<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Mammography is a &quot;crude tool&quot;</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/06/mammography-is-crude-tool.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/06/mammography-is-crude-tool.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Kitty</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/06/mammography-is-crude-tool.html#comment-86474</link> <dc:creator>Kitty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/06/mammography-is-a-crude-tool.html#comment-86474</guid> <description>Why? Do you think that risks of mammography like overdiagnosis shall be a secret? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Don&#039;t you think women have a right to know about risks as well as benefits of any test especially tests that have such a small probability of benefitting them personally and that has a small risk of harming them by possibly subjecting them to potentially harmful treatment unnecessarily i.e. in case of overdiagnosis? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;women that should be using this &quot;tool&quot; until better scanning options become available&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Isn&#039;t what women &quot;should&quot; or &quot;shouldn&#039;t&quot; do are ultimately their personal choice?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why? Do you think that risks of mammography like overdiagnosis shall be a secret?</p><p>Don&#8217;t you think women have a right to know about risks as well as benefits of any test especially tests that have such a small probability of benefitting them personally and that has a small risk of harming them by possibly subjecting them to potentially harmful treatment unnecessarily i.e. in case of overdiagnosis?</p><p><i>women that should be using this &#8220;tool&#8221; until better scanning options become available</i><br />Isn&#8217;t what women &#8220;should&#8221; or &#8220;shouldn&#8217;t&#8221; do are ultimately their personal choice?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bill</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/06/mammography-is-crude-tool.html#comment-86468</link> <dc:creator>bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/06/mammography-is-a-crude-tool.html#comment-86468</guid> <description>I think the use of the phrase &quot;crude tool&quot; does a disservice and could potentially scare off women that should be using this &quot;tool&quot; until better scanning options become available.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the use of the phrase &#8220;crude tool&#8221; does a disservice and could potentially scare off women that should be using this &#8220;tool&#8221; until better scanning options become available.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 352/356 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 13:49:15 -->
