<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consumerism and health quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/09/consumerism-and-health-quality.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/09/consumerism-and-health-quality.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:39:33 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Furst http://www.waittimes.blogspot.com</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/09/consumerism-and-health-quality.html/comment-page-1#comment-87445</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Furst http://www.waittimes.blogspot.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/09/consumerism-and-health-quality.html#comment-87445</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to call bullshit on this one Kevin.  You only wrote half the story.  It was a theoritical model for time spent with the patients and a survey of physicians&#039; on perceived quality. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Based on the abstract, there&#039;s no conclusion about patient satisfaction, access to care or actual outcomes discussed.  Even though your conclusions are progressive, the storys&#039; implication is that more information is bad - tough pill for a medical blogger to shallow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to call bullshit on this one Kevin.  You only wrote half the story.  It was a theoritical model for time spent with the patients and a survey of physicians&#8217; on perceived quality. </p>
<p>Based on the abstract, there&#8217;s no conclusion about patient satisfaction, access to care or actual outcomes discussed.  Even though your conclusions are progressive, the storys&#8217; implication is that more information is bad &#8211; tough pill for a medical blogger to shallow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2010-03-17 17:01:06 -->