David Catron takes a closer look at the well-publicized study, and finds the lead author is coming from a somewhat biased view.
Related posts:
- Physicians for a National Health Program doctors arrested, and why is PNHP resorting to criminal activity to push their agenda?
- The ED overcrowding conspiracy
- Virtual colonoscopy
- McCain’s health care plan
- Government-run health care = moral superiority?
- Health care reform on a state level
- Is Physicians for a National Health Program the biggest threat to Obama’s health reform plan?
KevinMD.com on Facebook
{ 1 comment }
Not at all surprising. After a while, you want to ignore the “studies” because you know they ginned up a “study” to support the conclusion they’ve already made. It’s just a matter of where they hid the bias this time.
Unfortunately, if the garbage research is not called out for what it is, it becomes received wisdom. Kinda like the “medical error” meme killing (insert number) Americans every year.
Comments on this entry are closed.