<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Send this STAT to Pete Stark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:50:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html/comment-page-1#comment-84868</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html#comment-84868</guid>
		<description>What makes you think Stark is bluffing?  Was Truman bluffing when he threatened to draft the Coal Miners?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t think he is bluffing at all and would take advantage of any opportunity to reduce physicians to a state of involuntary servitude as is the case in many nations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes you think Stark is bluffing?  Was Truman bluffing when he threatened to draft the Coal Miners?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think he is bluffing at all and would take advantage of any opportunity to reduce physicians to a state of involuntary servitude as is the case in many nations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html/comment-page-1#comment-84860</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html#comment-84860</guid>
		<description>Pete Stark has challenged fellow Members to fights on more than one occasion. Too bad the Members so challenged didn&#039;t take him up on his offer. It would somehow be gratifying if JC Watts had rearranged Stark&#039;s face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Stark has challenged fellow Members to fights on more than one occasion. Too bad the Members so challenged didn&#8217;t take him up on his offer. It would somehow be gratifying if JC Watts had rearranged Stark&#8217;s face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html/comment-page-1#comment-84859</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html#comment-84859</guid>
		<description>I believe the deal in Massachusetts is, you can&#039;t charge a Medicare recipient more than the Medicare limiting fee (as in the nonparticipating docs) as a condition of licensure.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As far as I know, that applies even if you are not in Medicare, as in, opted-out. We had to sign that attestation on our license application and renewal forms.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But it&#039;s been a long time since I practiced in the People&#039;s Republic of Massachusetts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the deal in Massachusetts is, you can&#8217;t charge a Medicare recipient more than the Medicare limiting fee (as in the nonparticipating docs) as a condition of licensure.</p>
<p>As far as I know, that applies even if you are not in Medicare, as in, opted-out. We had to sign that attestation on our license application and renewal forms.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s been a long time since I practiced in the People&#8217;s Republic of Massachusetts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html/comment-page-1#comment-84823</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html#comment-84823</guid>
		<description>&quot;I cringe when I hear people say that doctors care more about money than patients. Nothing could be further from the truth. But I&#039;m not a priest. I still have a family to support and I did not take a vow of poverty.&quot; This is a great comment from the article. The others that claim doctors should be forced to accept medicaire just show how ignorant the general public is about the financial challenges that US physicians currently face. I fear that one day doctors will be mandated to accept even more losses to take care of patients causing the crisis to worsen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I cringe when I hear people say that doctors care more about money than patients. Nothing could be further from the truth. But I&#8217;m not a priest. I still have a family to support and I did not take a vow of poverty.&#8221; This is a great comment from the article. The others that claim doctors should be forced to accept medicaire just show how ignorant the general public is about the financial challenges that US physicians currently face. I fear that one day doctors will be mandated to accept even more losses to take care of patients causing the crisis to worsen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html/comment-page-1#comment-84820</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html#comment-84820</guid>
		<description>Hasn&#039;t this already started in Massachusetts?  Don&#039;t they have a law capping the fee you can charge a Medicare eligible patient?  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Is that true?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We need to work on our public relations, explain to patients and local businesses why we can&#039;t continue to accept low payment payers and stay in business.  If we let the Stark and his allies paint us as simply greedy docs, they can screw us far worse than they are now by mandating  Medicare participation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hasn&#8217;t this already started in Massachusetts?  Don&#8217;t they have a law capping the fee you can charge a Medicare eligible patient?  </p>
<p>Is that true?</p>
<p>We need to work on our public relations, explain to patients and local businesses why we can&#8217;t continue to accept low payment payers and stay in business.  If we let the Stark and his allies paint us as simply greedy docs, they can screw us far worse than they are now by mandating  Medicare participation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html/comment-page-1#comment-84819</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html#comment-84819</guid>
		<description>Yes, and the proposed Medicare cuts are going to help that process nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, and the proposed Medicare cuts are going to help that process nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html/comment-page-1#comment-84817</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 04:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html#comment-84817</guid>
		<description>One of the commenters on the Washington Post article made an interesting conclusion:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;Simple solution to problem-don&#039;t allow doctors to decide how many Medicare patients they will take on. In other words accept all Medicare patients or you don&#039;t accept any. Many doctors like to use Medicare patients to fill in their billing schedule for the day. From my personal experience Medicare pays a fair price for services rendered.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Here is another comment:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;A first step in restoring professional ethics would be to revoke the federal DEA prescribing privileges of physicians who fail to certify annually that they accept patients with publicly supported medical coverages or fail to participate in audits of their patient populations.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think that this is what Pete Stark is aiming for: force physicians to reject Medicare patients, increase voter resentment towards physicians who refuse Medicare patients while insinuating that greed is the motivation, and eventually legislate indentured servitude onto all physicians in the United States so that it is impossible to practice medicine in the U.S. without accepting whatever the government forces upon physicians.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If it is Medicare-specific, more likely than not doctors would be glad to reject &lt;b&gt;all&lt;/b&gt; Medicare patients for the sake of simplicity and the decrease in overhead related to Medicare payments.  Unfortunately the public does not yet understand this, and the antagonism which Pete Stark is stirring up against physicians over this is not helping the situation.  Neither is the insolvency which Medicare will encounter in 11 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the commenters on the Washington Post article made an interesting conclusion:</p>
<p><i>Simple solution to problem-don&#8217;t allow doctors to decide how many Medicare patients they will take on. In other words accept all Medicare patients or you don&#8217;t accept any. Many doctors like to use Medicare patients to fill in their billing schedule for the day. From my personal experience Medicare pays a fair price for services rendered.</i></p>
<p>Here is another comment:</p>
<p><i>A first step in restoring professional ethics would be to revoke the federal DEA prescribing privileges of physicians who fail to certify annually that they accept patients with publicly supported medical coverages or fail to participate in audits of their patient populations.</i></p>
<p>I think that this is what Pete Stark is aiming for: force physicians to reject Medicare patients, increase voter resentment towards physicians who refuse Medicare patients while insinuating that greed is the motivation, and eventually legislate indentured servitude onto all physicians in the United States so that it is impossible to practice medicine in the U.S. without accepting whatever the government forces upon physicians.  </p>
<p>If it is Medicare-specific, more likely than not doctors would be glad to reject <b>all</b> Medicare patients for the sake of simplicity and the decrease in overhead related to Medicare payments.  Unfortunately the public does not yet understand this, and the antagonism which Pete Stark is stirring up against physicians over this is not helping the situation.  Neither is the insolvency which Medicare will encounter in 11 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html/comment-page-1#comment-84816</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 04:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/04/send-this-stat-to-pete-stark.html#comment-84816</guid>
		<description>Just to remind folks what the ferociusly anti-physican US Representative Pete Stark, D-Calif stated: &quot;My colleagues, my staff say, &#039;Oh, dear, the doctors would all drop Medicare.&#039; I don&#039;t believe it. I don&#039;t believe that doctors are willing to give up half their income.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Well, Pete, now what?  Oh, and Pete, you should know that this is only the beginning. Access will drop lie a stone if your 10.4% payment reduction occurs.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Nice move, Pete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to remind folks what the ferociusly anti-physican US Representative Pete Stark, D-Calif stated: &#8220;My colleagues, my staff say, &#8216;Oh, dear, the doctors would all drop Medicare.&#8217; I don&#8217;t believe it. I don&#8217;t believe that doctors are willing to give up half their income.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, Pete, now what?  Oh, and Pete, you should know that this is only the beginning. Access will drop lie a stone if your 10.4% payment reduction occurs.</p>
<p>Nice move, Pete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
