<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Infant tossing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/05/infant-tossing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/05/infant-tossing.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:59:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/05/infant-tossing.html/comment-page-1#comment-85580</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/05/infant-tossing.html#comment-85580</guid>
		<description>British General Sir Charles James Napier (August 10, 1782 – August 29, 1853) was a British general and Commander-in-Chief in India. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The locals complained about British  abolition of the practice of Sati (suttee). It was an Indian practice whereby a widow burns herself to death (voluntarily or otherwise) either on the funeral pyre of her husband or soon after his death. The custom may be rooted in ancient beliefs that a husband needed his companions in the afterlife, though opponents point to it as an indication of a value system deeply hostile to women. Developed by the 4th century BC, it became widespread in the 17th – 18th centuries but was banned in British India in 1829. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The Indians complained to Napier that the British were interfering with their cultural traditions. His response:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>British General Sir Charles James Napier (August 10, 1782 – August 29, 1853) was a British general and Commander-in-Chief in India. </p>
<p>The locals complained about British  abolition of the practice of Sati (suttee). It was an Indian practice whereby a widow burns herself to death (voluntarily or otherwise) either on the funeral pyre of her husband or soon after his death. The custom may be rooted in ancient beliefs that a husband needed his companions in the afterlife, though opponents point to it as an indication of a value system deeply hostile to women. Developed by the 4th century BC, it became widespread in the 17th – 18th centuries but was banned in British India in 1829. </p>
<p>The Indians complained to Napier that the British were interfering with their cultural traditions. His response:</p>
<p>&#8220;You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/05/infant-tossing.html/comment-page-1#comment-85483</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/05/infant-tossing.html#comment-85483</guid>
		<description>&quot;cultural sensitivity&quot;  Would that be the fancy way of saying &quot;none of our business&quot;.  I think the relative parts of the story are that the tossing is in India, and quoted docs in the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;cultural sensitivity&#8221;  Would that be the fancy way of saying &#8220;none of our business&#8221;.  I think the relative parts of the story are that the tossing is in India, and quoted docs in the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
