Implementing electronic records

October 5, 2008

A technologist notes some of the pitfalls obstructing widespread EMR adoption. One important point is that those behind the systems don’t know how doctors work, or what makes their lives easier.

Until they do, and can come up with systems that improve physician’s lives, resistance will continue:

A large percentage of technology professionals are about the machine. They’re about the what and the how. They’re not about the who. It’s easy to fall into the view that the system was working perfectly before people got to it. Technology is 90% people. What are they doing? What is the real need? Can we do this without adding a gadget? These are hard questions to ask, and the broken and cynical among us won’t ask them. Sometimes they’re right that no one will listen anyway.



Related posts:

  1. Why health IT and electronic medical records are so misguided
  2. Funding electronic medical records and bailing out the Big Three automakers
  3. Electronic records not worth it for doctors
  4. Most hospitals still use paper records, and why money alone won’t solve the electronic medical record problem
  5. Paying doctors by the hour will increase the adoption of electronic medical records
  6. The New York Times finally gets it on electronic medical records
  7. My take: Electronic records, limiting care, Jarvik, loan forgiveness


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Transition to concierge care

Next post: The NY Times targets doctors, again

Site Meter