<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Do longer office visits matter?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/07/do-longer-office-visits-matter.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/07/do-longer-office-visits-matter.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: ptheoc</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/07/do-longer-office-visits-matter.html#comment-108859</link> <dc:creator>ptheoc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:27:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/07/do-longer-office-visits-matter.html#comment-108859</guid> <description>I feel for the Doctors. I have 9 MDs in my cell phone, I have lots of problems. I understand time constraints, really. Keep in mind, I get to see you ever 3 months, maybe. My question, when was it decided and by whom that I only get to bring up ONE symptom, ailment, side-effect, Etc per visit? Again, I ask? Some of my 9 physicians (3) sent me a batch of papers to fill out prior to my first visit. I was advised the reasoning. I was also advised that if it was not returned at least X days before the appointment, it would be canceled or rescheduled. This was very reasonable to me. I appreciated a chance to express all my concerns. It also helped me prioritize my concerns. The doctors that do this &quot;paper triage&quot; give much better care. Their staffs are well oiled machines. I have seen more organization in other, less critical businesses. A doctor’s lack of planning is not my fault. And yes, I do value what they do and their training. That’s why I am in your offices.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel for the Doctors. I have 9 MDs in my cell phone, I have lots of problems. I understand time constraints, really. Keep in mind, I get to see you ever 3 months, maybe.</p><p>My question, when was it decided and by whom that I only get to bring up ONE symptom, ailment, side-effect, Etc per visit? Again, I ask?</p><p>Some of my 9 physicians (3) sent me a batch of papers to fill out prior to my first visit. I was advised the reasoning. I was also advised that if it was not returned at least X days before the appointment, it would be canceled or rescheduled. This was very reasonable to me. I appreciated a chance to express all my concerns. It also helped me prioritize my concerns.</p><p>The doctors that do this &#8220;paper triage&#8221; give much better care. Their staffs are well oiled machines.</p><p>I have seen more organization in other, less critical businesses. A doctor’s lack of planning is not my fault.</p><p>And yes, I do value what they do and their training. That’s why I am in your offices.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doctor ZXC</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/07/do-longer-office-visits-matter.html#comment-86844</link> <dc:creator>Doctor ZXC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/07/do-longer-office-visits-matter.html#comment-86844</guid> <description>&quot;blood pressure was checked and smoking discussed more often&quot;&lt;br/&gt;These are useful interventions that are part of the physicians agenda for an office visit. Patient satisfaction can only increase by also attending to the patient&#039;s agenda and concerns about his symptoms. The link is &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab003540.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Effects of interventions aimed at changing the length of primary care physicians&#039; consultation&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;blood pressure was checked and smoking discussed more often&#8221;<br />These are useful interventions that are part of the physicians agenda for an office visit. Patient satisfaction can only increase by also attending to the patient&#8217;s agenda and concerns about his symptoms. The link is <a HREF="http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab003540.html" REL="nofollow">Effects of interventions aimed at changing the length of primary care physicians&#8217; consultation</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Moshe</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/07/do-longer-office-visits-matter.html#comment-86837</link> <dc:creator>Moshe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/07/do-longer-office-visits-matter.html#comment-86837</guid> <description>I have not seen the study (tried finding it but was unsuccessful), but I&#039;ll comment in any case:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;1) We are missing the facts.  Were the office visits increased from 3 minutes to 4.5 minutes, or from 7 minutes to 30 minutes?  This could be a very big factor - the fact that an additional 2 minutes were added might not change anything, but a 10 minute increase might make a big difference.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2) Sometimes, Doctors who are used to 5 minute visits don&#039;t have much more to do in additional time - they have forgotten how to build a relationship with the patient, and as such, have nothing to do with the additional time.  Maybe a study should be done regarding the satisfaction of patients who routinely see doctors who invest them with 5 minutes vs. patients whose doctors routinely give them 20-30 minutes for office visits.  My gut feeling is that group #2 will have far higher satisfaction, and that will lead to better management of illnesses and a healthier lifestyle in general.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not seen the study (tried finding it but was unsuccessful), but I&#8217;ll comment in any case:</p><p>1) We are missing the facts.  Were the office visits increased from 3 minutes to 4.5 minutes, or from 7 minutes to 30 minutes?  This could be a very big factor &#8211; the fact that an additional 2 minutes were added might not change anything, but a 10 minute increase might make a big difference.</p><p>2) Sometimes, Doctors who are used to 5 minute visits don&#8217;t have much more to do in additional time &#8211; they have forgotten how to build a relationship with the patient, and as such, have nothing to do with the additional time.  Maybe a study should be done regarding the satisfaction of patients who routinely see doctors who invest them with 5 minutes vs. patients whose doctors routinely give them 20-30 minutes for office visits.  My gut feeling is that group #2 will have far higher satisfaction, and that will lead to better management of illnesses and a healthier lifestyle in general.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 363/367 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 13:46:28 -->
