<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google thyself</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/07/google-thyself.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/07/google-thyself.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Pimp your Google</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/07/google-thyself.html#comment-86605</link> <dc:creator>Pimp your Google</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/07/google-thyself.html#comment-86605</guid> <description>Not to undermine the larger point made that &quot;search engine  reputation&quot; management is prudent and useful to a physician practicing today,  two points:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;First,  googling or searching public information is not stalking by any definition.   Most of the internet is not a private space, the information available for searching is public.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Stalking would be using that information to contact and terrorize the victim or   proxies for the victim.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Second point: the &quot;experts&quot; appear to be distorting or exaggerating for effect by using the word &quot;slander&quot; incorrectly or very loosely, i.e., in a non-legal sense.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;See also that lawsuit Gary Condit filed against Dominic Dunne,  thrown out of court recently.&lt;br/&gt;Opinions formed  by patients are not &quot;slander&quot; even in the loose sense if they are an opinion about subjective matters.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to undermine the larger point made that &#8220;search engine  reputation&#8221; management is prudent and useful to a physician practicing today,  two points:</p><p>First,  googling or searching public information is not stalking by any definition.   Most of the internet is not a private space, the information available for searching is public.</p><p>Stalking would be using that information to contact and terrorize the victim or   proxies for the victim.</p><p>Second point: the &#8220;experts&#8221; appear to be distorting or exaggerating for effect by using the word &#8220;slander&#8221; incorrectly or very loosely, i.e., in a non-legal sense.</p><p>See also that lawsuit Gary Condit filed against Dominic Dunne,  thrown out of court recently.<br />Opinions formed  by patients are not &#8220;slander&#8221; even in the loose sense if they are an opinion about subjective matters.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 341/345 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 09:27:12 -->
