<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s not happy with the new prostate cancer screening recommendations?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/08/whos-not-happy-at-new-prostate-cancer.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/08/whos-not-happy-at-new-prostate-cancer.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:59:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Independent Urologist</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/08/whos-not-happy-at-new-prostate-cancer.html/comment-page-1#comment-86967</link>
		<dc:creator>The Independent Urologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/08/whos-not-happy-with-the-new-prostate-cancer-screening-recommendations.html#comment-86967</guid>
		<description>First of all it is a recommendation, not a mandate.  The comment by the LA urologist may have been taken out of context.  A 75 year old man in good health whose father is still alive may benefit from a biopsy after a proper informed consent discussion.  A 50 year old man with Child&#039;s B cirrrhosis, on the other hand, would probably not benefit from the screening.  Medicine is more complex than a sound bite.  But thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all it is a recommendation, not a mandate.  The comment by the LA urologist may have been taken out of context.  A 75 year old man in good health whose father is still alive may benefit from a biopsy after a proper informed consent discussion.  A 50 year old man with Child&#8217;s B cirrrhosis, on the other hand, would probably not benefit from the screening.  Medicine is more complex than a sound bite.  But thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/08/whos-not-happy-at-new-prostate-cancer.html/comment-page-1#comment-86965</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/08/whos-not-happy-with-the-new-prostate-cancer-screening-recommendations.html#comment-86965</guid>
		<description>&quot;Cutting back on screening will affect the revenue of urologists.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The proper phrasing, of course, is: &quot;Cutting back on screening will affect the revenue stream of urologists.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Cutting back on screening will affect the revenue of urologists.&#8221;</p>
<p>The proper phrasing, of course, is: &#8220;Cutting back on screening will affect the revenue stream of urologists.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
