<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LA Times on medical blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/08/la-times-on-medical-blogs.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/08/la-times-on-medical-blogs.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:35:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Theresa</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/08/la-times-on-medical-blogs.html/comment-page-1#comment-86918</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/08/la-times-on-medical-blogs.html#comment-86918</guid>
		<description>Excellent synopsis of the problem, Kevin. As you know, I have also been weighing my commitment to transparency against the risk of exposure. I do not claim to have solved the problem. The presence of this dialogue, on your blog and others, is an important first step.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent synopsis of the problem, Kevin. As you know, I have also been weighing my commitment to transparency against the risk of exposure. I do not claim to have solved the problem. The presence of this dialogue, on your blog and others, is an important first step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fidel, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/08/la-times-on-medical-blogs.html/comment-page-1#comment-86915</link>
		<dc:creator>Fidel, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 02:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/08/la-times-on-medical-blogs.html#comment-86915</guid>
		<description>Considering the overt political campaigning and PC BS that passes for &#039;peer reviewed&#039; medical literature in the best journals of the day (Lancet, NEJB, JAMA) bloggers aren&#039;t much worse off - and much faster to publication.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The difference?  People expect that bloggers will deliver crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the overt political campaigning and PC BS that passes for &#8216;peer reviewed&#8217; medical literature in the best journals of the day (Lancet, NEJB, JAMA) bloggers aren&#8217;t much worse off &#8211; and much faster to publication.</p>
<p>The difference?  People expect that bloggers will deliver crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurice Bernstein, M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/08/la-times-on-medical-blogs.html/comment-page-1#comment-86914</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurice Bernstein, M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/08/la-times-on-medical-blogs.html#comment-86914</guid>
		<description>I think that the public deserves to know that true identity of the physician blogger and also whether there is any conflict of interest with regard to the facts or views being broadcast. Why should a physician not meet professional ethical standards just because the communication with any patient is on the internet than in the office? Taking time and attention to think out a non-identifying scenario, based on a real case, to provide an example case for discussion is possible with true anonymity to the real patient. In addition, I agree, medical bloggers should also follow establish ethical standard set out for other professionals in the news media.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have no conflict of interest in writing what I just wrote except for my interest in ethics and medical professionalism. ..Maurice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the public deserves to know that true identity of the physician blogger and also whether there is any conflict of interest with regard to the facts or views being broadcast. Why should a physician not meet professional ethical standards just because the communication with any patient is on the internet than in the office? Taking time and attention to think out a non-identifying scenario, based on a real case, to provide an example case for discussion is possible with true anonymity to the real patient. In addition, I agree, medical bloggers should also follow establish ethical standard set out for other professionals in the news media.</p>
<p>I have no conflict of interest in writing what I just wrote except for my interest in ethics and medical professionalism. ..Maurice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Hastings</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/08/la-times-on-medical-blogs.html/comment-page-1#comment-86913</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Hastings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/08/la-times-on-medical-blogs.html#comment-86913</guid>
		<description>I recently ran into this topic head on in a very personal way. Although I am not quite ready to jump into the fray regarding details of my what I hope will be only a &quot;near-blogastrophe&quot;, I think this is one of the most important issues facing medical bloggers today. We are building the foundations for this media for years to come with every post we write. All journalists have standards that their field has developed over time through trial and error and this media form is no different. We are right now setting the standards. What will they be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently ran into this topic head on in a very personal way. Although I am not quite ready to jump into the fray regarding details of my what I hope will be only a &#8220;near-blogastrophe&#8221;, I think this is one of the most important issues facing medical bloggers today. We are building the foundations for this media for years to come with every post we write. All journalists have standards that their field has developed over time through trial and error and this media form is no different. We are right now setting the standards. What will they be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
