KevinMD.com - Medical Weblog

Patient handoffs

A major downside to capping resident work-hours is increasing the number of patient handoffs between doctors.

Further decreasing allowable work-hours to 56 hours per week will only exacerbate the problem.

A survey of MGH residents suggested that this practice led to significant patient harm, almost as serious as medication-related events:
More than half of the 161 medical or surgical residents who responded to the anonymous survey said they recalled at least one occasion in their last month-long rotation when a patient suffered from flawed handoffs. About one in nine said the harm that resulted was significant.

 Subscribe  Twitter



SpringWidgets
RSS Reader
This widget is the staple of our platform. Read all your feeds right here with this one widget - Supported feeds are OPML, RSS, RDF, ATOM. Watch your favorite Podcast in the embedded Video Player on the Desktop or publish your own video playlist to your site for others to view!
Visit the Widget Gallery



Like this article? Receive regular updates delivered free to your inbox.

Your information will never be shared or sold under any circumstances.


 


  TwitterCounter for @kevinmd


Comments

  1. Blogger ERP  

    This is the time in the ER where most errors occur. Signout. Unfortunately, working 24 hours a day until the patient is discharged or dies is not a good option.
  2. Or they can start standardizing their handoff process and making it better suited to changing shifts.

    I know they are overworked and it's difficult to add yet another improvement process in the mix, but in the long run, you guys need to understand that residents need a life too and better rested residents with better handoff processes will eventually lead to fewer mistakes than before the 80 hours/week threshold.
  3. Would not better, more specific, easily-scanned, electronic patient records help?
  4. Anonymous Anonymous  

    Anecdotes are not data. Why do doctors refuse to believe this?

    Evidence suggests hour limits better for patients.

    http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/121683.php
  5. Anonymous Anonymous  

    A single-institution study is an anecdote? Ironic that anon cites another single-institution study as counterpoint. The following 2 studies are the real deal. Nothing beats national data when you're trying to evaluate the effect of a national intervention.

    http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/298/9/975?ct

    http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/298/9/984
  6. Anonymous Anonymous  

    Excuse me, the gall bladder study was in fact a study with real data, not a survey, which is the detritus of all empirical research.
Post a Comment







nursing uniforms
Nursing Scrubs
Nursing Scrubs

by Cherokee
Including beautiful Mock Wrap Scrubs at ScrubsGallery.com.






 


Site Meter