Pediatricians are debating health risks versus cultural sensitivity.
Related posts:
- How much of the teen patient visit should you keep confidential?
- Infant mental health
- Inflating the US infant mortality rate
- A seizing infant
- Asymmetric, dilated pupil in an infant
- A man, charged with killing his infant, sues the physician
- Infant mortality: Can it be used to compare health systems?
KevinMD.com on Facebook
{ 2 comments }
“cultural sensitivity” Would that be the fancy way of saying “none of our business”. I think the relative parts of the story are that the tossing is in India, and quoted docs in the United States.
British General Sir Charles James Napier (August 10, 1782 – August 29, 1853) was a British general and Commander-in-Chief in India.
The locals complained about British abolition of the practice of Sati (suttee). It was an Indian practice whereby a widow burns herself to death (voluntarily or otherwise) either on the funeral pyre of her husband or soon after his death. The custom may be rooted in ancient beliefs that a husband needed his companions in the afterlife, though opponents point to it as an indication of a value system deeply hostile to women. Developed by the 4th century BC, it became widespread in the 17th – 18th centuries but was banned in British India in 1829.
The Indians complained to Napier that the British were interfering with their cultural traditions. His response:
“You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours.”
Comments on this entry are closed.