Something is better than nothing

August 11, 2008

It is not often that this corner agrees with the shrill Paul Krugman of the NY Times.

In his column today, one sentence rang true:

Some health care reformers wanted the Democrats to endorse a single-payer, Medicare-type system for all . . .

. . . But it’s better to have an imperfect universal health care plan than none at all.

If someone as far-left as Krugman admits that, physicians at PNHP should take heed, and stop wasting their resources promoting an ideal that cannot be feasibly implemented politically.



Related posts:

  1. Universal health care oxymoron
  2. My take: Dr. Nurses, supporting universal care
  3. Will universal health care lead to a physician shortage?
  4. The candidates aren’t addressing the physician shortage
  5. Is Physicians for a National Health Program the biggest threat to Obama’s health reform plan?
  6. We need comparative effectiveness research, or, I agree with Paul Krugman for the first time ever
  7. Health care fight on the left


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 2 comments }

1 Chuck Brooks August 11, 2008 at 8:03 am

Whatever Krugman and his ilk want will most certainly be imperfect. Be careful what you wish for.

2 Anonymous August 12, 2008 at 6:44 pm

There is no problem so great that the government can’t make it worse. That isn’t dogma. It is an observation from direct personal experience.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Diagnosing the primary cause of joint pain

Next post: Rage in the OR

Site Meter