A financial motive for long ED waits?

July 24, 2008

Two emergency physicians stir things up: “Potentially, those that profit more from boarding, particularly in poorer communities with high numbers of uninsured and Medicaid patients. Imagine you run a hospital. There are two competing sources for inpatient beds. The first source is patients who come in through direct and transfer admissions. They are more likely to come with private insurance and need procedural care, both of which maximize profits. The second source is E.R. patients, who are more likely to be uninsured or have pittance-paying Medicaid and less likely to need high-margin procedures. Do the math: If you fill your hospital with the direct and transfer admissions and maroon the E.R. patients for long periods, you make more money.”

Emergiblog responds.



Related posts:

  1. Safety-net hospital financial woes
  2. Charity hospitals cherry-picking patients?
  3. ER waits: The NY Times is half-right
  4. Hospitals are closing
  5. 24/7, a thing of the past
  6. "Maternity care is a money loser for most hospitals, and there is no break-even point"
  7. Chronic Disease: The Financial Crux Of The Healthcare Crisis


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Convict has a $1.4 million hospital bill

Next post: It starts with physician payment reform

Site Meter