<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google thyself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/07/google-thyself.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/07/google-thyself.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:19:02 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pimp your Google</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/07/google-thyself.html/comment-page-1#comment-86605</link>
		<dc:creator>Pimp your Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/07/google-thyself.html#comment-86605</guid>
		<description>Not to undermine the larger point made that &quot;search engine  reputation&quot; management is prudent and useful to a physician practicing today,  two points:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;First,  googling or searching public information is not stalking by any definition.   Most of the internet is not a private space, the information available for searching is public.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Stalking would be using that information to contact and terrorize the victim or   proxies for the victim.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Second point: the &quot;experts&quot; appear to be distorting or exaggerating for effect by using the word &quot;slander&quot; incorrectly or very loosely, i.e., in a non-legal sense.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;See also that lawsuit Gary Condit filed against Dominic Dunne,  thrown out of court recently.&lt;br/&gt;Opinions formed  by patients are not &quot;slander&quot; even in the loose sense if they are an opinion about subjective matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to undermine the larger point made that &#8220;search engine  reputation&#8221; management is prudent and useful to a physician practicing today,  two points:</p>
<p>First,  googling or searching public information is not stalking by any definition.   Most of the internet is not a private space, the information available for searching is public.</p>
<p>Stalking would be using that information to contact and terrorize the victim or   proxies for the victim.</p>
<p>Second point: the &#8220;experts&#8221; appear to be distorting or exaggerating for effect by using the word &#8220;slander&#8221; incorrectly or very loosely, i.e., in a non-legal sense.</p>
<p>See also that lawsuit Gary Condit filed against Dominic Dunne,  thrown out of court recently.<br />Opinions formed  by patients are not &#8220;slander&#8221; even in the loose sense if they are an opinion about subjective matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2010-03-21 15:42:57 -->