Matthew Mintz is disturbed by a letter from CVS pharmacy, making overt recommendations of a brand name Merck diabetes drug:
Though today it was only a letter promoting a drug attached to a patient who might potentially need it, what’s next? Will I be receiving promotional calls from my local CVS pharmacy which seems like a professional to professional communication, but is really a disguised sales pitch? Will the retail pharmacist get a pop-up message when a patient is refilling a certain medication to ask their doctor to prescribe another? We are a free market society, and drug companies have a right to market their products, but the letter I received today is just plain wrong.
Pharmacies recommending switching to generic medications is fine, but it is to the patient’s detriment to start promoting expensive brand name medications.
Related posts:
- Poll: Do gifts from pharmaceutical companies influence how physicians prescribe?
- Are drug companies trying to influence health journalists?
- The waning effect of direct to consumer drug advertising
- "Pay to delay": How Big Pharma is paying off generic drug companies
- Do free sample medications really save patients money?
- Should consumer prescription drug ads be reined in?
- Pharmacies in physician offices
KevinMD.com on Facebook
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe








{ 2 comments }
Medical clinics owned by pharmacies and staffed by pharmacy employees–the ultimate in conflict of interest, patient information disseminated to insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies without patient consent, data mining of pharmaceutical info by drug companies, constantly shifting generic sources—all good reasons to return to the old practice of physician dispensing to maintain quality and privacy.
we already get letters from the pharmacy asking us to switch drugs, why don’t the patients call for this?
Comments on this entry are closed.