Sharon Begley: “Yes, many people of goodwill support extending coverage to the 47 million Americans who, according to the Census Bureau, had no insurance for all or part of 2006. An awful lot of the insured, though, worry that messing with the system to bring about universal coverage, even if it allows more newborns to survive, might also hurt the quality and availability of care that they themselves get (’If I have trouble getting my doctor to see me now, what will happen when 47 million more people want appointments?’).”
Related posts:
- How Obama’s health reform will hurt Canada
- Talking health care reform in Congressional Quarterly and WORLD Magazine
- Support for the patient centered medical home in the House health reform bill
- How health care reform can improve public health
- Universal health care: Slim chance?
- The Obama health care summit, and did the President offer any clues to the upcoming health reform effort?
- Free health care in Hawaii
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe







{ 1 comment }
And her article, based on research from faulty sources (OECD using WHO figures that are not normalized to each other, reporting wildly differing outcomes based on wildly differing definitions) is worth reading why?
Comments on this entry are closed.