<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual colonoscopy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/09/virtual-colonoscopy-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/09/virtual-colonoscopy-2.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:15:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/09/virtual-colonoscopy-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-87346</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/09/virtual-colonoscopy-3.html#comment-87346</guid>
		<description>&quot;Incidental findings (not related to the bowel) that warranted additional testing occurred in 16 percent of cases. This can necessitate further, possibly unnecessary, testing.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Is this your wording, or some other analyst&#039;s?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If the testing is warranted it is arguably necessary testing, even if it results in no positive finding.  The risk/benefit ratio will vary,  but don&#039;t fall into the trap of describing a test that is negative as unecessary.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That&#039;s a fail of language and logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Incidental findings (not related to the bowel) that warranted additional testing occurred in 16 percent of cases. This can necessitate further, possibly unnecessary, testing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this your wording, or some other analyst&#8217;s?</p>
<p>If the testing is warranted it is arguably necessary testing, even if it results in no positive finding.  The risk/benefit ratio will vary,  but don&#8217;t fall into the trap of describing a test that is negative as unecessary.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a fail of language and logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
