Jaan Sidorov runs the initial numbers, and it doesn’t look promising. The reduction of claims expense would have to be at least 8 percent, a daunting number.
Put another way, if 100 Medicare beneficiaries signed up for the medical home, 1 to 2 hospitalizations would have to be avoided. Of course, random variation can easily skew the numbers the other way and make the program more expensive than it’s worth.
The way it’s currently structured, it looks like a lot of work for an awfully small carrot.
Related posts:
- Does coordinating care save money, and if not, is it worth the effort?
- Why not a down payment for primary care, and problems with the medical home?
- Primary care: Is it worth it?
- How the patient-centered medical home can improve our health care system
- Disaster for the medical home?
- UnitedHealth leading the way on the medical home?
- Medical home
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe








{ 1 comment }
It looks like the AAFP might disagree with that analysis. http://medicaleconomics.modernmedicine.com/memag/News+You+Can+Use/News-New-AAFP-president-lists-top-health-care-refo/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/558658
Comments on this entry are closed.