be more transparent so consumers know who&#8217;s getting what and why. The government (At all levels) and insurance companies have their fingers so deep in the healthcare pie a consumer can&#8217;t hope to make an informed choice with cost as a factor.</p><p>We, as patients, have been told incessantly to take charge of our own healthcare. It&#8217;s easier than ever nowadays for an individual to keep up on their own illnesses and treatments and know more than the doctor that&#8217;s treating them. What we need now is the next piece of the puzzle: the ability to see what everything costs and how the money flows in the system.</p><p>And if a patient wants a test that a doctor doesn&#8217;t think is necessary and is willing to shoulder the financial burden, why should the patient be able to?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/11/choosing-between-failed-system-and.html#comment-87910</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/11/choosing-between-a-failed-system-and-a-system-destined-to-failure.html#comment-87910</guid> <description>Deron:  and how many time will the average physician experience verbal abuse, formal complaints, and even threats before he stops using that code forever?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;BTW, aren&#039;t MRI&#039;s therapeutic?  As long as the physicians are also selling himself to the patient as a customer, they aren&#039;t not going to go against them to any great degree.  I have seen too many people want an MRI they didn&#039;t need--they will always get it from someone even if they have to shop around, and forever deride the professional skills of the doctor who wouldn&#039;t order it.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What is needed is for people to pay for their own non-castatrophic health care without third party intermediaries.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deron:  and how many time will the average physician experience verbal abuse, formal complaints, and even threats before he stops using that code forever?</p><p>BTW, aren&#8217;t MRI&#8217;s therapeutic?  As long as the physicians are also selling himself to the patient as a customer, they aren&#8217;t not going to go against them to any great degree.  I have seen too many people want an MRI they didn&#8217;t need&#8211;they will always get it from someone even if they have to shop around, and forever deride the professional skills of the doctor who wouldn&#8217;t order it.</p><p>What is needed is for people to pay for their own non-castatrophic health care without third party intermediaries.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mottsapplesauce</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/11/choosing-between-failed-system-and.html#comment-87903</link> <dc:creator>mottsapplesauce</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/11/choosing-between-a-failed-system-and-a-system-destined-to-failure.html#comment-87903</guid> <description>We already have something similar to this in the DME industry. It&#039;s not a special ICD-9, but rather a modifier that&#039;s attached to the billing code for the item HCPC (CPT for practitioners), which indicates the DME was not ordered by a physician, or other licensed practitioner. Some items we carry can&#039;t be dispensed without a prescription, but many don&#039;t require one, unless the consumer wants their insurance billed for the service. However, in general, if we receive a prescription for DME, that&#039;s telling us the prescriber deems it to be medically necessary. If practitioners feel that some procedures are unwarranted, they shouldn&#039;t prescribe them. However if a patient wants say a CT scan that&#039;s not necessary they should pay up front, or make payment arrangements, if that&#039;s possible without a script.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We already have something similar to this in the DME industry. It&#8217;s not a special ICD-9, but rather a modifier that&#8217;s attached to the billing code for the item HCPC (CPT for practitioners), which indicates the DME was not ordered by a physician, or other licensed practitioner. Some items we carry can&#8217;t be dispensed without a prescription, but many don&#8217;t require one, unless the consumer wants their insurance billed for the service. However, in general, if we receive a prescription for DME, that&#8217;s telling us the prescriber deems it to be medically necessary. If practitioners feel that some procedures are unwarranted, they shouldn&#8217;t prescribe them. However if a patient wants say a CT scan that&#8217;s not necessary they should pay up front, or make payment arrangements, if that&#8217;s possible without a script.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Deron Schriver</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/11/choosing-between-failed-system-and.html#comment-87899</link> <dc:creator>Deron Schriver</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/11/choosing-between-a-failed-system-and-a-system-destined-to-failure.html#comment-87899</guid> <description>I like that concept.  If a physician orders a test solely because the patient demands it, a special ICD-9 code should be used to reflect the fact that the order was not based on medical necessity and the patient is responsible for payment.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that concept.  If a physician orders a test solely because the patient demands it, a special ICD-9 code should be used to reflect the fact that the order was not based on medical necessity and the patient is responsible for payment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 374/378 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 15:57:16 -->
