Medicare is wading into dangerous territory here. Instead of further scrutinizing the current conditions on the no-pay list, they’re aggressively expanding it.
Policy makers should be aware of the unintended consequences of certain pay for performance measures.
A poorly thought-out no-pay list will lead to similar circumstances, paradoxically increasing costs and patient harm:
For example, even with the best treatment, blood clots remain relatively common in patients after knee and hip replacements, according to the Society of Hospital Medicine, a national group of hospital-based docs. What’s more, the new rules could add incentives for hospitals to over-use blood thinners in an effort to drive rates down.
Related posts:
- Does being on the America’s Best Hospitals list affect patient outcomes?
- How the economy may make health care costs soar
- Medicare: No incentives to control costs
- What sets off metal detectors?
- Knee surgeries
- Do we really need fancier, more expensive hospital gowns?
- Can aspirin with Plavix be a new option to prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation?
KevinMD.com on Facebook
{ 1 comment }
Oh, that’s easy. They’ll simply add anticoagulation-related bleed to the list of “no-pay” conditions.
Comments on this entry are closed.