<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The NY Times targets doctors, again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/10/ny-times-targets-doctors-again.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/10/ny-times-targets-doctors-again.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:15:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Payne Hertz</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/10/ny-times-targets-doctors-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-87528</link>
		<dc:creator>Payne Hertz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 05:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/10/the-ny-times-targets-doctors-again.html#comment-87528</guid>
		<description>So are you suggesting that when a patient acquires an infection that is significantly, if not 100 percent, preventable due to such factors as doctors not washing their hands, or hospitals not establishing or following protocols to limit infections, hospitals and doctors should still be paid in full? If you buy an airline ticket with a credit card and the plane crashes due to faulty maintenance, leaving you or a family member dead or injured, should you be required to pay for the ticket and any hospital or funeral expenses associated with the crash, simply because there is no maintenance protocol that can 100 percent prevent crashes? If not, please explain why medical care is different. Have airlines stopped serving passengers or &quot;high risk&quot; areas simply because they are not allowed to do this?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Considering the high number of deaths and injuries due to preventable medical errors every year and the medical profession&#039;s cavalier indifference to the massive human suffering caused by these errors and failure to take adequate measures to control them, speaking the only language the medical profession seems to understand--$$$--is a good first step. Airline crashes are rare specifically because airlines cannot pass on the costs of their mistakes to their customers the way the medical profession can, so it has a far greater incentive to prevent error and does a damn good job of doing so. There&#039;s also the fact that pilots tend to die along with their passengers when they slip up. Not many doctors get fired for preventable medical errors which number in the millions every year. And no, I don&#039;t want to hear how making sure prescriptions are written properly and saving 11,000 American lives per year by doing so is somehow more difficult and complex than maintaining a 747. It isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are you suggesting that when a patient acquires an infection that is significantly, if not 100 percent, preventable due to such factors as doctors not washing their hands, or hospitals not establishing or following protocols to limit infections, hospitals and doctors should still be paid in full? If you buy an airline ticket with a credit card and the plane crashes due to faulty maintenance, leaving you or a family member dead or injured, should you be required to pay for the ticket and any hospital or funeral expenses associated with the crash, simply because there is no maintenance protocol that can 100 percent prevent crashes? If not, please explain why medical care is different. Have airlines stopped serving passengers or &#8220;high risk&#8221; areas simply because they are not allowed to do this?</p>
<p>Considering the high number of deaths and injuries due to preventable medical errors every year and the medical profession&#8217;s cavalier indifference to the massive human suffering caused by these errors and failure to take adequate measures to control them, speaking the only language the medical profession seems to understand&#8211;$$$&#8211;is a good first step. Airline crashes are rare specifically because airlines cannot pass on the costs of their mistakes to their customers the way the medical profession can, so it has a far greater incentive to prevent error and does a damn good job of doing so. There&#8217;s also the fact that pilots tend to die along with their passengers when they slip up. Not many doctors get fired for preventable medical errors which number in the millions every year. And no, I don&#8217;t want to hear how making sure prescriptions are written properly and saving 11,000 American lives per year by doing so is somehow more difficult and complex than maintaining a 747. It isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Happy Hospitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/10/ny-times-targets-doctors-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-87524</link>
		<dc:creator>The Happy Hospitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/10/the-ny-times-targets-doctors-again.html#comment-87524</guid>
		<description>Or perhaps the never event called a balanced budget.  Perhaps we should all stop paying taxes until they get it right.  Oh wait,  only half the population pays any federal income tax.  Perhaps that 1/2 should stop paying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or perhaps the never event called a balanced budget.  Perhaps we should all stop paying taxes until they get it right.  Oh wait,  only half the population pays any federal income tax.  Perhaps that 1/2 should stop paying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supremacy Claus</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/10/ny-times-targets-doctors-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-87519</link>
		<dc:creator>Supremacy Claus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/10/the-ny-times-targets-doctors-again.html#comment-87519</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of not paying for never events. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;All valid remedies should be mutual. So if government has a never event, all taxpayers should be able to deduct its cost from their taxes. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Snow plow does not do our street. Space shuttle explodes. Overwhelming military fails to pacify a weak nation due to government lawyer interference with our warriors. Prison releases prisoner who commits a crime. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Deduct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of not paying for never events. </p>
<p>All valid remedies should be mutual. So if government has a never event, all taxpayers should be able to deduct its cost from their taxes. </p>
<p>Snow plow does not do our street. Space shuttle explodes. Overwhelming military fails to pacify a weak nation due to government lawyer interference with our warriors. Prison releases prisoner who commits a crime. </p>
<p>Deduct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR. MARY JOHNSON</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/10/ny-times-targets-doctors-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-87517</link>
		<dc:creator>DR. MARY JOHNSON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 03:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/10/the-ny-times-targets-doctors-again.html#comment-87517</guid>
		<description>Welcome to my world, Kevin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to my world, Kevin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
