Money for electronic records

September 28, 2008

Our favorite politician Pete Stark has introduced legislation giving bonuses for physicians who transfer over to a federally-approved electronic record system. The total payment is $40,000 over five years per physician, with penalties for late adopters.

Considering it costs up to $30,000 for each physician to implement computerized records, this surprisingly seems like an appropriate sum of money.



Related posts:

  1. Pie in the sky and electronic records
  2. The low adoption rate of electronic records
  3. Poll: Will electronic medical records really save money?
  4. Most hospitals still use paper records, and why money alone won’t solve the electronic medical record problem
  5. The New York Times finally gets it on electronic medical records
  6. Op-ed: Why doctors still balk at electronic medical records
  7. How the widespread adoption of electronic medical records can raise health care costs


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 3 comments }

1 Anonymous September 29, 2008 at 6:44 am

A sucker’s deal: if the government provides a voucher for $40K, you can be sure that the price will rise to $80K.
I can’t imagine taking Fourtney Stark at his word.

2 Anonymous September 30, 2008 at 9:20 pm

It could hardly be worse than as at present with no incentive and only disincentive.

$40K is not a lot of money for these systems, especially if you are adding in hardware and device interfaces. And why should the cost go to 80K? If anything, the heat will be up on the manufacturers to deliver as much as possible for that money. You know, that competition thing.

3 Anonymous October 1, 2008 at 11:29 pm

So why does the Govt. find such interest in everyone being on EMRs? Something to think about.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Imaging in early detection of lung cancer

Next post: EMRs and your life

Site Meter