Summarizing the Russert case

June 24, 2008

Medicine is still an inexact science: “A doctor’s care is not a protective bubble, and cardiology is not the exact science that many people wish it to be. A person’s risk of a heart attack can only be estimated, and although drugs, diet and exercise may lower that risk, they cannot eliminate it entirely. True, the death rate from heart disease has declined, but it is still the leading cause of death in the United States, killing 650,000 people a year. About 300,000 die suddenly, and about half, like Mr. Russert, have no symptoms.”



Related posts:

  1. Government-run health care
  2. My take: Tim Russert
  3. More Russert analysis
  4. Russert syndrome
  5. America’s failed attempt at a single-payer system, the Indian Health Service
  6. Heart disease and women
  7. How did Michael Jackson die, and the medicine behind sudden cardiac death


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 1 comment }

1 Anonymous June 24, 2008 at 8:31 am

was tim russert taking avandia for his diabetic condition? why is there no talk about that? it seems a bit odd that very little is being devoted to this aspect.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Op-ed: What we have in health care today is a failure to communicate

Next post: Spending patterns

Site Meter