David Catron takes a closer look at the well-publicized study, and finds the lead author is coming from a somewhat biased view.
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe
David Catron takes a closer look at the well-publicized study, and finds the lead author is coming from a somewhat biased view.
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe
Previous post: Hospital wars
Next post: ADHD
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Not at all surprising. After a while, you want to ignore the “studies” because you know they ginned up a “study” to support the conclusion they’ve already made. It’s just a matter of where they hid the bias this time.
Unfortunately, if the garbage research is not called out for what it is, it becomes received wisdom. Kinda like the “medical error” meme killing (insert number) Americans every year.