<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Work-hour restrictions and poorly-trained surgeons</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/04/work-hour-restrictions-and-poorly.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/04/work-hour-restrictions-and-poorly.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: undisonus</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/04/work-hour-restrictions-and-poorly.html#comment-84772</link> <dc:creator>undisonus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/04/work-hour-restrictions-and-poorly-trained-surgeons.html#comment-84772</guid> <description>Heh, well, medicine and surgery have come a long way from the days when docs only had four antibiotics to choose from and the standard treatment for an MI was an aspirin and crossed-fingers. (I stole that from an attending who scoffs at his colleagues&#039; gripes regarding resident work-week restrictions.) There&#039;s simply too much for any one person to know, and what was general then ain&#039;t so general now. In any case, the hours-in-a-row thing is a red herring. At my not-to-be-named institution, the real consequence of the ACGME mandates on the surgery programs is reducing a surgery resident&#039;s work week from 160 hours to 120 hours, and I really don&#039;t know how they manage to hide those extra 40 hours from the auditors. The real solution, which I&#039;m sure will be highly unpopular, is to simply lengthen residency training. We&#039;re already doing it under the table by essentially requiring people to pursue fellowships, so why not make it official? The alternative, though, is simply to make amphetamines readily available &lt;b&gt;and&lt;/b&gt; mandatory for residents, and then maybe it would be reasonable to go back to the bad old days.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, well, medicine and surgery have come a long way from the days when docs only had four antibiotics to choose from and the standard treatment for an MI was an aspirin and crossed-fingers. (I stole that from an attending who scoffs at his colleagues&#8217; gripes regarding resident work-week restrictions.) There&#8217;s simply too much for any one person to know, and what was general then ain&#8217;t so general now. In any case, the hours-in-a-row thing is a red herring. At my not-to-be-named institution, the real consequence of the ACGME mandates on the surgery programs is reducing a surgery resident&#8217;s work week from 160 hours to 120 hours, and I really don&#8217;t know how they manage to hide those extra 40 hours from the auditors. The real solution, which I&#8217;m sure will be highly unpopular, is to simply lengthen residency training. We&#8217;re already doing it under the table by essentially requiring people to pursue fellowships, so why not make it official? The alternative, though, is simply to make amphetamines readily available <b>and</b> mandatory for residents, and then maybe it would be reasonable to go back to the bad old days.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 341/345 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 17:41:14 -->
