The elective C-section

April 14, 2008

Julia Llewellyn Smith: “But as long as our maternity services remain so underfunded, and our midwife shortage at a critical level, more and more women will be demanding electives, especially if they know they are the safest option.

I didn’t care about jibes. I wanted my second birth to be conducted by well-rested professionals, to have the energy to defend myself on the ward, to have some control during a process which – thanks to the NHS’s shortcomings – has become the most distressing experience of too many women’s lives.

Too posh? Too right I was.”

This midwife disagrees:

How about the negative? They are 3 times as expensive as vaginal births. They are staff intensive, normal birth = 2 midwives at any one time, perhaps an anaesthetist (epidural); assisted birth = 1 midwife, 1 obstetrician, 1 paediatrician, probably an anaesthetist; caesarian section = 1 runner, 1 scrub nurse/midwife, 1 midwife, 1 ODA, 1 anaesthetist, 2 surgeons and perhaps a paediatrician. Following the operation the woman requires close observation on a recovery ward and then a high level of nursing care on the postnatal ward.



Related posts:

  1. Midwife to the Amish
  2. Doctors and midwives need to cooperate more
  3. A mother wins a payout for hurt feelings
  4. RIP VBAC?
  5. Malpractice fears are killing off the natural childbirth movement
  6. Air Force lawsuit: Rank outweighed medical experience
  7. Assisted suicide and how insurers should embrace it


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Massachusetts

Next post: The new tiered pricing for drugs

Site Meter